Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior

[Gordon Cook]

 please accept my apologies this response was totally out of context

> On Jun 16, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Gordon Cook  wrote:
> 
> 
> i also see now that you are a guru rinpoche as wlell
> 
> but with valerie home any minute i must stop
> 
> will come back though
>> On Jun 16, 2017, at 7:42 PM, Stephen Fulton  wrote:
>> 
>> Alain,
>> 
>> When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit?  Or are 
>> these PNI's with Google?  Do the GCLD instance you reach through "normal 
>> peering" have higher latency than through TorIX?
>> 
>> -- Stephen
>> 
>> On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
>>>Hi,
>>>Anyone aware of different traffic behavior depending if the target goes 
>>> through normal peering than through an exchanges google exists in?
>>>We're facing a weird issue where the same GCLD Instance can upload up to 
>>> 200Mbps (Ref 1) if the target path goes through, lets say TorIX, but cannot 
>>> get more than 20Mbps on similar hosts (8 of them) sittings on our peering 
>>> links.
>>>PS; Those sames hosts get up to their link limit ( 1Gbps ) between each 
>>> others and others test points we have;
>>>PS: Wireshark capture show nothing abnormal;
>>>PS: Links aren't congested, and so on...
>>> Ref 1 - 200Mbps is on a link rate-limited to 300Mbps.  Its my only test 
>>> point with a TorIX access
>> 
> 
> 

[NANOG-announce] Mailman Maintenance

[Valerie Wittkop]

Hello NANOGers,

The mailman servers will be undergoing maintenance tonight between 8:00 and 
8:30pm Eastern.  Mail sent to lists hosted on the NANOG mailman servers will be 
held during the maintenance window.

Regular operations will resume once the maintenance is complete.

Sincerely,

NANOG Staff
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
nanog-annou...@mailman.nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

Re: Internet connectivity in Nigeria

[Rod Beck]

PCCW has a strong presence in Africa and they are easy to work with.


- R.


From: NANOG  on behalf of Sina Owolabi 

Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 8:59:41 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: Internet connectivity in Nigeria

Hi All

Currently having a terrible situation in Nigeria where the GLO1 and
MainOne cables appear to be both down.
Can anyone suggest a good Nigerian ISP with redundancies enough to
overcome at least two of the following dying out?

SAT-3
WACS
GLO1
ACE
MainOne

Please dont say MTN or any of the Nigerian telcos, except there are no
other options, customer service will leave you trying to commit bodily
harm.

Re: Internet connectivity in Nigeria

[Joel Jaeggli]

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 18, 2017, at 12:29, Sina Owolabi  wrote:
> 
> PCCW? I dont think I've heard of them

Pccw would be sat3 glo1 and wacs maybe others.

http://mediafiles.pccwglobal.com/images/downloads/Inf_map.pdf

Their looking glass can give you some idea into their reach with Nigeria with a 
little experimentation.

http://lookingglass.pccwglobal.com/

That said sat3 and glo1 combined have something like an order of magnitude less 
capacity than wacs so the survival / utility of any of the older systems when 
losing the newest ones is probably less than complete.

> 
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Rod Beck
>  wrote:
>> 
>> PCCW has a strong presence in Africa and they are easy to work with.
>> 
>> 
>> - R.
>> 
>> 
>> From: NANOG  on behalf of Sina Owolabi
>> 
>> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 8:59:41 PM
>> To: nanog@nanog.org list
>> Subject: Internet connectivity in Nigeria
>> 
>> Hi All
>> 
>> Currently having a terrible situation in Nigeria where the GLO1 and
>> MainOne cables appear to be both down.
>> Can anyone suggest a good Nigerian ISP with redundancies enough to
>> overcome at least two of the following dying out?
>> 
>> SAT-3
>> WACS
>> GLO1
>> ACE
>> MainOne
>> 
>> Please dont say MTN or any of the Nigerian telcos, except there are no
>> other options, customer service will leave you trying to commit bodily
>> harm.
> 

Internet connectivity in Nigeria

[Sina Owolabi]

Hi All

Currently having a terrible situation in Nigeria where the GLO1 and
MainOne cables appear to be both down.
Can anyone suggest a good Nigerian ISP with redundancies enough to
overcome at least two of the following dying out?

SAT-3
WACS
GLO1
ACE
MainOne

Please dont say MTN or any of the Nigerian telcos, except there are no
other options, customer service will leave you trying to commit bodily
harm.

Re: Internet connectivity in Nigeria

[Sina Owolabi]

Yes I just tried a very comforting traceroute

traceroute ip 63.223.7.7
Sun Jun 18 20:52:28.946 GMT
Tracing the route to 63.223.7.7
1 TenGE13-3.br03.chc01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.4.253) [MPLS: Label 24967
Exp 0] 182 msec
TenGE12-2.br03.chc01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.4.249) 182 msec
TenGE13-3.br03.chc01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.4.253) 182 msec
2 TenGE13-3.br03.chc01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.4.253) [MPLS: Label 24967
Exp 0] 181 msec
TenGE12-2.br03.chc01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.4.249) 182 msec 181 msec
3 TenGE15-0.cr04.chc01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.4.193) [MPLS: Label 5035
Exp 0] 181 msec 181 msec 181 msec
4 pos2-0.cr04.nyc02.pccwbtn.net (63.218.4.38) [MPLS: Label 20449 Exp
0] 181 msec 181 msec 180 msec
5 pos4-0.cr04.ldn01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.12.85) [MPLS: Label 24363 Exp
0] 181 msec 181 msec 181 msec
6 ge0-1.204.var01.los01.pccwbtn.net (63.223.7.41) 181 msec * 180 msec
read timed-out
Query Complete

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Joel Jaeggli  wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 18, 2017, at 12:29, Sina Owolabi  wrote:
>
> PCCW? I dont think I've heard of them
>
>
> Pccw would be sat3 glo1 and wacs maybe others.
>
> http://mediafiles.pccwglobal.com/images/downloads/Inf_map.pdf
>
> Their looking glass can give you some idea into their reach with Nigeria
> with a little experimentation.
>
> http://lookingglass.pccwglobal.com/
>
> That said sat3 and glo1 combined have something like an order of magnitude
> less capacity than wacs so the survival / utility of any of the older
> systems when losing the newest ones is probably less than complete.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Rod Beck
>  wrote:
>
>
> PCCW has a strong presence in Africa and they are easy to work with.
>
>
>
> - R.
>
>
> 
>
> From: NANOG  on behalf of Sina Owolabi
>
> 
>
> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 8:59:41 PM
>
> To: nanog@nanog.org list
>
> Subject: Internet connectivity in Nigeria
>
>
> Hi All
>
>
> Currently having a terrible situation in Nigeria where the GLO1 and
>
> MainOne cables appear to be both down.
>
> Can anyone suggest a good Nigerian ISP with redundancies enough to
>
> overcome at least two of the following dying out?
>
>
> SAT-3
>
> WACS
>
> GLO1
>
> ACE
>
> MainOne
>
>
> Please dont say MTN or any of the Nigerian telcos, except there are no
>
> other options, customer service will leave you trying to commit bodily
>
> harm.
>
>

Re: Internet connectivity in Nigeria

[Sina Owolabi]

PCCW? I dont think I've heard of them

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Rod Beck
 wrote:
>
> PCCW has a strong presence in Africa and they are easy to work with.
>
>
> - R.
>
> 
> From: NANOG  on behalf of Sina Owolabi
> 
> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 8:59:41 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org list
> Subject: Internet connectivity in Nigeria
>
> Hi All
>
> Currently having a terrible situation in Nigeria where the GLO1 and
> MainOne cables appear to be both down.
> Can anyone suggest a good Nigerian ISP with redundancies enough to
> overcome at least two of the following dying out?
>
> SAT-3
> WACS
> GLO1
> ACE
> MainOne
>
> Please dont say MTN or any of the Nigerian telcos, except there are no
> other options, customer service will leave you trying to commit bodily
> harm.

Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?

[Radu-Adrian Feurdean]

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 14:51, Bajpai, Vaibhav wrote:
 
> The v6 numbers from ^ NANOG post are now more than 1 year old. Thought 
> to re-bump this thread. Would it be possible to share updated numbers 
> of v6 traffic share within your network and % contribution by top apps.

Hello,

A little late and "out-of-geography", but still... On small-ish French
ISP we have :
 - on the residential-only FTTH part, where all clients have IPv6 by
 default (unless they do something to avoid using it - and some do) : up
 to 30% of total is IPv6, and at least 60% of IPv6 is with Google.
 - globally (residential+business), the rate drops to 9% with peaks
 towards 20% on week-ends and public holidays. Same thing with Google
 doing most of IPv6.

For the record, apart Google, there are less than 10 ASes that have more
than 1% (but less than 10%) of the total IPv6 traffic. Everybody else is
just traces

Also for the record, business customers are much more active in
*rejecting* IPv6, either explictely (they say they want it disabled) or
implicitly (they install their own router, not configured for IPv6). The
bigger the business, the bigger the chance of rejection.

--
R-A.F.