On 2015-05-09 11:57, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
The standard 48 port with 2 port uplink 1U switch is far from full
depth.
You put them in the back of the rack and have the small computers in
the
front. You might even turn the switches around, so the ports face
inwards
into the rack. The network
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
On May 9, 2015 at 00:24 char...@thefnf.org (char...@thefnf.org) wrote:
So I just crunched the numbers. How many pies could I cram in a rack?
For another list I just estimated how many M.2 SSD modules one could
On Saturday, 9 May, 2015, at 10:59 John Levine jo...@iecc.com said:
No test/plain? Delete without further ado.
Sadly, it is no longer 1998.
No kidding. Web-Page e-mail. Lots of proprietary executable-embedded-in-data
file formats used for e-mail, and worst, gratuitous JavaScript
Juniper OCX1100 have 72 ports in 1U.
And you can tune Linux IPv4 neighbor:
https://ams-ix.net/technical/specifications-descriptions/config-guide#11
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em sábado, 9 de maio de 2015, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu escreveu:
On 05/08/2015 02:53 PM, John Levine wrote:
...
Most
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Chaim Rieger chaim.rie...@gmail.com wrote:
Best example I’ve found is located at http://jonsblog.lewis.org/
http://jonsblog.lewis.org/
I too ran out of space, Brocade, not Cisco though, and am looking to filter
prefixes. did anybody do a more recent or
You do not mention low cost before ;)
Em sábado, 9 de maio de 2015, John Levine jo...@iecc.com escreveu:
In article
cahf3uwypqn1ns_umjz-znuk3i5ufczbu9l39b-crovg6yum...@mail.gmail.com
javascript:; you write:
Juniper OCX1100 have 72 ports in 1U.
Yeah, too bad it costs $32,000. Other than
To the OP please do tell us more about what you are doing, it sounds
very interesting.
There's a conference paper in preparation. I'll send a pointer when I can.
R's,
John
On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 17:06 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
The effective limit on subnet size would be of course broadcast
overhead; 1,000 nodes on a /22 would likely be painfully slow due to
broadcast overhead alone.
Would be interesting to see how IPv6 performed, since is one of the
things it
In article cahf3uwypqn1ns_umjz-znuk3i5ufczbu9l39b-crovg6yum...@mail.gmail.com
you write:
Juniper OCX1100 have 72 ports in 1U.
Yeah, too bad it costs $32,000. Other than that it'd be perfect.
R's,
John
On 5/9/2015 18:10, Keith Medcalf wrote:
...making the Web unusable unless you disable all security (or just
refuse to deal with the schmucks that do that).
The only reasonable path for people who do not want to be invaded.
It really is easier in the long run--and I find that it is the only
On 05/08/2015 02:53 PM, John Levine wrote:
...
Most of the traffic will be from one node to another, with
considerably less to the outside. Physical distance shouldn't be a
problem since everything's in the same room, maybe the same rack.
What's the rule of thumb for number of hosts per
On 09/05/2015 23:33, Karl Auer wrote:
IPv4 ARP, for example, hits every on-subnet neighbour; the IPv6
equivalent uses multicast to hit only those neighbours that happen to
share the same 24 low-end L3 address bits as the desired target - a
statistically much smaller subset of on-link neighbours,
Some people I know (yes really) are building a system that will have
several thousand little computers in some racks. Each of the
computers runs Linux and has a gigabit ethernet interface. It occurs
to me that it is unlikely that I can buy an ethernet switch with
thousands of ports, and
-- Forwarded message --
From: BSDCon Brasil 2015 bsd...@bsdcon.com.br
Date: 2015-05-08 12:52 GMT-03:00
Subject: BSDCon Brazil 2015 - Call for Papers
To:
INTRODUCTION
BSDCon Brazil (http://www.bsdcon.com.br) is the brazilian BSD powered
and flavored conference.
The first
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote:
Not sure if you missed it.. there was a discussion on this topic in the
recent past...
I am taking the liberty of re-posting below.. you may find it useful.
You can find the complete thread here:
The standard 48 port with 2 port uplink 1U switch is far from full depth.
You put them in the back of the rack and have the small computers in the
front. You might even turn the switches around, so the ports face inwards
into the rack. The network cables would be very short and go directly from
No test/plain? Delete without further ado.
Sadly, it is no longer 1998.
R's,
John
On 05/09/2015 08:17 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
No test/plain? Delete without further ado.
In the past year or so it seems that all RAA Verification emails, or
at least the ones I see, contain no plain text. :-(
-Jim
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
No test/plain? Delete without further ado.
In the past year or so it seems that all RAA Verification emails, or
at least the ones I see, contain no plain text. :-(
-Jim P.
From the work that I've done in the past with clusters, your need for
bandwidth is usually not the biggest issue. When you work with big data,
let's say 500 million data points, most mathematicians would condense it
all down into averages, standard deviations, probabilities, etc, which then
become
Ah. Security hole as designed. inline dispositions should be ignored unless
the recipient specifically requests to see them after viewing the text/plain
part. In fact, I would vote for ignoring *everything* except the text/plain
part unless the recipient specifically requests it after
On May 9, 2015 at 00:24 char...@thefnf.org (char...@thefnf.org) wrote:
So I just crunched the numbers. How many pies could I cram in a rack?
For another list I just estimated how many M.2 SSD modules one could
cram into a 3.5 disk case. Around 40 w/ some room to spare (assuming
heat and
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
On May 9, 2015 at 00:24 char...@thefnf.org (char...@thefnf.org) wrote:
So I just crunched the numbers. How many pies could I cram in a rack?
For another list I just estimated how many M.2 SSD modules one could
23 matches
Mail list logo
