Subject: Re: Big Temporary Networks Date: Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:40:02AM -0400
Quoting Jay Ashworth (j...@baylink.com):
- Original Message -
From: Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.org
12:20:33AM -0700 Quoting Octavio Alvarez (alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org):
I'd have expected
On 13 Sep 2012, at 17:32, Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org wrote:
You'll need a beefy NAT box. Linux with Xeon CPU and 4GB RAM minimum.
Or not. The CCC presentation is showing *real* Internet for everyone, unless
I'm very much mistaken…
Absolutely. NAT is too fragile/expensive/non-performant
Mans Nilsson wrote:
Do not NAT. When all those people want to do social networking to the same
furry BBS while also frequenting three social app sites simultaneously
you are going to get Issues if you NAT. So don't.
I am not suggesting that. I'm just trying to point out that there
might be
On 9/15/12, Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp wrote:
Mans Nilsson wrote:
I am not suggesting that. I'm just trying to point out that there
might be a bunch of assumptions that aren't as true anymore when a
lot of client connections share both source and destination address,
and
- Original Message -
From: Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.org
It would still be nice to multicast them inside our network (and out
to whomever wants to watch), but what the heck's the consumer-level
client side of multicast video streaming look like these days?
IIRC a number
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
You're saying that *receiving* multicast streams over WLAN works poorly?
I don't have any experience with it, but here's what Google told me:
http://www.wireless-nets.com/resources/tutorials/802.11_multicasting.html
When any
- Original Message -
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
You're saying that *receiving* multicast streams over WLAN works
poorly?
I don't have any experience with it, but here's what Google told me:
Jay Ashworth wrote:
You're saying that *receiving* multicast streams over WLAN works poorly?
Multicast/broadcast over congested WLAN works poorly, because
there can be no ACK.
That is, multicast/broadcast packets lost by collisions are
never sent again.
8 matches
Mail list logo