Paul S. cont...@winterei.se writes:
For all it's worth, it might be Cox ignoring TTLs and enforcing their
own update times instead.
Wait 24-48 hours, and it should probably fix it all up.
Possibly.
I'm not seeing anything majorly broken with your system except the SOA
EXPIRE being
Hi,
I've been working on a basic configuration for E-OAM starting with one
domain. I have CFM working between the PEs (IOS-XR) devices tied to an
EoMPLS instance, but have a few questions below:
1) I think I should be seeing MIPs in my traceroute when there is a P
router in between the two PEs,
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Is this the *same* bug that just broke in Apple code last week?
No, the Apple bug was the existence of an /extra/ goto fail;.
The GnuTLS bug was that it was /missing/ a goto fail;.
I'm figuring the same developer worked on
Hi folks,
Can anyone tell me about a situation in which a route which was not
valley free was not a result of a misconfiguration or a bad actor? For
those who don't recall the terminology, a network path is valley free
if it crosses exactly zero or one free peering links when traveling
between
On 3/4/14, 2:38 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
Hello all,
Don't suppose there's any CenturyLink engineers/tech people on this list
that can look into a problem with their IPv6 6rd service?
Thanks for the off-list replies. Think I've got the issues figured out.
6rd behaves a lot like 6to4 in how
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:23:55 -0500, William Herrin said:
Hi folks,
Can anyone tell me about a situation in which a route which was not
valley free was not a result of a misconfiguration or a bad actor? For
those who don't recall the terminology, a network path is valley free
if it crosses
- Original Message -
From: Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Is this the *same* bug that just broke in Apple code last week?
No, the Apple bug was the existence of an /extra/ goto fail;.
The GnuTLS bug was that it
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:00 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:23:55 -0500, William Herrin said:
Can anyone tell me about a situation in which a route which was not
valley free was not a result of a misconfiguration or a bad actor? For
those who don't recall the
Thank you to the on and off lists replies. The DNS servers are not my
choice to have them that way. But I will mention that to my client.
It looks like Cox is now resolving things as it should be for this domain.
Sincerely,
Mark Keymer
CFO/COO
Vivio Technologies
On 3/5/2014 4:52 AM, Rob
Doing some serious adjusting of my tinfoil today over his :)
-jim
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Is this the *same*
The AS I worked at back in the day did to a degree for willing parties.
Mostly small ISPs who all knew each other. We had at the time 3 regional
hub locations with interlinks, and peered settlement free with 2 - 3 ASs in
1 of the locations, and 1-2 ASs each in the other 2 locations, all of which
Been spending most of the day scrubbing away that vuln in my facility
here now here's the fun part: imagine just how many embedded devices
(most of which get orphaned from a software maintenance perspective the
moment they hit the store shelves) are gonna have this flaw. There's been
the
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:48:26 +, Siegel, David said:
I can't think of any circumstances where the business B would be content
transit traffic between A and C without some form of compensation. That
compensation may not involve payment for bits, however.
If ASN B is a cooperative venture
I have worked for the middle network when I was responsible for a
government network - typically we were the middle network. Logic was it
was good for citizens for us to essentially act like a peering exchange for
certain types of entity (who also typically were government affiliated).
One I can
- Original Message -
From: Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org
Fun times indeed. Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence...
And for the few who don't recall the last stanza -- and this is looking
less and less by the month like it requires an aluminium foil fedora to
buy as a
15 matches
Mail list logo
