We found we got leap seconds added on some systems over the weekend. There
were no leap seconds planned (
http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/earth-orientation/leap-second-announcement),
however some of our systems got one.
We run our own s2/s3/s4 system, with only the s2s going to the Internet.
We
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Todd S t...@borked.ca wrote:
We found we got leap seconds added on some systems over the weekend. There
were no leap seconds planned (
http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/earth-orientation/leap-second-announcement),
however some of our systems got one.
We run our
I saw alerts from Symmetricom about it for their NTP hardware, and got
notified from Infoblox also.
Relevant links:
http://www.symmetricom.com/media/files/downloads/leap-second/S200_S250_SyncServer_Leap_Second_SRN_v1.30.pdf
Subject: Leap Second Date: Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:23:58AM -0400 Quoting Todd S
(t...@borked.ca):
We found we got leap seconds added on some systems over the weekend. There
were no leap seconds planned (
http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/earth-orientation/leap-second-announcement),
however some
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Michael Loftis mlof...@wgops.com wrote:
Had a leap happen here on the 30th. My stratum 1 source is a CDMA
timekeeper, I'll ping the operator of it and see if he knows anything or if
it logged anything. It's probably not isolated at all since all my S2
My S2s are Symmetricoms, so we may have a winner here.
Cheers!
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.orgwrote:
Subject: Leap Second Date: Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:23:58AM -0400 Quoting
Todd S (t...@borked.ca):
We found we got leap seconds added on some systems
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/ipmi/
Capsule summary: watch out!
--Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
On 2013-07-02 16:51 , Steven Bellovin wrote:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/ipmi/
Capsule summary: watch out!
Indeed! But it is should be logical, as IPMI is supposed to be for OOB
access right? :)
Anybody not putting them behind a properly restricted firewall and/or
VLAN is asking
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.eduwrote:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/ipmi/
Capsule summary: watch out!
--Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Dan Farmer wrote a really nice paper on this subject, complete with
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jer...@massar.ch]
On 2013-07-02 16:51 , Steven Bellovin wrote:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/ipmi/
Capsule summary: watch out!
Indeed! But it is should be logical, as IPMI is supposed to be for OOB
access right? :)
Anybody not putting them
On 2013-07-02 17:54 , Jamie Bowden wrote:
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jer...@massar.ch]
On 2013-07-02 16:51 , Steven Bellovin wrote:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/ipmi/
Capsule summary: watch out!
Indeed! But it is should be logical, as IPMI is supposed to be for OOB
access
On Tue 2013-07-02T10:23:58 -0400, Todd S hath writ:
Anyone else run in to this, or have any further intel about servers that
advertised the leap second?
David Malone has been monitoring the NTP pool for years. See his plots
http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwmalone/time/leaps/
This time pool was
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:58:16 +0200, Jeroen Massar said:
On 2013-07-02 17:54 , Jamie Bowden wrote:
That same reasoning has worked wonders at keeping SCADA systems off the
public internet too.
People problems cannot be resolved with code.
Would an Linux cluebat driver count? :)
On (2013-06-29 23:36 +0100), Tony Finch wrote:
Reminds me of MinimaLT: http://cr.yp.to/tcpip/minimalt-20130522.pdf
Now that I read separate 'QUIC Crypto' page. It sounds bit of a deja vu.
QUIC also uses Curve25519 pubkey and Salsa20 cipher, which is hard to
attribute as chance, considering
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-06-29 23:36 +0100), Tony Finch wrote:
Reminds me of MinimaLT: http://cr.yp.to/tcpip/minimalt-20130522.pdf
Now that I read separate 'QUIC Crypto' page. It sounds bit of a deja vu.
QUIC also uses Curve25519 pubkey and
So I've got a bunch of Ciena 6200 kit in, with some of their professional
services folks onsite, helping with the initial setup. I know nothing of this
kit, other than from what I'm being told, it's pretty bleeding edge, so much so
that not even many people at Ciena know how to use it.
The SE
On 7/2/2013 6:30 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
So I've got a bunch of Ciena 6200 kit in, with some of their professional
services folks onsite, helping with the initial setup. I know nothing of this
kit, other than from what I'm being told, it's pretty bleeding edge, so much so
that not even many
On 7/2/2013 4:30 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
The SE who's onsite is apparently claiming that there is no provision
to set a default gateway on the management interface. This seems odd
to me.
Me too, which is why I've got a call in to another company regarding
their management LAN port that I
it's probably fair to point out that practically all optical vendors
don't actually understand 'ip' and 'routing' and 'systems management'
... try doing ntp with ONS boxes? got ntpv1? then ... oops :(
never mind the situations where you install a 0/0 route on a
management interface/config and
careful there may be a troll in here... :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.nyc
As of July 2, 2013, .nyc has been approved by ICANN as a
city-level top-level domain (TLD) for New York City
As places like that see $186,000 as small change, I wonder
what other countries (much less the cities
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
careful there may be a troll in here... :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.nyc
As of July 2, 2013, .nyc has been approved by ICANN as a
city-level top-level domain (TLD) for New York City
.nyc has been approved
Thank you Rubens, you saved me the effort.
Eric
--- rube...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com
As places like that see $186,000 as small change, I wonder
what other countries (much less the cities within them)
like .nu, .sb or .vu will do? For them this is an
astronomical number. Someone's about to hit a financial
home
My Google fu is failing. Can anybody point me to a script that will create DNS
entries from router snmp info?
Jensen Tyler
Sr Engineering Manager
Fiberutilities Group, LLC
I haven't read enough, but what's to stop speculators
paying the $186,000 then ...
Rather than asking random strangers, you can read the applicant
guidebook and find out what the actual rules are:
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb
--- jo...@iecc.com wrote:
From: John Levine jo...@iecc.com
I haven't read enough, but what's to stop speculators
paying the $186,000 then ...
Rather than asking random strangers, you can read the applicant
guidebook and find out what the actual rules are:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
Ok, you're correct. I need to add that to my list of reading.
I am just thinking about the digital divide getting larger
(not smaller) as these places are writing about on their
various technical mailing lists. That
On 7/2/13 7:06 PM, John Levine wrote:
Rather than asking random strangers, you can read the applicant
guidebook and find out what the actual rules are:
There really should be a kinder introduction to those who lack basic
clue than to attempt to read the last version of the DAG, even for the
Thank you for explaining this. Again, probably.
So the cities in those countries could buy them (if they could
afford them) but not the countries? So .portvila is available,
but not .vanuatu?
Yes. Country names will be part of the expansion of the ccTLD space, where
usually countries are
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
Summary: there are residual risks, but the checks and balances of the
process are likely to stop bad actors, at the cost of also stopping some
good actors. Error in the side of caution preferred.
You're missing the
Rather than asking random strangers, you can read the applicant
guidebook and find out what the actual rules are:
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb
Ok, you're correct. I need to add that to my list of reading.
I am just thinking about the digital divide getting larger
(not smaller)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
Summary: there are residual risks, but the checks and balances of the
process are likely to stop bad actors, at the cost of also stopping some
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
From
http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-ii-agenda-2b-25jun13-en.pdf
Registry Operator will periodically conduct a technical analysis to assess
whether domains in the TLD are being used
Makes me wonder if concern for routing table size is worrying about the
right thing.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
Great, Let's see what happens.
If history is any teacher...
There is not much history here to look at... .cc and .tk are ccTLDs, based
out of sovereign states. They are delegated into the root by ICANN (more
precisely by IANA, which is currently a contract also granted to ICANN) and
that's
Now you are thinking. :-)
- ferg
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
Makes me wonder if concern for routing table size is worrying about the
right thing.
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
gTLDs operate under ICANN compliance regime and are required to abide by
community policies. Will this be enough ? We don't know yet, but people have
given some thought trying to find a way it is enough, and can require
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
Makes me wonder if concern for routing table size is worrying about the
right thing.
Because obviously, the problems of scaling router memory and scaling DNS
servers are the same kind?
Yes, having many many new TLDs
On 7/2/2013 11:39 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net
wrote:
Makes me wonder if concern for routing table size is worrying about
the right thing.
Because obviously, the problems of scaling router memory and scaling
DNS servers are
Why does this discussion have to always be one or the other?
We have multiple problems here, friends.
Focus.
- ferg
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Andrew Sullivan asulli...@dyn.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
Makes me wonder if
40 matches
Mail list logo
