Dear all,
We have built a tool that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the
interdomain level.
The tool is available at *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/* and you can use
it to retrieve the Limited Visibility Prefixes (LVPs) (i.e., prefixes
that are not present in all the global routing
On May 14, 2013, Jean-Francois Mezei jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca wrote:
But when traffic from a cahe server flows directly into an ISP's intranet
to end users, it doesn't really make use of the Internet nor does it cost
the ISP transit capacity.
Compare this to a small ISP in a city where there
Pretty nice. Thanks!
I don't suppose there is any straight text version of all this info is there ?
--
Jason Hellenthal
IST Services Professional
Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net
JJH48-ARIN
On May 15, 2013, at 6:22, Andra Lutu andra.l...@imdea.org wrote:
Dear all,
We have built a tool
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:14:56PM -0400, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
On 13-05-14 20:55, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Since when is peering not part of the Internet?
Yes, one car argue that an device with an IP address routable from the
internet is part of the internet.
But when traffic
Hi,
Anyone knows of any public CDN server log trace. I am looking for object
popularity, hit rate information, ...
Thanks, Djamel
Hi Jason,
Thank you for your email! We are glad to hear that you like the work!
At the moment, you can only query the webpage and retrieve the LVPs per
origin AS.
We haven't yet considered giving the option of downloading the complete
report.
We are now working on a new version of the tool,
On 5/15/13 3:00 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Pretty nice. Thanks!
I don't suppose there is any straight text version of all this info is there ?
At the RIPE NCC we are publishing aggregated dumps from our collective
of 12 RIS route collectors every 8 hours. For each prefix we list the
origin
Awesome! Thank you to you as well!
--
Jason Hellenthal
IST Services Professional
Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net
JJH48-ARIN
On May 15, 2013, at 11:01, Rene Wilhelm wilh...@ripe.net wrote:
On 5/15/13 3:00 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Pretty nice. Thanks!
I don't suppose there is any
Hello all,
I'll spare you the details, but we are in need of some
means to temporarily get a copper interface on at least one of our 4900M
switches to narrow down a network performance issue.
Does anyone have
a 4900M half card with copper ports, or a Cisco TwinGig X2 adapter in
the Chicago
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Glen Kent glen.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to understand the scenarios wherein the service
provider/network admin might run both ISIS and OSPF together inside their
network. Is this something that really happens out there?
One scenario that i can think
On 13-05-15 06:24, ja...@towardex.com wrote:
We're a small ISP and we reach lot of content via peering just fine. Lot of
these contents that you speak of (Netflix, Akamai, et al) have open peering
policies and are present in more exchange points than anybody else.
Not all ISPs are fortunate
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jean-Francois Mezei
jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca wrote:
On 13-05-15 06:24, ja...@towardex.com wrote:
We're a small ISP and we reach lot of content via peering just fine. Lot of
these contents that you speak of (Netflix, Akamai, et al) have open peering
On 13-05-15 09:02, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
So it's only on the Internet if it uses a provider's transit capacity?
I made the statement in a context of the internet is crumbling under
the Netflix load. There have been many media reports over the years of
the internet unable to cope with the
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei
jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca wrote:
On 13-05-15 09:02, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
So it's only on the Internet if it uses a provider's transit capacity?
I made the statement in a context of the internet is crumbling under
the Netflix load.
On Wed, 15 May 2013 11:46:36 -0400, Jean-Francois Mezei said:
Not all ISPs are fortunate enough to be in a town where there is an
active exchange with Netflix/Akamai/Google presence.
For instance, Montréal just recently oopened a peering exchange. While
this will eventually allow local ISPs
Not all ISPs are fortunate enough to be in a town where there is an active
exchange with Netflix/Akamai/Google presence.
For instance, Montréal just recently oopened a peering exchange. While
this will eventually allow local ISPs to peer with
the big content providers, until this happens,
I'd also suggest looking at NetFlow Auditor:
http://www.netflowauditor.com/
I think it will do all of those except AS path analysis.
Another good option might also be the InterNAP FCP, which does all of that
PLUS optimizes routing based on the data (can also be deployed in a preview
mode):
On May 15, 2013, at 09:59 , Jean-Francois Mezei jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca
wrote:
On 13-05-15 09:02, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
So it's only on the Internet if it uses a provider's transit capacity?
All of this is leading me to the following conclusion:
If we, as network engineers can't
I can vouch for the FCP. I haven't used their newer platforms but the
device worked very well.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Scott Berkman sc...@sberkman.net wrote:
I'd also suggest looking at NetFlow Auditor:
http://www.netflowauditor.com/
I think it will do all of those except AS
On 13-05-15 14:07, Owen DeLong wrote:
If we, as network engineers can't agree on the nature and definition of the
internet,
how can we possibly expect the media to understand it?
When someone cuts a cable in the meditarenean, the media doesn't say
the internet has crawled to a snail's pace,
Anyone-
We are having a bit of trouble with spamcop blocking 2 of our MTAs with IPs of
208.65.145.71 and 208.65.145.66. We have yet to receive any samples of the spam
and do not seem to be able to submit for removal as it appears someone has
attempted to do this for us and basically used up
This is probably much more appropriate over on mailop; please see:
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
I don't recall offhand is any Spamcop personnel hang out there, but
it's plausible to think they might.
---rsk
Sent from my iPhone
On May 12, 2013, at 1:41 AM, Glen Kent glen.k...@gmail.com wrote:
The other instance would be when say OSPF is used to manage the OOB network
and the ISIS is used for network reachability.
Is there any other scenario?
Yes, in virtualization world , where people no
Now it's public :)
The new Network Engineering Stack Exchange site is now open to the public!
After just 8 days in private beta, we've already got 451 users who have
asked 99 questions and written 258 answers. We're off to a good start, and
it's time to unleash this baby on the public and
24 matches
Mail list logo
