Huasong Zhou huas...@kalorama.com writes:
We got this modem and router all in one box from Comcast directly.
OK, so the NAT is taking place in the router you got from Comcast, not
in Carrier Grade NAT in Comcast's network. A fine distinction but an
important one. The external address of your
On 9-4-2013 1:10, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Huasong Zhou huas...@kalorama.com
We got this modem and router all in one box from Comcast directly. And
by the way, home use routers don't assign 10.0.0.0 numbers.
I have seen consumer NAT routers assign addresses
Quoting:
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 09:31:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se
To: nanog list nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Fabien Delmotte wrote:
CGN is just a solution to save time, it is not a transition mechanism
through
Jared,
If you mean there can be a referral with RCODE=0 and Recursion Available
= 0, you'll need a third column actually documenting if there is a
referral.
This server is listed in ORP:
$ dig www.google.be @195.160.166.139
; DiG 9.7.3 www.google.be @195.160.166.139
;; global options: +cmd
http://www.gizmag.com/cudos-fiber-optic-network-capacity/26969/
Closing the gap to improve the capacity of existing fiber optic networks
By Darren Quick
April 7, 2013
Researchers claim to have increased the data capacity of optical networks to
the point that all of the world’s internet
Hi,
rant
it seems that many large providers are using cloudmark services. As far as I
can tell: their policy is unclear, they can hardly be reached, mails to support
are bouncing (delayed, then bounce).
yes, the mailserver from one of our customers was blocked and this was OK and
rightful,
Can someone point me to IPFIX analysers that do automatic learning of
traffic patterns, raise events as suspected dos, and when operator marked
as false positive, won't trigger that pattern anymore?
This should be without configuring any explicit network ranges anywhere. So
when I do get new
On 2013-04-09 10:27, Chris Conn wrote:
Hi,
rant
it seems that many large providers are using cloudmark services. As far as I
can tell: their policy is unclear, they can hardly be reached, mails to support
are bouncing (delayed, then bounce).
yes, the mailserver from one of our customers was
On 4/8/13 9:23 PM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 4/8/13 5:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Apr 7, 2013, at 18:45 , Huasong Zhou huas...@kalorama.com wrote:
We got this modem and router all in one box from Comcast directly. And
by the way, home use routers don't assign 10.0.0.0
On 4/7/13 9:45 PM, Huasong Zhou huas...@kalorama.com wrote:
We got this modem and router all in one box from Comcast directly. And by
the way, home use routers don't assign 10.0.0.0 numbers.
Sure they can. And I'm sure if you checked the WAN interface of the device
it has a public IPv4 address.
Reminder- the RFP closed yesterday but we will continue to accept
submissions through the end of the week.
Regards,
-Dave
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:47 AM, David Temkin d...@temk.in wrote:
Just a reminder that the RFP is still open for NANOG 58!
Regards,
-Dave
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:02
On 9 April 2013 15:09, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
...
“Our approach is so flexible, network operators could adjust capacity to
respond to increased demand, for example from people following big sport
events like the Olympics, added Dr Schröder.
As a Internet user: We want more
WFLA TV reports that Tampa Fire is working a hazmat call at 400 N Tampa.
http://www.wfla.com/story/21920646/hazmat-situation-in-downtown-tampa
Park Tower is the carrier hotel for Tampa Bay; there are about 13 carriers
in that building, at least 9 of which have major POPs and xconn there.
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:31:08 -0400
From: Chris Conn cc...@b2b2c.ca
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: cloudmark?
Message-ID: 5164262c.3070...@b2b2c.ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 2013-04-09 10:27, Chris Conn wrote:
(...)
Your experience does not
Hi Carlos, list,
Today I entered to networksolutions.com and I remembered this
thread. I had to administer a domain name and I sadly found they have
done nothing in IPv6 during the last 12 month.
Regards,
^Ao$
On 3/28/12, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo carlosm3...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I
Hi,
At least I know the infrastructure is not ready to accept IPv6 for
NS registration.
I tried with NetSol and GoD.
Which remind me... I'm still waiting on my NSx.BCP38.ORG from GoD?
Grr... (hate when someone is right)
-
Alain Hebert
You have a choice of registrars. If you don't like the one you are using right
now, choose a different one. There are lots to choose from.
http://www.icann.org/registrar-reports/accredited-list.html
Joe
Sent from my Ono-Sendai Cyberspace 7
On 2013-04-10, at 2:42, Alejandro Acosta
Tom,
The main criteria is the RCODE=0 vs RCODE=5 refused.
I exposed the Recursion Available bit this last week to cover more of the use
cases, but many servers provide a very large referral to root.
You are correct in that your system doesn't provide that so should be less
visible as a
In the last 2 weeks we have seen double the amount of ddos attacks, and way
bigger then normal. All of them being amplification attacks. I think the
media whoring done during the spamhaus debacle motivated more people to
invest time building up there openresolver list, since really no one has
Not accepting is just about as bad as not accepting A records.
You wouldn't certify a registrar if they couldn't update A records.
It's about time certification was lost for failure to handle
records. The same should also apply for DS records.
In message
Yo Mark!
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:23:34 +1000
Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Not accepting is just about as bad as not accepting A records.
You wouldn't certify a registrar if they couldn't update A records.
It's about time certification was lost for failure to handle
records.
On 4/9/13 4:23 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
It's about time certification was lost for failure to handle
records. The same should also apply for DS records.
You can suggest this to the compliance team. It seems to me (registrar
hat == on) that in 2.5 years time, when Staff next conducts a
The IANA AS Numbers registry has been updated to reflect the allocation
of 1 block to LACNIC in 2013-04-08:
61440-62463
You can find the IANA AS Numbers registry at:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/as-numbers.xml
Regards,
Selina Harrington
IANA Request Specialist
ICANN
There's also bandwidthd which can be added to the list. Nfsen is the front end
for nfdump (much like SiLK) with graphs and it has plugins to graph port usage,
etc.
On Apr 9, 2013, at 4:51 AM, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Do you know any opensource program
I said all of this years ago as a suggestion for the next round of contract
renewals (since I was told that it had to be added to the contracts first).
Best of luck. Personally, I think it should have been a requirement at least
5 years ago.
Owen
On Apr 9, 2013, at 16:48 , Eric Brunner-Williams
Can you point is at the right address or form to submit regarding this? Seems
like its time for both on and DS.
Jared Mauch
On Apr 9, 2013, at 7:48 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams brun...@nic-naa.net wrote:
On 4/9/13 4:23 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
It's about time certification was lost for
Martin,
I sent you this email from our corporate email, and haven't heard back. Did you
receive this?
Regards,
Bryan Williams
Sr. Solutions Architect
Cloudmark, Inc
From: Bryan Williams bwilli...@cloudmark.commailto:bwilli...@cloudmark.com
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 12:58 PM
To:
On 4/9/13 5:39 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I said all of this years ago as a suggestion for the next round of contract
renewals (since I was told that it had to be added to the contracts first).
Best of luck. Personally, I think it should have been a requirement at least
5 years ago.
And exactly
On 4/9/13 5:47 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Can you point is at the right address or form to submit regarding this? Seems
like its time for both on and DS.
Jared,
Joe is an employee of the corporation, a rather high ranking one. As I
mentioned in my response to Mark, he _may_ be in a position
Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
[...]
Joe is an employee of the corporation, a rather high ranking one. As I
mentioned in my response to Mark, he _may_ be in a position to
encourage both legal to develop new language for future addition to
the RAA, and the Registrar Liaison to socialize the
Bryan,
nope, it didn't make it through to my inbox . I try to contact you through
other channels.
Martin
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:41:42 +
From: Bryan Williams bwilli...@cloudmark.com
To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Subject: NANOG - csi reset request
Message-ID:
In message 5648a8908ccb564ebf46e2bc904a75b15ff1684...@exvpmbx100-1.exc.icann.o
rg, Leo Vegoda writes:
Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
[...]
Joe is an employee of the corporation, a rather high ranking one. As I
mentioned in my response to Mark, he _may_ be in a position to
encourage
On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:56 pm, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
[…]
There are multiple documents to read and you can find them all here.
https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-07mar13-en.htm
If anyone has specific questions about the draft RAA, they should
contact
33 matches
Mail list logo
