On (2014-09-20 13:32 +0900), Randy Bush wrote:
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/archive/2014/09/msg00049.html
Interesting quote from the paper.
I've sometimes wondered if RIR's do too much, if there is inherent mission
creep to justify increasing revenue due to increasing
Has been running for a while, time to shut ‘er down. She (is a router a she?)
used to handle all of my BGP GigE links but over the years has been demoted to
OSPF and T1 aggregation.
If anyone needs a boat anchor let me know.
gsr8-1#show version
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
On 2014-09-20 16:18, Matthew Crocker wrote:
[..]
IOS (tm) GS Software (GSR-P-M), Version 12.0(30)S3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
[..]
gsr8-1 uptime is 9 years, 9 weeks, 2 days, 8 hours, 39 minutes
Thank you for finally taking a vulnerable system of the Internet!
Greets,
Jeroen
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Matthew Crocker matt...@corp.crocker.com wrote
about his old router:
SNIP/
gsr8-1 uptime is 9 years, 9 weeks, 2 days, 8 hours, 39 minutes
Uptime for this control processor is 9 years, 2 weeks, 2 days, 18 minutes
System returned to ROM by Stateful Switchover at
-48VDC.
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:58 AM, James R Cutler james.cut...@consultant.com
wrote:
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Matthew Crocker matt...@corp.crocker.com
wrote about his old router:
SNIP/
gsr8-1 uptime is 9 years, 9 weeks, 2 days, 8 hours, 39 minutes
Uptime for this control
So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
On Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM, Matthew S. Crocker matt...@corp.crocker.com
wrote:
-48VDC.
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:58 AM, James R Cutler
james.cut...@consultant.com wrote:
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Matthew Crocker
OK thank you for decommissioning this.*
* Only if you either had authority to do so for max 1 year or had no
authority but were fighting to have it patches or replaced for years.
On Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM, Daniel Sterling sterling.dan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:37, Bacon Zombie baconzom...@gmail.com wrote:
So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
Sunday sept 4 2005?
Seems like a good run. If it hasn't been rooted or fallen over since then it's
apparently pretty secure...
On Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM,
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
-b
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie baconzom...@gmail.com wrote:
So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
Isn't the better response, thank you for decommissioning it?
Can someone from cisco set up a poll or release whatever numbers they
have about how many
Again, you're focusing resentment towards someone who did the right
thing. Negative reinforcement will discourage others from taking
action and will discourage them from encouraging others to take
action.
Let's focus on who still has vulnerable equipment and how to help
them. Let's not shame
On Sep 20, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Daniel Sterling sterling.dan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie baconzom...@gmail.com wrote:
So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
Isn't the better response, thank you for decommissioning it?
And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sterling
Sent: Saturday, 20 September, 2014 12:06
To: Bacon Zombie
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Saying goodnight to my GSR
Again, you're focusing resentment
And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
Most of these, I'd imagine:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_0s/release/ntes/120SCAVS.html
On 20 September 2014 14:25, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
-Original Message-
From:
On (2014-09-20 14:25 -0600), Keith Medcalf wrote:
And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
Fair question. Felix Lindner has shown some ~0 budget attacks on IOS. But I'm
not sure if there actually are known attack vectors for properly secured
system (iACL, rACL in this case)
Crash bugs are there
I do not see any vulnerabilities listed there. Only documentation of
behavioral bugs, caveats, and restrictions.
A vulnerability would be something like the one Microsoft introduced into all
versions of the Windows IP stack after Windows 2003 and Windows XP wherein the
Operating System will
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Crocker matt...@corp.crocker.com
Has been running for a while, time to shut ‘er down. She (is a router
a she?) used to handle all of my BGP GigE links but over the years has
been demoted to OSPF and T1 aggregation.
If anyone needs a boat anchor
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
I'm not sure for example, if 11MEUR is needed for number registry personnel
costs, that could give you 100 hostmasters with 5500EUR/month salary, in good
likelihood, we'd be able to run focused number registry with volunteers.
I
I'm not sure for example, if 11GER is needed for number registry personnel
costs, that could give you 100 hostmasters with 5500EUR/month salary, in good
likelihood, we'd be able to run focused number registry with volunteers.
I think your math is off? 11,000,000 / 100 == 110,000 / 12 ==
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
I'm not sure for example, if 11GER is needed for number registry personnel
costs, that could give you 100 hostmasters with 5500EUR/month salary, in
good
likelihood, we'd be able to run focused number registry with volunteers.
I also agree that 'lots of policy' hasn't really gotten us anywhere :(
cheap shot
this is not exactly true. we just don't like where it has gotten us :)
randy
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
I also agree that 'lots of policy' hasn't really gotten us anywhere :(
cheap shot
this is not exactly true. we just don't like where it has gotten us :)
that's a fair cheap shot.
I also agree that 'lots of policy' hasn't really gotten us anywhere :(
cheap shot
this is not exactly true. we just don't like where it has gotten us :)
that's a fair cheap shot.
https://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-103
randy
23 matches
Mail list logo
