Re: ARIN IRR whois broken?

[Bryan Holloway]

Nevermind ... I think I was puzzled by the fact that ARIN doesn't have 
an entry for its own IP space.


Time for beer.


On 8/17/18 6:33 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote:

 > whois -h rr.arin.net 2001:500::
% This is the ARIN Routing Registry.

%ERROR:101: no entries found
%
% No entries found in the selected source(s).

--

 > whois -h rr.ntt.net 2001:500::
route6: 2001:500::/48
descr:  Proxy RO for Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
origin: AS3557
remarks:    contacts per RFC2142:
remarks:    Abuse / UCE reports ab...@verio.net
remarks:    Security issues secur...@verio.net
mnt-by: MAINT-NTTCOM-RA
changed:    boudr...@eng.verio.net 20070413
source: NTTCOM

--

 > whois -h rr.level3.net 2001:500::

% RIPEdb(3.0.0a13) with ISI RPSL extensions

route6:    2001:500::/48
descr: Proxy RO for Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
origin:    AS3557
remarks:   contacts per RFC2142:
remarks:   Abuse / UCE reports ab...@verio.net
remarks:   Security issues secur...@verio.net
mnt-by:    MAINT-NTTCOM-RA
changed:   boudr...@eng.verio.net 20070413
source:    NTTCOM

ARIN IRR whois broken?

[Bryan Holloway]

> whois -h rr.arin.net 2001:500::
% This is the ARIN Routing Registry.

%ERROR:101: no entries found
%
% No entries found in the selected source(s).

--

> whois -h rr.ntt.net 2001:500::
route6: 2001:500::/48
descr:  Proxy RO for Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
origin: AS3557
remarks:contacts per RFC2142:
remarks:Abuse / UCE reports ab...@verio.net
remarks:Security issues secur...@verio.net
mnt-by: MAINT-NTTCOM-RA
changed:boudr...@eng.verio.net 20070413
source: NTTCOM

--

> whois -h rr.level3.net 2001:500::

% RIPEdb(3.0.0a13) with ISI RPSL extensions

route6:2001:500::/48
descr: Proxy RO for Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
origin:AS3557
remarks:   contacts per RFC2142:
remarks:   Abuse / UCE reports ab...@verio.net
remarks:   Security issues secur...@verio.net
mnt-by:MAINT-NTTCOM-RA
changed:   boudr...@eng.verio.net 20070413
source:NTTCOM

RE: Web UI DHCP Option 82

[Ryan Hamel]

Mike,

Take a look into Kea from ISC. The config is JSON based, which allows for 
nearly any scripting language to make changes, or you can dig into how it works 
with MySQL for dynamic operation 
(https://kea.isc.org/wiki/HostReservationsHowTo).

Ryan

From: NANOG  On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 1:51 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org list 
Subject: Web UI DHCP Option 82

Are there any web interfaces out there for DHCP servers that accommodate 
management of DHCP option 82 configs? Neither webmin nor Glass seem to handle 
ISC's agent.circuit-id outside of presenting the raw config file. I can do that 
just fine in nano, but I'm looking at something more user-friendly so I'm not 
the only one that can work on it.

I'm also cheap, so not looking at Infoblox or anything like that.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com

Re: Web UI DHCP Option 82

[Mel Beckman]

SimpleDNS is a Windows-based DNS server that has an extensive web API. You try 
out the HTTP API at https://simpledns.com/swagger-ui

You could build some simple PHP pages to provide whatever DHCP Options 
configuration you like.

 -mel

On Aug 17, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Mike Hammett 
mailto:na...@ics-il.net>> wrote:

Are there any web interfaces out there for DHCP servers that accommodate 
management of DHCP option 82 configs? Neither webmin nor Glass seem to handle 
ISC's agent.circuit-id outside of presenting the raw config file. I can do that 
just fine in nano, but I'm looking at something more user-friendly so I'm not 
the only one that can work on it.

I'm also cheap, so not looking at Infoblox or anything like that.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com

Web UI DHCP Option 82

[Mike Hammett]

Are there any web interfaces out there for DHCP servers that accommodate 
management of DHCP option 82 configs? Neither webmin nor Glass seem to handle 
ISC's agent.circuit-id outside of presenting the raw config file. I can do that 
just fine in nano, but I'm looking at something more user-friendly so I'm not 
the only one that can work on it. 

I'm also cheap, so not looking at Infoblox or anything like that. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

RE: Inbound Call Issues

[Luke Guillory]

Yes but I’m in South Louisiana, we’re only seeing issues with Sprint Cell 
inbound at the moment. I think someone mentioned T-Mobile but haven’t 
confirmed. We’ve reached out to ATT since the calls are coming into the tandem, 
they’ve kicked the ticket to maintenance group.

We’ve also opened a ticket up with Sprint today, don’t think anything has come 
of it yet.




Luke


ns



From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Will Duquette
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 2:31 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Inbound Call Issues

Has anyone had issues reported over the last few weeks from customers with 
inbound calls in the Northeast reporting the following:

1. Long call setup
2. No ring back or very delayed ring back (Post Dial Delay)
3. Delayed audio in calls.  Persons on each end maybe talking over each other.
4. Multiple call logs showing up for a single call in logs.

We have been engaging multiple providers (CCI, Spectrum, Windstream and Onvoy) 
and have been making some progress but are looking to see if anyone else is 
experiencing the same issues.

Thanks,

--
Will Duquette
Network Engineer II
GWI

Office:   207-602-1228
Cell:  207-590-2084
Fax:  207-282-5036
www.gwi.net

Re: Inbound Call Issues

[Ross Tajvar]

I got this from Bandwidth earlier this afternoon. Might be related:
Inbound Calling to Canada 
Incident Report for Bandwidth
New Incident Status: Identified
Bandwidth’s vendor has identified the source of impairment within their
network and are working towards a resolution.
Aug 17, 12:03 EDT
Investigating
Bandwidth is currently working with our Canadian based vendor to
investigate inbound calling to Canadian Numbers.
Aug 17, 11:22 EDT
This incident affects: Inbound Calling Services (Inbound Calling (SIP)).

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Will Duquette  wrote:

> Has anyone had issues reported over the last few weeks from customers with
> inbound calls in the Northeast reporting the following:
>
> 1. Long call setup
> 2. No ring back or very delayed ring back (Post Dial Delay)
> 3. Delayed audio in calls.  Persons on each end maybe talking over each
> other.
> 4. Multiple call logs showing up for a single call in logs.
>
> We have been engaging multiple providers (CCI, Spectrum, Windstream and
> Onvoy) and have been making some progress but are looking to see if anyone
> else is experiencing the same issues.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Will Duquette
>
> *Network Engineer II*GWI
>
> *Office:*   207-602-1228
> *Cell:*  207-590-2084
> *Fax:*  207-282-5036
> www.gwi.net
>

Inbound Call Issues

[Will Duquette]

Has anyone had issues reported over the last few weeks from customers with
inbound calls in the Northeast reporting the following:

1. Long call setup
2. No ring back or very delayed ring back (Post Dial Delay)
3. Delayed audio in calls.  Persons on each end maybe talking over each
other.
4. Multiple call logs showing up for a single call in logs.

We have been engaging multiple providers (CCI, Spectrum, Windstream and
Onvoy) and have been making some progress but are looking to see if anyone
else is experiencing the same issues.

Thanks,

-- 
Will Duquette

*Network Engineer II*GWI

*Office:*   207-602-1228
*Cell:*  207-590-2084
*Fax:*  207-282-5036
www.gwi.net

Weekly Routing Table Report

[Routing Analysis Role Account]

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.

The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.

Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net

For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 18 Aug, 2018

Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net
Detailed Analysis:  http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:  710936
Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS):  273073
Deaggregation factor:  2.60
Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets):  341471
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 61560
Prefixes per ASN: 11.55
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   53145
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   23145
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:8415
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:265
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   4.0
Max AS path length visible:  34
Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 30873)  32
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:64
Number of instances of unregistered ASNs:64
Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:  23718
Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:   19114
Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table:   80241
Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:79
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:2
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:273
Number of addresses announced to Internet:   2857353028
Equivalent to 170 /8s, 79 /16s and 191 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:   77.2
Percentage of allocated address space announced:   77.2
Percentage of available address space allocated:  100.0
Percentage of address space in use by end-sites:   99.0
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  237374

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:   193698
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:   55273
APNIC Deaggregation factor:3.50
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:  191862
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:79147
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:9007
APNIC Prefixes per ASN:   21.30
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   2525
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   1346
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.0
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 26
Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:   3968
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:  767572739
Equivalent to 45 /8s, 192 /16s and 59 /24s
APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations)  23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319,
   58368-59391, 63488-64098, 64297-64395, 131072-139577
APNIC Address Blocks 1/8,  14/8,  27/8,  36/8,  39/8,  42/8,  43/8,
49/8,  58/8,  59/8,  60/8,  61/8, 101/8, 103/8,
   106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8,
   116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8,
   123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8,
   163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8,
   203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8,
   222/8, 223/8,

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:211280
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:   100125
ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.11
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:   211152
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks:100055
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:18222
ARIN Prefixes per ASN:11.59

Re: What NMS do you use and why?

[Rich Brown]

> On Aug 17, 2018, at 8:00 AM, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 20:31:13 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Joe Loiacono mailto:jloia...@gmail.com>>
> To: William Herrin mailto:b...@herrin.us>>
> Cc: NANOG mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>, Colton Conor 
> mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com>>
> Subject: Re: What NMS do you use and why?
> Message-ID:
>   <593335944.184.1534379472982.JavaMail.jloia@DESKTOP-FDMC6S8>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> Consider also open-source FlowViewer for netflow capture and analysis. A lot 
> of very useful netflow based analytical tools in an easy UI. Sits on top of a 
> robust set of Carnegie-Mellon's high-capacity SiLK netflow tools.
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/flowviewer/ 
> 
> 
> Joe

About a year ago, I was horsing around with Netflow tools. I built a Docker 
image to make it easy to install FlowViewer. I also factored the FlowViewer 
source files to make it easier to install in a Docker instance. I have no 
opinion whether Docker would be a good solution for a high performance Netflow 
collector. However, this Dockerfile makes it easy (~15 minutes) to get started 
with testing.

Grab the files from my github repo's:

https://github.com/richb-hanover/FlowViewer
https://github.com/richb-hanover/docker-silk-flowviewer

I also made a couple other Docker instances of Netflow tools. They're mentioned 
in my blog: http://richb-hanover.com/netflow-collectors-for-home-networks/

Enjoy!

Rich Brown
Blueberry Hill Software