Good Morning All,
I am not sure if this is the right place to ask this question or not, so here
it goes.
I am looking for someone that has experience programming a ZTE GPON OLT and
setting up some ONU profiles to go with it. I have just about everything
figured out except some issues with
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote:
I'd like to update some material on nanog.cluepon.net (not very responsive
to HTTP requests right now) and my account doesn't work anymore. I reached
out to Richard S. but have not heard back from him - anyone else here who
Does anyone beside Cisco do MAP? Brocade, Juniper, Huawei?
Thank you,
- Nich Warren
-Original Message-
From: Tore Anderson [mailto:t...@fud.no]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:15 AM
To: Baldur Norddahl
Cc: Nicholas Warren; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Greenfield 464XLAT (In January)
*
On Jun 15, 2015, at 11:54 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
I think you've offered some really bad advice here Bill.
As I said, there are lots of people who _think_ it doesn’t work. And then
there are people who’ve actually done it, and know better.
Besides, you seem to not have read
If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
assignment situation and the /24 announcement barrier. In an
IPv4-depleted world, he won't be doing anycast any time soon…
…which is one of the reasons why I
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net wrote:
On Jun 15, 2015, at 11:54 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
I think you've offered some really bad advice here Bill.
As I said, there are lots of people who _think_ it doesn’t work. And then
there are people who’ve
Uh huh. The numbers are clear: 99.99% of the time it works. The other
0.01% of the time you're screwed and had better pray the user is one
of the ones you can afford to lose.
Unicast TCP breaks too, but it has the virtue of being fixable 100% of the
time.
I love the wry humor on the nanog list.
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 16, 2015, at 12:49 , Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
wrote:
William Herrin wrote:
If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
assignment
William Herrin wrote:
If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
assignment situation and the /24 announcement barrier. In an
IPv4-depleted world, he won't be doing anycast any time soon, even if
it
Anyone on here from Unified Layer? Having an issue with a small ISP I help
out occasionally. Some of their IP Space can reach a hosted web server, but
their other prefixes cannot reach the destination. Traceroute from working
IP space to destination web server (a bank) :
15
We are very excited to be holding the next NOTR event in the great city of
Herndon, VA next Tuesday, and we invite you to join us!
Are you interested in Internet networking/peering? Do you work at a colocation,
hosting or data center facility? Are you a provider of hardware/software
solutions
On Jun 16, 2015, at 12:49 , Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
wrote:
William Herrin wrote:
If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
assignment situation and the /24 announcement
Any luck on a DNS based solution?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
I have a mail system where there are two MX hosts, one in the US and one in
Europe. Both have a DNS MX record metric of 10 so a bastardized
round-robin takes place. This does not work so
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:07:22PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
What about IPv6? We have a plan! We plan to be dead before customers
demand IPv6.
I am pretty sure the authors are still alive(?).
and customer demand for ipv6
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote:
Any luck on a DNS based solution?
I'm looking into a F5 GTM solution based out of a colo we have in Europe to
direct SMTP between France and the US hubs. Now I just have to work layers
8 9.
Remember when users didn't
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
It seems to be more of a last-mile backhoe fade issue right now. I'm
trying to convince them that a manufacturing facility isn't a good place
for a data center.
Backhoes seem to have gotten you for a day or so now. My mail
In message 82d10008-cb76-42c7-a78c-ee876924d...@pch.net, Bill Woodcock writes:
If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
assignment situation and the /24 announcement barrier. In an
IPv4-depleted
On Jun 15, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
I have a mail system where there are two MX hosts, one in the US and one in
Europe. Both have a DNS MX record metric of 10 so a bastardized
round-robin takes place. This does not work so well when one site goes
down. My
18 matches
Mail list logo
