Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

> On Dec 6, 2015, at 2:56 AM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> Where the definition of Full Table is everything that isn’t exclusively >> behind Cogent. > > I thought that was a full table in IPv4 as well? The

Modem as a service?

We are looking to automate testing of OOB modem connections when our NMS detects a site connection failure. Rather than have a live body call a modem number (or even a fax) to see if it answers (to determine if there is a potential site power issue), we'd like to be able to utilize some "Modem

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: >> On Dec 6, 2015, at 2:56 AM, William Herrin wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >>> Where the definition of Full Table is everything that isn’t exclusively >>>

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On 12/5/15 9:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> On Dec 4, 2015, at 17:43 , Randy Bush wrote: >> >>> Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the >>> global v6 internet >> >> if A does not peer with B, >> then for all A and B >> they are evil partitioners? >>

Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions

On 6 December 2015 at 06:18, Mark Andrews wrote: > > Are you really suggesting that a residential ISP accept routes advertised > > from their customer’s CPE? Really? > > PD is used internally as well as externally, and with a little bit > of crypto to prove the assigned address

Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions

> On Dec 6, 2015, at 15:03 , Brett Frankenberger wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:20:36PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >> As an alternative worth considering, it could do this with BGP instead of >> OSPF. >> >> There’s nothing mythical or magical about BGP. A CPE

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Max Tulyev wrote: > On 04.12.15 01:19, Baldur Norddahl wrote: >> On 1 December 2015 at 20:23, Max Tulyev wrote: >>> I have to change at least one of my uplinks because of it, which one is >>> better to drop, HE or Cogent?

Re: Modem as a service?

What about a $20 android phone, when it detects a power loss (stops charging), send an sms. On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:03:48PM +1100, Karl Auer wrote: > On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 18:13 -0600, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > You could always just use UPS equipment that can send out alerts on power > >

Re: Modem as a service?

Have you looked into scheduled scans with WarVOX? On Dec 6, 2015 7:39 PM, "James Laszko" wrote: We are looking to automate testing of OOB modem connections when our NMS detects a site connection failure. Rather than have a live body call a modem number (or even a fax) to

Re: Modem as a service?

On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 16:36 -0500, James R Cutler wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2015, at 2:19 PM, James Laszko wrote: > > > > ... we don’t need to actually connect to the OOB modem on the other side, > > we just need a NO ANSWER/ANSWER kind of response. … > > Forget modems - to

RE: Modem as a service?

Nah, it wasn't you! :) The solution I think we're going to go with is leveraging our existing SIP infrastructure and write scripts to dial out to the OOB Modem / Fax machines at the sites that are disconnected from the network. If they both don’t answer, we'll assume a power outage. If one

RE: Modem as a service?

You could always just use UPS equipment that can send out alerts on power outages and low bat voltage. Or, use equipment that supports dying gasp. On Dec 6, 2015 4:31 PM, "James Laszko" wrote: > Nah, it wasn't you! :) > > The solution I think we're going to go with is

Re: Modem as a service?

Apologies, Should have listed the following link as this is suited for the US market whereas the other is European. http://www.tekview-solutions.com/powertxtduo.php Regards, Hal Ponton Senior Network Engineer Buzcom / FibreWiFi Tel: 07429 979 217 Email: h...@buzcom.net > On 7 Dec 2015, at

Re: Modem as a service?

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Karl Auer wrote: > > There might be a product idea here, if no-one's done it already: > Something like a RaspBerry Pi, running off a lithium battery, with a > recharge circuit and something to detect a power outage. Add a 3G/4G > card to send

Re: Modem as a service?

On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 18:13 -0600, Josh Reynolds wrote: > You could always just use UPS equipment that can send out alerts on power > outages and low bat voltage. Or, use equipment that supports dying gasp. The equipment you have needs to be able to send the alert, which means SMS or

Re: Modem as a service?

There are already devices that are doing this like PowerTxT, it may be based off another company I may add but we are using them for OOB monitoring of power for remote sites. They have just enough power in the capacitors to send a text message to a master number or gateway for an NMS. Have a

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On 04.12.15 01:19, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > On 1 December 2015 at 20:23, Max Tulyev wrote: >> I have to change at least one of my uplinks because of it, which one is >> better to drop, HE or Cogent? >> > > Question: Why would you have to drop one of them? You have no problem

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On 7 December 2015 at 01:54, Matthew Petach wrote: > So, hypothetically speaking, if Level3 and NTT > both charge $2/mb/s/month, and Cogent and > HE charge $0.75/mb/s/month, you might > find that you get a more cost-effective > blend by getting 3 circuits, one each > from

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

I think what’s stopping this from being a bigger issue is that neither network has many (if any) single-homed customers that don’t connect on IPv4, which as mentioned previously isn’t partitioned. If there were many IPv6 only eyeballs single-homed behind each network then it would be a bigger

Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions

On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:20:36PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote: > > As an alternative worth considering, it could do this with BGP instead of > OSPF. > > There’s nothing mythical or magical about BGP. A CPE autoconfiguring > itself to advertise the prefix(es) it has received from upstream > DHCPv6

Re: Modem as a service?

On 12/6/15 10:37 AM, James Laszko wrote: > We are looking to automate testing of OOB modem connections when our > NMS detects a site connection failure. Rather than have a live body > call a modem number (or even a fax) to see if it answers (to > determine if there is a potential site power

Re: Modem as a service?

> On Dec 6, 2015, at 2:19 PM, James Laszko wrote: > > ... we don’t need to actually connect to the OOB modem on the other side, we > just need a NO ANSWER/ANSWER kind of response. … Forget modems - to probe via some kind of analog connection, just get a single

Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions

> On Dec 6, 2015, at 08:45 , Baldur Norddahl wrote: > > On 6 December 2015 at 06:18, Mark Andrews wrote: > >>> Are you really suggesting that a residential ISP accept routes advertised >>> from their customer’s CPE? Really? >> >> PD is used

RE: Modem as a service?

It looks like WarVOX has been rolled into Metasploit…. I guess using SIP trunking could accomplish the same thing – we don’t need to actually connect to the OOB modem on the other side, we just need a NO ANSWER/ANSWER kind of response. I will investigate SIP software to accomplish this,

Questions regarding equipment for a large LAN event

Hi Nanog, This email might seem a bit strange but bear with me. I am a member of a student club in Montreal named "Lan ETS". Every year, we organize on the biggest LAN event in North-America. We have an amazing partnership with Cisco where they allow us to request a fair amount of equipment

Re: Questions regarding equipment for a large LAN event

On 7 Dec 2015, at 13:41, Laurent Dumont wrote: > I appreciate any input on the matter! 1. cisco-nsp is a better list for this type of question. 2. The ASR9K is an edge router, not an access switch. 3. Why not just ask Cisco, for starters? --- Roland

Re: Questions regarding equipment for a large LAN event

On 7/Dec/15 08:41, Laurent Dumont wrote: > > > We were looking at either the Nexus 7004 chassis or the ASR 9004/9006 > chassis for this year event. We would then use 48xGigE and 1x24 SFP+ > line cards. Our actual port requirements and somewhat flexible but we > do need at least 4x10G Fiber

Re: Google Chrome 47.0.2526.73M broken NTLM proxy authentication

A quick update, Google Chrome engineering did cut a new release with a fix for this but it's not available yet. https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=544255 The current workaround is to shrink your return headers smaller then 4096 bytes to prevent the authentication popup. Get