Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it

> On Jan 27, 2016, at 14:43 , Måns Nilsson wrote: > > Subject: Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane > Electric - and how to solve it Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:28:01PM + > Quoting Brandon Butterworth (bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk): > >>

Re: Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

Hi, > Fortunately the two groups came together in the IEEE, and there are no > competing standards. right! so why do both keep updating their own marketing and web pages each month? ;-) thanks for the info though - our future world isnt messed up for multigig > - Optional Energy Efficient

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

Having them visit the excellent test-IPv6.com is the best and easiest way to get that info. Jared Mauch > On Jan 27, 2016, at 4:41 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Are you talking about the same people that respond with "What is an IP?" > > > Josh Luthman > Office:

Re: Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

Will we also get 2.5 Gbps fiber optics? SFP modules should support it? Regards Baldur Den 27. jan. 2016 23.00 skrev "Greg Hankins" : > Fortunately the two groups came together in the IEEE, and there are no > competing standards. > > IEEE P802.3bz 2.5/5GBASE-T Task Force

Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it

Subject: Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:28:01PM + Quoting Brandon Butterworth (bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk): > tier 1 seems consistent with Cogents refusal. one does not become a tier 1 by refusing to

Re: small automatic transfer switches

If you’re willing to risk that solution, and want monitoring, a $10 Microcontroller and ~$1.00 worth of ancillary resistors and diodes will get you monitoring. If you want to get really fancy, you could mount it all to a custom designed PCB for around $10 ($5/sq.in. for 3 copies of the PCB) from

GitHub outage - idle speculation thread

Github has been down for about two hours now. No good public information that I can find so far, except that they mention a "network disruption" in early status updates. However, nothing interesting is showing up in BGPlay (like a shift over to Prolexic due to a DDoS). Their colocation provider is

Re: GitHub outage - idle speculation thread

I haven't had any issues w/ push and pull via SSH so far during the outage. Appears to be only HTTP based interactions. -Grant On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Alex Forster wrote: > Github has been down for about two hours now. No good public information > that I can

Re: GitHub outage - idle speculation thread

It seems to be back now. I can get back to checking out the new version of IXP Manager. :-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Grant Ridder" To: "Alex Forster"

IX ARP Timeout

So I'm looking at the policies, recommended configurations, etc. of other IXes. We try to model a lot of ourselves on what the Europeans do (even if we come up short in some areas). I was reading through the AMS-IX guide.

Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it

On 28/Jan/16 03:36, Owen DeLong wrote: > I disagree with this last part. > > I realize that the common wisdom among execs at so-called tier-1 providers > is that refusing SFI protects their revenue stream, but I believe it’s not > true. > > In fact, I think that a willingness to peer with your

Re: IX ARP Timeout

> So I'm looking at the policies, recommended configurations, etc. of other > IXes. We try to model a lot of ourselves on what the Europeans do (even if we > come up short in some areas). I was reading through the AMS-IX guide. > >

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

> On Jan 27, 2016, at 07:12 , Jared Mauch wrote: > > >> On Jan 26, 2016, at 7:33 PM, Andrey Yakovlev wrote: >> >> One user had his wife sharing his Netflix account on her iPad while on a >> conference to Europe (same account, different countries). >

Re: small automatic transfer switches

better yet, $134 http://www.amazon.com/CyberPower-PDU20MHVT10AT-Metered-Power-Distribution/dp/B00NEHXESQ/ref=sr_1_17?s=electronics=UTF8=1453926782=1-17=cyberpower+ats On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Does anyone have any recommendations for a small, cheap,

Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

I've a couple 10 port Cisco switches that support 2.5 and 5gbps over cat5e, just wondering if there are any other vendors out there with offerings that support these newer ethernet speeds. Supporting cat5e for these multi-gig speeds is a real boon in many circumstances given the wide popularity

small automatic transfer switches

Does anyone have any recommendations for a small, cheap, reliable ATS? (I know, pick two, you can't have all three) I'm looking for something to power one or two 120V out-of-band network device(s) in each location with a single power supply each, much less than 10 amps total, with two 120v input

Re: small automatic transfer switches

http://www.amazon.com/CyberPower-PDU15M10AT-Metered-Power-Distribution/dp/B00NEHUX08 $205 On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Does anyone have any recommendations for a small, cheap, reliable ATS? > (I know, pick two, you can't have all three) I'm looking for

RE: Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

It is really early days for this spec. I know there are a few SKUs are Cisco 3850 that have multi-gig support, but I don't know of anything else yet. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Justin Krejci Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:49 PM To:

Re: Arista optics

If you are going to be using Flexoptics copper SFPs, be aware that if you are on the latest code revision 4.15.x that you may have to manually reseat the flexoptics SFPs for them to work. I have run into this issue recently in our lab. I can confirm that if you use 4.14.x that you will not have to

Re: small automatic transfer switches

Doesnt the packetflux sitemonitor generator controller do that? > On Jan 27, 2016, at 12:33, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > better yet, $134 >

Re: small automatic transfer switches

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > better yet, $134 > http://www.amazon.com/CyberPower-PDU20MHVT10AT-Metered-Power-Distribution/dp/B00NEHXESQ/ref=sr_1_17?s=electronics=UTF8=1453926782=1-17=cyberpower+ats That unit is 220V. I bought it once by

Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:11:59AM -0500, jimmy keffer wrote: > does ntt peer with he for ip6? You can review sites like: https://radar.qrator.net/as2914/ipv6-peerings#startDate=2015-10-10=2016-01-27=current or http://bgp.he.net/AS2914#_peers6 to get a sense of what relations

Re: AW: AW: AW: Peering Exchange

Hi Jürgen, Well, I did say "nearly" every major IP transit provider.. :-) If BGP action communities are important to your network and your existing upstream(s) don't support them, then maybe it is time to start looking for a different transit provider. Best regards, Martijn On 01/27/2016 03:31

Re: small automatic transfer switches

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Does anyone have any recommendations for a small, cheap, reliable ATS? The APC SU042 series sell for dirt on ebay. -Bill -- William Herrin her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us Owner, Dirtside Systems

Re: Arista optics

*edit* be aware that if you are on the latest code revision 4.15.x that you may have to manually reseat the flexoptics SFPs for them to work --- this is after you reboot/reload the switch. On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, J Crowe wrote: > If you are going to be using

Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it

does ntt peer with he for ip6?

RE: small automatic transfer switches

I have had good luck with BayTech in the past. http://www.baytech.net/ Tom Krenn | Optum IT Network Services -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Anderson Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:30 PM To:

RE: small automatic transfer switches

+1 on Baytech -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Krenn, Thomas A Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:36 PM To: Chuck Anderson; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: small automatic transfer switches I have had good luck with BayTech in the past.

Re: small automatic transfer switches

If you are not looking for "monitoring" of it. A DPDT 120v 10amp Relay with three power cords cut and attached will make an ATS for under $30. Velocity Online 850-205-4638 On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:16 PM, William Herrin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Chuck Anderson

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

Our (Netflix) call center has been trained on how to handle calls for false positive issues with proxy/VPNs. If you don't achieve an acceptable result, please feel free to reach out - but believe it or not, they are the best ones to handle. -Dave On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:36 AM, chris

Re: small automatic transfer switches

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:16 PM, William Herrin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> Does anyone have any recommendations for a small, cheap, reliable ATS? > > The APC SU042 series sell for dirt on ebay. Or the SU041 if you have some

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

Are you talking about the same people that respond with "What is an IP?" Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Dave Temkin wrote: > Our (Netflix) call center has been trained on how to

Re: Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

Hi, > I've a couple 10 port Cisco switches that support 2.5 and 5gbps over cat5e, > just wondering if there are any other vendors out there with offerings that > support these newer ethernet speeds. Supporting cat5e for these multi-gig > speeds is a real boon in many circumstances given the

Re: Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

Fortunately the two groups came together in the IEEE, and there are no competing standards. IEEE P802.3bz 2.5/5GBASE-T Task Force stared in March 2015: - 2.5GBASE-T: 4 x 625 Mb/s over 100 m Cat 5e (Class D) or Cat 6 (Class E) unshielded twisted-pair copper cabling - 5GBASE-T: 4 x 1.250 Gb/s over

Re: AW: Peering Exchange

Some companies present at some IX with no MLPE simply don't like to be listed at all, and they prefer to be filtered out from LG servers. It's simply their police and some big companies do not have a policy which is the same for everyone peering, say, content provider X will peer with you if

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

26.01.2016, 17:49, "Ryan Gard" : > Hey, > > Per chance if someone @ Netflix could reach me off list? Seems that as of > this weekend there's a number of our clients (residential internet) who are > unable to utilize Netflix directly, instead being presented with a message >

AW: AW: AW: Peering Exchange

Hi Dovid, Yes, vitamin B often helps. But it doesn't matter - if the transit provider doesn't support it on an official way you do net get an SLA for the communities. They could stop working from one day to another ... Jürgen Jaritsch Head of Network & Infrastructure ANEXIA

AW: AW: Peering Exchange

Hi Martjin, > I think nearly every major IP transit provider has built out a BGP action > community system to allow their customers to control prefix announcements in That’s also what I thought but the truth is: there are MANY major transit providers who simply doesn't support any community

Re: AW: AW: Peering Exchange

HE will if you know who to speak to... Regards, Dovid -Original Message- From: Jürgen Jaritsch Sender: "NANOG" Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:20:31 To: i3D net - Martijn Schmidt; Andrey Yakovlev; Bernd

Re: AW: Peering Exchange

Peering with someone via an IX shouldn't be consuming any additional ports. Emotional rather than technical concerns are typically why someone won't peer. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Andrey Yakovlev"

Re: AW: Peering Exchange

"We also had problems where transit customers said don't want to be exported to a certain IX point of presence while he wanted to be exported at a different location." That's a fairly normal request. I think nearly every major IP transit provider has built out a BGP action community system to

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

> On Jan 26, 2016, at 7:33 PM, Andrey Yakovlev wrote: > > One user had his wife sharing his Netflix account on her iPad while on a > conference to Europe (same account, different countries). Hmm, I seem to think this one might be quite common, so perhaps should be tied