Re: Patch panel solutions for 4x10GE breakout

It's the Corning Edge8 line [ https://www.corning.com/worldwide/en/products/communication-networks/applications/data-center/edge8.html ] On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: > There is a nice Corning panel our facilities team is using now. I can find > the

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

We use Calix gigacenter 844E. It will do everything you listed (and a whole lot more) except the VPN part. -Sean On Thursday, May 5, 2016, Ken Chase wrote: > Looking around at different SMB firewalls to standardize on so we can start > training up our level 2/3 techs instead

Re: Patch panel solutions for 4x10GE breakout

We generally run a MTP/MPO12 cable to a breakout cassette a few racks down, and that's where we split out all of the LC pairs. It keeps the mess away from the routers/traffic generators. *Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net *Arbor Networks* +1.734.794.5033 (d) |

Re: ATT Mobile Outage San Juan, PR 8+ hours, 1 Million out.

It looks like www.outages.org stopped being updated with outage data in January 2013? Nathan On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > > > On May 4, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Javier J wrote: > > > > If there is a better mailing list please let

RE: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

I'm a huge fan of Juniper's SRX line. I use all the features you point out at home on my SRX210, although that product is end-of-life. A refurbished SRX220 lists on Amazon for about $375, and a new one for $700. Naturally support is extra, but I'm not sure how much. I haven't used it myself but I

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

I install and support Cisco ASA, Dell SonicWall, Fortigate, and PaloAlto firewalls. The best SMB devices are definitely SonicWall and Fortigate. SonicWalls are easier to configure, but have fewer features. Fortigate has many knobs and dials and a very powerful virtual router facility that can

RE: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

Your exactly right, Mel. Dell has really turned the Sonicwall platform around in the past few year. We dropped it a year or two before Dell took them over. Back then Sonicwall was full of issues and lacked important features that our enterprise customers required. If you have budget, Palo Alto

RE: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

We deploy SonicWALL TZ300 or SOHO using Dell's Security as a Service. That way our monthly cost per customer is under $50 and includes all security services plus GMS centralized management. Works great with our VOIP service. Regards, Ray Orsini – CEO Orsini IT, LLC – Technology Consultants VOICE

RE: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

We have a lot of luck for smaller VOIP customers having all of their services run through a FortiGate 60D, or higher models. 60D is our go to solution for small enterprise. However, if we are the network carrier for a particular customer and they have a voip deployment of more than about 15

sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

Looking around at different SMB firewalls to standardize on so we can start training up our level 2/3 techs instead of dealing with a mess of different vendors at cust premises. I've run into a few firewalls that were not sip or 323 friendly however, wondering what your experiences are. Need

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

What PFSense currently lacks in brand name recognition, they can make up with by the fact that they offer paid support at very affordable levels. I'd go with https://store.pfsense.org/SG-2440/ ($499 each) and a quote for professional services (

Netnod RD announcing misoriginate routes

I have contacted noc@ and peering contacts for Netnod and Mainloop AS43893 24 hours ago, but no response or remediation If you have a contact, please ask tell to stop originating and announcing space 172.32.x.x space that belongs to 21928 It would also be good if they responded to me yesterday

Patch panel solutions for 4x10GE breakout

So the newer equipment we are looking at uses QSFP+/MTP with 4x10GE breakouts to deliver 10G. We are not wiring these up to things in the same rack, they will be going to patch panels and then elsewhere in a facility. It could potentially get messy with the panels we have today so we are

Re: Patch panel solutions for 4x10GE breakout

There is a nice Corning panel our facilities team is using now. I can find the link and send it to the list when not at my phone. Jared Mauch > On May 5, 2016, at 10:28 AM, Phil Bedard wrote: > > So the newer equipment we are looking at uses QSFP+/MTP with 4x10GE

Re: Netnod RD announcing misoriginate routes

On Thursday, May 5, 2016, Ca By wrote: > I have contacted noc@ and peering contacts for Netnod and Mainloop > AS43893 24 hours ago, but no response or remediation > > If you have a contact, please ask tell to stop originating and announcing > space 172.32.x.x space that

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

I should mention that both SonicWall and Fortigate have superb packet capture engines. Not only can you do capture view and first-level decode right in the web GUI, you can save captures in PCAP format or pipe the capture stream to an available Ethernet port. Both have extensive filtering for

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

Both the Juniper SRX, and the Mikrotik will work. The problem isn't firewalling, it's NAT. NAT is evil. Perhaps having enough IP Addresses would be a better solution? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v26BAlfWBm8 On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Matt Freitag wrote: > I'm a

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

I'm a fan of the EdgeRouterLite3 I don't manage many small businesses networks anymore because we now do only 100% cloud and remote work but I started deploying them to all my old clients I still have on retainer. It is a wonderful solid set it, and forget it device and you can manage it with

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

If you are considering pfSense, I would urge you to look at OPNsense instead. The pfSense code is horrible! On 5/5/16 11:11 AM, amuse wrote: What PFSense currently lacks in brand name recognition, they can make up with by the fact that they offer paid support at very affordable levels. I'd go

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

> On May 5, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Javier J wrote: > > I'm a fan of the EdgeRouterLite3 > > > I don't manage many small businesses networks anymore because we now do > only 100% cloud and remote work but I started deploying them to all my old > clients I still have on

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

The SIP ALG in the Juniper SRXs is definitely one of the best I’ve come across. I defaulted to turning it off based on my previous experiences with SIP ALGs and NAT however it became apparent that it actually worked really well and I ended up defaulting it to on. - Tim > On 6 May 2016, at

CALEA

Does anyone have some up-to-date information on CALEA? https://askcalea.fbi.gov/ has a fair amount of broken links. The servicer provider registration is broken. The web-site has not been updated. Searches on FBI.gov and the FCC site just point back to

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > > > On May 5, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Javier J wrote: > > > > I'm a fan of the EdgeRouterLite3 > > > > > > I don't manage many small businesses networks anymore because we now do > > only 100%

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

Yeah, the EdgeRouter series do not suck. Fast, stable, easy to manage (although the broken tab completion drives me nuts ('sho ip route' should just work, I'm too old to retrain my fingers...) - other than that they are great... W On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:28 PM Jared Mauch

RE: Patch panel solutions for 4x10GE breakout

Might be worth having a look at the Corning centrix modules. Very high densities. 72 terminations per u. Front side mpo/mtp connections. Have some great slack storage and management options. From: NANOG on behalf of Phil Bedard Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016