Is anyone using an open source solution to process netflow v9 captures?
I'm waiting for SiLK v3 for some time now, which is currently only available
for TLA's and Universities.
Currently looking into nfdump.
Tim
On May 17, 2013, at 12:16 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
Does anyone know of a netflow
Fraunhofer:
http://www.iaf.fraunhofer.de/de/news-medien/pressemitteilungen/presse-2013-05-16.html
Google Translate:
New world record in data transmission by radio
Press Release 16/05/2013
With a Langstreckendemonstrator between two skyscrapers in Karlsruhe, a
distance of over a kilometer
Congrats! How does 240Ghz react to atmospheric conditions other than clear
skys?
On May 17, 2013 4:17 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
Fraunhofer:
http://www.iaf.fraunhofer.de/de/news-medien/pressemitteilungen/presse-2013-05-16.html
Google Translate:
New world record in data
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=arnumber=1139451url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D1139451
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Phil Fagan [mailto:philfa...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 17 mei 2013 13:32
Aan: Eugen Leitl
CC: NANOG
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Tim Vollebregt wrote:
Is anyone using an open source solution to process netflow v9 captures?
I'm waiting for SiLK v3 for some time now, which is currently only available
for TLA's and Universities.
pmacct does this pretty nicely (along with a
Check out argus http://www.qosient.com/argus/
Netflow v9 support was added within the last few months.
Cheers,
Harry
On 05/17/2013 06:11 AM, Tim Vollebregt wrote:
Is anyone using an open source solution to process netflow v9 captures?
I'm waiting for SiLK v3 for some time now, which is
By not working. At those frequencies you're talking a light moisture pocket
taking the entire link down.
Sent from my Mobile Device.
Original message
From: Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com
Date: 05/17/2013 4:36 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org
Cc: NANOG
These links are impressive, but I think this kind of stuff was designed for
outer space.
Sent from my Mobile Device.
Original message
From: Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com
Date: 05/17/2013 4:36 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject:
On May 17, 2013, at 16:30, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
By not working. At those frequencies you're talking a light moisture pocket
taking the entire link down.
Not quite as bad:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:22 -0700, Scott Weeks said:
You haven't been here long have you...
He DOES NOT need a 260 word signature (see below!) to make sure he does
not get UCE from posting to NANOG.
Actually, I think Thomas Cannon was making the opposite point - that if
he's going to spam
Thomas,
We saw some instability this morning around 2:53am (EST) that resulted in
practically complete communication failure in our Detroit colo. It lasted
approximately 45 minutes and service was restored rather gradually.
---
Brandon Lehmann CCNA, CCAI, CFOT, Net+, A+, Security+
BitRadius,
I disagree.
It's not the near field stuff that is an issue.. It's the far field stuff
further down the road that is going to murder the link.. Look at his Fig 1
and Fig 2.
Fig 1 is saying that he is getting killed at 50mm/h of rain at 60 gig and
at 175 gig. Fig 2 is saying that everything works
Well put; 1kM is a giant leap from .1Km, but its a far cry from rural
transport.
I wonder what the fixed mobile/metro use cases might look like; Alternate
path, aggregate short distance media backhaul...
I think I like the idea most for non-earth atmosphere use cases, space
vehicle or
Super high frequency stuff is already in space. Iridium uses ka for their space
craft to space craft routing network. Not much attenuation in a vacuum.. ;)
Look up vortex beams. These guys should hook up with the vortex guys. They were
getting like 40bits to hertz using oam.
Sent from my
Nice...8x300Gbit optical beams; that's awesome.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
Super high frequency stuff is already in space. Iridium uses ka for
their space craft to space craft routing network. Not much attenuation in a
Yeah, the orbital in addition to spin is pretty ground breaking. The pictures
of the actual light are jaw dropping. And I'm not sure they actually found the
limit, they just tested to whatever they had gear for.
Sent from my Mobile Device.
Original message
From: Phil Fagan
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
On May 17, 2013, at 8:24 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:22 -0700, Scott Weeks said:
You haven't been here long have you...
He DOES NOT need a 260 word signature (see below!) to make sure he does
not get UCE from posting to NANOG.
Actually, I think Thomas
Well put.
On May 17, 2013 1:54 PM, John Starta j...@starta.org wrote:
On May 17, 2013, at 8:24 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:22 -0700, Scott Weeks said:
You haven't been here long have you...
He DOES NOT need a 260 word signature (see below!) to make
On May 17, 2013 1:54 PM, John Starta j...@starta.org wrote:
On May 17, 2013, at 8:24 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:22 -0700, Scott Weeks said:
He DOES NOT need a 260 word signature (see below!) to make sure he does
not get UCE from posting to NANOG.
This report has been generated at Fri May 17 21:13:20 2013 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 09-May-13 -to- 16-May-13 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS36998 211390 9.9% 277.4 -- SDN-MOBITEL
2 - AS982946479 2.2% 45.9 --
I recall a message a while back about a company that offered remote hands
nation-wide, but my Google-Fu is failing me.
Any pointers?
We basically need to find coverage for eastern Washington State and all of
Oregon.
-A
On 5/17/2013 8:00 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
I recall a message a while back about a company that offered remote hands
nation-wide, but my Google-Fu is failing me.
Any pointers?
We basically need to find coverage for eastern Washington State and all of
Oregon.
-A
Perhaps Ledcor?
has anyone come by documents containing some statistics regarding leading
causes for cuts in fiber, power, cable lines?
I seem to remember one which included % cuts due to equipment failure,
maintenance, weather, rodents, boring, car accidents, etc.
but alas, I cannot find it in my archives.
On 5/10/2013 9:56 AM, Jerimiah Cole wrote:
On 05/08/2013 09:21 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
Ciena/Cyan/etc are way over our non-existant budget... what is the
going recommendation to throw say 4-8 lambdas over a dark pair without
breaking the bank? :)
I've used http://www.omnitron-systems.com/
On 5/17/2013 22:16, Kyle Creyts wrote:
has anyone come by documents containing some statistics regarding leading
causes for cuts in fiber, power, cable lines?
I seem to remember one which included % cuts due to equipment failure,
maintenance, weather, rodents, boring, car accidents, etc.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:18:34PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
On 5/10/2013 9:56 AM, Jerimiah Cole wrote:
On 05/08/2013 09:21 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
Ciena/Cyan/etc are way over our non-existant budget... what is the
going recommendation to throw say 4-8 lambdas over a dark pair without
28 matches
Mail list logo
