On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Leigh Porter
leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com wrote:
What's the nicest way of allowing the ops servers all talk to each VPN
instance? At the moment I just us pretty normal L3VPN techniques so that
every VPN sees routes tagged with the ops VPN target community and
On 07.03.2012 09:43, Igor Ybema wrote:
[igor@vds ~]$ host -t A www.facebook.com ns1.facebook.com
Using domain server:
Name: ns1.facebook.com
Address: 204.74.66.132#53
Aliases:
www.facebook.com has no A record
We also picked up problems with www.facebook.com from our monitoring
systems.
Good point Octavio . +trace with dig is always useful when getting weird
results.
(Sent from my mobile device)
Anurag Bhatia
http://anuragbhatia.com
On Mar 7, 2012 1:19 PM, Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:43:07 -0800, Igor Ybema i...@ergens.org wrote:
On (2012-03-07 07:07 +), Leigh Porter wrote:
What's the nicest way of allowing the ops servers all talk to each VPN
instance? At the moment I just us pretty normal L3VPN techniques so that
every VPN sees routes tagged with the ops VPN target community and so that
the ops VPN sees all
You seem to have skipped a calendar page.
Bjørn
On the other hand, if you hop into other people's Huawei
routers via CLI you will curse and scream. As close as I
could tell, it handles most functionality of IOS, but
they tried to find a synonym for every word cisco used
in the cli.
This does occasionally brighten up my day with gems like
On 7 Mar 2012, at 09:48, Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org wrote:
On the other hand, if you hop into other people's Huawei
routers via CLI you will curse and scream. As close as I
could tell, it handles most functionality of IOS, but
they tried to find a synonym for every word cisco used
in the
On (2012-03-07 09:46 -), Tim Franklin wrote:
This does occasionally brighten up my day with gems like rip no work and
reset-recycle-bin, so it's not all bad :)
I liked how ssh is secure-telnet, took bit head scratching to enable ssh.
But again, I don't think crappy or good CLI is very
On 07/03/2012 10:31, Saku Ytti wrote:
But again, I don't think crappy or good CLI is very important matter, when
using systems.
it isn't - if you're large enough that you have an automated provisioning
system. Most of us aren't in that category though, and for those who
aren't, it's the L3
On 27 February 2012 23:23, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
I think you're more likely to find a network engineer with (possibly
limited) programming skills.
That's certainly where I would categorize myself.
And you're the
On 3/7/2012 4:55 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
it isn't - if you're large enough that you have an automated
provisioning system. Most of us aren't in that category though, and
for those who aren't, it's the L3 tech people who will be doing the
product evaluation and who will end up loathing the kit
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Alan Bryant wrote:
We have two switches that do not seem to be passing VLAN traffic. The
two switches are a Dell Powerconnect 5324 a Cisco 3560G. The Cisco
switch appears to be functioning fine, but the Dell switch is only
passing traffic to the Cisco that is on the default
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Greg T. Grimes wrote:
pruned. If it's not there then it's being pruned. Also on your Dell uplink
add the following line to the uplink port:
switchport access vlan add 12,22
Probably should be
switchport trunk allowed vlan add xxx,xxx tagged
if you're trying to limit
Nuff said?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA
- Original Message -
From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi
On (2012-03-07 09:46 -), Tim Franklin wrote:
This does occasionally brighten up my day with gems like rip no
work and reset-recycle-bin, so it's not all bad :)
I liked how ssh is secure-telnet, took bit head scratching to
are you a PhD? otherwise you are not making sence
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17 PM
Subject: PLEASE don't feed the troll
Nuff said?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
-Original Message-
From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
Sent: 07 March 2012 15:28
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Huawei edge routers..
- Original Message -
From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi
On (2012-03-07 09:46 -), Tim Franklin wrote:
This does occasionally
On 7 March 2012 15:25, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi
On (2012-03-07 09:46 -), Tim Franklin wrote:
This does occasionally brighten up my day with gems like rip no
work and reset-recycle-bin, so it's not all bad :)
On 3/7/2012 9:32 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
I liked how ssh is secure-telnet, took bit head scratching to enable
ssh.
That is, of course, incorrect; there is actually a secure telnet;
ISTR it's telnet-over-ssl?
How do you enable SSH then?
It may be incorrect terminology, but it is actually ssh
How can I easily view the current peering relationship of a particular AS?
Assume the AS you are researching does not have a looking glass and you are
not going to do lookups from the top 10 providers route servers to get some
glimpse of their connectivity. In my particular search
Hi Radke
You can try http://bgp.he.net
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Radke, Justin jra...@canbytel.com wrote:
How can I easily view the current peering relationship of a particular AS?
Assume the AS you are researching does not have a looking glass and you are
not going to do lookups from
At 09:29 07/03/2012 -0800, Radke, Justin wrote:
How can I easily view the current peering relationship of a particular AS?
Assume the AS you are researching does not have a looking glass and you are
not going to do lookups from the top 10 providers route servers to get some
glimpse of their
On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Try: http://www.fixedorbit.com/search.htm and do an ASN search.
-Hank
Is that info supposed to be current? It's wildly out of date for us (35970).
bgp.he.net has all the correct information.
--Chris
On 08/03/2012, Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
Hi Radke
You can try http://bgp.he.net
Example:
http://bgp.he.net/AS4739
Guest login here:
http://peeringdb.com/
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Radke, Justin jra...@canbytel.com wrote:
How can I easily view the current peering
All great answers! Thank you!
-=JGR
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:35 AM, David Walker davidianwal...@gmail.comwrote:
On 08/03/2012, Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
Hi Radke
You can try http://bgp.he.net
Example:
http://bgp.he.net/AS4739
Guest login here:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:22:56 CST, Jack Bates said:
]undo ssh server compatible-ssh1x enable
Ouch. That's brutal. Is it true that setting isn't listed under 'display ssh
server status'?
pgpMgrleE80ON.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:29:29AM -0800, Radke, Justin wrote:
How can I easily view the current peering relationship of a particular AS?
Assume the AS you are researching does not have a looking glass and you are
not going to do lookups from the top 10 providers route servers to get some
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Joe Provo nanog-p...@rsuc.gweep.netwrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:29:29AM -0800, Radke, Justin wrote:
How can I easily view the current peering relationship of a particular
AS?
Assume the AS you are researching does not have a looking glass and you
are
On 3/7/2012 1:08 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:22:56 CST, Jack Bates said:
]undo ssh server compatible-ssh1x enable
Ouch. That's brutal. Is it true that setting isn't listed under 'display ssh
server status'?
]ssh server compat enable
]display ssh server status
On Mar 7, 2012, at 2:55 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 07/03/2012 10:31, Saku Ytti wrote:
But again, I don't think crappy or good CLI is very important matter, when
using systems.
it isn't - if you're large enough that you have an automated provisioning
system. Most of us aren't in that
Anyone else see a massive increase of scanning/dos with TCP source and/or
dst port of 0? We started seeing a massive increase today creating some
issue with our firewalls.
Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd
Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577
OTA Management
I just scanned through the last 48 hours of logs and did not find anything.
We are peering with Level3 (AS 3549) and Verizon (AS 11486).
--
Michael Gatti
main. 949.371.5474
(UTC -8)
On Mar 7, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Matthew Huff wrote:
Anyone else see a massive increase of scanning/dos with
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote:
Anyone else see a massive increase of scanning/dos with TCP source and/or
dst port of 0? We started seeing a massive increase today creating some
issue with our firewalls.
srs/dst of 0 as measured how? (tcpdump? netflow? app
On 03/07/2012 01:29 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote:
Anyone else see a massive increase of scanning/dos with TCP source and/or
dst port of 0? We started seeing a massive increase today creating some
issue with our firewalls.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, John van Oppen jvanop...@spectrumnet.uswrote:
All -
I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed from
cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)... anyone know
anything about this?We noticed this recently in a
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote:
Anyone else see a massive increase of scanning/dos with TCP source and/or
dst port of 0? We started seeing a massive increase today creating some
issue with our firewalls.
Not seeing a ton of them, but do see a few logged on most
Out of curiosity -
Is it possible it's a command and control network, rather than
directly an attack?
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Chris Stone axi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote:
Anyone else see a massive increase of scanning/dos with
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jim Cowie co...@renesys.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, John van Oppen jvanop...@spectrumnet.us
wrote:
All -
I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed
from
cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or
http://www.outages.org/index.php/Anything_you_might_want_to_know_about_ab
s_exercises
Mark V Shaney must have an account @ Outages
~JasonG
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 17:55, Greg Chalmers gchalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jim Cowie co...@renesys.com wrote:
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2012/03/cogent-depeers-china-telecom.shtml
cheers, --jim
Isn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on
On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:19, Darius Jahandarie djahanda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 17:55, Greg Chalmers gchalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on speculation..
- Greg
Now all they need to do is link back to this NANOG thread as a
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.netwrote:
On Mar 7, 2012, at 18:29 , Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:19, Darius Jahandarie djahanda...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 17:55, Greg Chalmers gchalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Isn't this
On Mar 7, 2012, at 19:06 , Jim Cowie wrote:
As a meta-comment: this Quick Look style of blog is an experiment we're
trying, based on feedback that the community wanted to hear about more of
these little events as they happen. In a Quick Look, we're giving the facts
as they are known from
On 03/07/12 16:10, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 7, 2012, at 19:06 , Jim Cowie wrote:
As a meta-comment: this Quick Look style of blog is an experiment we're
trying, based on feedback that the community wanted to hear about more of these little
events as they happen. In a Quick Look,
Hopefully someone here has wrestled with serial server oddities and can
shed some light on this...
I've got a serial console server made by Digi (TS8 PortServer) setup in
a fairly vanilla mode: 9600-8-N-1telnet to port 500X gets you to
port X. Setup for a vt100 terminal type. Other VTs
-Original Message-
From: ML [mailto:m...@kenweb.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 5:32 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Digi TS8 serial console server funkiness
Problem is when attached to a Cisco switch I had laying around I get
seemily random garble output when accessing the
Other issues I've noticed..cannot use arrow keys to search command
buffer.
This is going to be a tougher one. Might be a difference in character
encoding. Here is the VT100 spec:
http://www.handshake.de/infobase/dfue/prgrmmer/t322.htm
* ESC D cursor down - at bottom of
Isabel -
It does not take a PhD in computer science to understand networks or
network protocol design. It does not take a PhD to understand that
the troll's particular proposal was not a competent well-founded
contribution.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:25 AM, isabel dias isabeldi...@yahoo.com
They had issues in Europe today:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/9128716/Facebook-hit-by-two-h
our-blackout.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/facebook-back-up-after-eur
ope-outage/2012/03/07/gIQAJnNuwR_story.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Anurag
49 matches
Mail list logo
