So we went round and round back in November regarding Binge On! and whether
it was net neutrality. So here's some closure to that...
The EFF did some testing and discovered that what T-Mobile is actually doing
doesn't match what they said it was...
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/01/eff-confir
On Thursday, January 7, 2016, Daniel Corbe wrote:
> Anyone out there aware of any DOCSIS 3.0 cable modems that have a working
> CLAT implementation?
>
>
Not modems, but home gateway routers
NEC has a product http://www.necat.co.jp/en/ipv6/index.html
And it is supported in openwrt
Anyone out there aware of any DOCSIS 3.0 cable modems that have a working CLAT
implementation?
On 12/19/2015 07:17 AM, Sander Steffann wrote:
Hi Jeff,
It's far past time to worry about architectural purity. We need people
deploying IPv6 *NOW*, and it needs to be the job of the IETF, at this
point, to fix the problems that are causing people not to deploy.
I partially agree with you. I
On 12/18/2015 01:20 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
On 12/17/15, 1:59 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Matthew Petach"
I'm still waiting for the IETF to come around
to allowing feature parity between IPv4 and IPv6
when it comes to DHCP. The stance of not
allowing the DHCP server to assign a default
gateway to
At this point if you haven't deployed any of these system, make sure you know
the road map of your vendor for N-GPON2 that is going to be the next wave of
deployed pon systems.
https://www.calix.com/solutions/next-generation-pon.html
Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
1
Based on a cursory pass of the FB website I can't find any of their
products that have a CDMA modem - so they're definitely incorrect in that
sense. Voice, text, 2G and 3G data are all CDMA on Verizon, unless you're
doing something with SMS over IMS which is only supported with LTE capable
hardware
I emailed smsfoxbox support asking about US network support. I am
hoping to hear back soon and I will let you all know the answer.
Thanks,
Scott
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:40 PM, David Hubbard
wrote:
> Scott, I was interested in that as well, it was in my original post. I’m
> considering that an
Scott, I was interested in that as well, it was in my original post. I’m
considering that and the SMSEagle; both are from Europe. I can’t find too much
on them from a real world war stories perspective, but there has been mention
of the FoxBox on nanog in years past, so there are some users ou
Yep, agreed in certain situations a hardware gateway is more useful.
That is what I listed as item #1. A small Mikrotik Router + USB Cell Stick of
your choice.
make for a very inexpensive, flexible gateway.
http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/CO10/day1/03-arnis_3g.pdf
(quiet a few options
I am well aware of email-to-sms, but that is dependant on
links/infrastructure that you are monitoring. (Think of it like having your
Nagios system running on the same hypervisor as your other production gear.
What happens if the hypervisor drops? How would you know?)
The hardware sms gateway allo
There are multiple ways to skin this cat !.
No, not familiar with this product...
However..
1) You know that you can send sms messages via email to pretty much any cell
phone.
2) Personal Preference, if I was doing so, I would do it with a small mikrotik
router + usb cell modem, very inexpen
Does anyone having experience getting this to work on US networks?
http://www.smsfoxbox.it/en/foxbox-lx800-gateway-100.html/
I am interested on getting this working with our Nagios notifications.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:40 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>Thanks for those pointers. The "mega bill" pro
Hi Hugo,
Thanks for the follow-up. For some reason both responses from Mr. Lewis
ended up my Gmail (domain) Spam folder. I have never had a NANOG response
go into Spam, so I didn't even think to check there.
I'll give this a shot today. Thanks again!
-David
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Hugo
Doh! Not sure why I didn’t think about Atlas prior to posting my question -
that’s perfect.
I have an Atlas node on my network too. After I put it in and played with it
for a week I started a big project at work and put it on the “to play with
later” list and never got back to it. :)
Thank
The NLNOG RING servers would be good targets and they expected to get
pinged.
https://ring.nlnog.net/participants/
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 08:34 AM, Brian R. Swan wrote:
> I’m setting up smokeping to try and gather some latency statistics on my
> ISP to different parts of the world. Does there
Hello Brian,
you might want to consider joining the nlnog ring (https://ring.nlnog.net/).
You can request access to a full mesh smokeping for all hosts too.
Besides the ring host RIPE Atlas anchors (
https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/) might be another option for hosts to
add to your list.
Am 0
Very cool - thanks for sharing that.
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Andrew Dampf wrote:
>
> Something I found that is helpful once you've gathered a list of targets is
> the following command for generating config to paste:
Something I found that is helpful once you've gathered a list of targets is
the following command for generating config to paste:
traceroute -w 3 [IPaddress] | grep -v "*" | grep -v "traceroute" | sed -e
's/(//g' -e 's/)//g' | awk '{ gsub(/\./,"_",$2); print " "$2"\nmenu =
"$3"\ntitle = "$2" -
19 matches
Mail list logo