Research survey about cloud services operations

2018-12-03 Thread Yan Zhai
Hi there,

 we are researchers from University of Wisconsin Madison. Our research is
about cloud computing and system security. Currently we are surveying on a
few facts about how cloud tenants operate their services. The purpose of
the survey is to justify a few design questions so that our research can be
practical for real world applications. I am wondering if you could kindly
help us by filling out a few simple general questions hosted on Typeform:
https://yanzhai.typeform.com/to/sZ0Yjm . The survey is fully anonymous. Any
of your feedback would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you very much!
Yan


Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge

2018-12-03 Thread Martin List-Petersen

We have CenturyLink, Cogent, NTT and Viatel in the mix for IP transit.

CenturyLink and Cogent are unproblematic, unless you change something 
(like upgrading a circuit).


Cogent will fix billing issues quickly, but they do crop up.

CenturyLink is not very communicative. Can't fault the service, but 
their billing department is a mess.


We've had Viatel for years without much issues. They are an european Tier 2.

NTT only just enabled their PoP where we haul our backhaul from, so time 
will show. But they've been very proactive.


We used to have PacketExchange, but left them because they were a mess. 
They were taken over by or merged with GTT eventually. We moved to 
Tiscali back then, which became TInet and then changed name 2 more times 
before they got swallowed up by GTT. So we ended up where we started .. 
including all the problems that came with it.


Connectivity was solid enough, once you didn't have to deal with them. 
But when they increased our monthly pricing, which already was on the 
higher scale of what we pay in the mix ... we told them to go away.


Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
Airwire Ltd.


On 03/12/2018 14:11, Tom Beecher wrote:

There are quite a few not crappy vendors out there, regardless of my snark.
NTT is definitely one of the better ones.

Unfortunately, telecommunications billing is only slightly less complex
than medical billing, and there are plenty of vendors that have made those
decisions to invest in more financial engineering than technical since, as
has been said, they can.





On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 9:05 AM Martin List-Petersen 
wrote:


On 03/12/2018 14:01, Tom Beecher wrote:

"Cancelled all GTT connections and replaced them
with a carrier, that doesn't try to screw their customer base."

Who is this magical unicorn? :)


Replaced that circuit with NTT. So far, very pleased with that.

Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
Airwire Ltd.




On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:51 AM Martin List-Petersen 
wrote:


On 02/12/2018 22:06, Brandon Wade via NANOG wrote:

We've been a GTT customer for several years and on our latest bill we
now have a "Regulatory Recovery Surcharge" of almost 10% tacked on. We
only purchase IP Transit services from them, nothing else, and have
never had any fees tacked on top of our contracted agreed upon amount.
Has anyone else ran into this? If this is a legit "surcharge" any idea
of why we were never charged for that before? I figured I'd reach out

to

the community on this prior to jumping to further conclusions.

-Brandon


Hi,

I'm not sure, if thats a stateside thing, but GTT started increasing the
prices on customers that were out of contract to try and get them back
into a long term contract.

For us that was the last straw, where we simply told them to take their
IP transit and keep it. Cancelled all GTT connections and replaced them
with a carrier, that doesn't try to screw their customer base.

Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
--
Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair
http://www.airwire.ie
Phone: 091-395 000
Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in
Ireland No. 508961






--
Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair
http://www.airwire.ie
Phone: 091-395 000
Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in
Ireland No. 508961






--
Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair
http://www.airwire.ie
Phone: 091-395 000
Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in 
Ireland No. 508961


Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge

2018-12-03 Thread Tom Beecher
There are quite a few not crappy vendors out there, regardless of my snark.
NTT is definitely one of the better ones.

Unfortunately, telecommunications billing is only slightly less complex
than medical billing, and there are plenty of vendors that have made those
decisions to invest in more financial engineering than technical since, as
has been said, they can.





On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 9:05 AM Martin List-Petersen 
wrote:

> On 03/12/2018 14:01, Tom Beecher wrote:
> > "Cancelled all GTT connections and replaced them
> > with a carrier, that doesn't try to screw their customer base."
> >
> > Who is this magical unicorn? :)
>
> Replaced that circuit with NTT. So far, very pleased with that.
>
> Kind regards,
> Martin List-Petersen
> Airwire Ltd.
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:51 AM Martin List-Petersen 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/12/2018 22:06, Brandon Wade via NANOG wrote:
> >>> We've been a GTT customer for several years and on our latest bill we
> >>> now have a "Regulatory Recovery Surcharge" of almost 10% tacked on. We
> >>> only purchase IP Transit services from them, nothing else, and have
> >>> never had any fees tacked on top of our contracted agreed upon amount.
> >>> Has anyone else ran into this? If this is a legit "surcharge" any idea
> >>> of why we were never charged for that before? I figured I'd reach out
> to
> >>> the community on this prior to jumping to further conclusions.
> >>>
> >>> -Brandon
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm not sure, if thats a stateside thing, but GTT started increasing the
> >> prices on customers that were out of contract to try and get them back
> >> into a long term contract.
> >>
> >> For us that was the last straw, where we simply told them to take their
> >> IP transit and keep it. Cancelled all GTT connections and replaced them
> >> with a carrier, that doesn't try to screw their customer base.
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Martin List-Petersen
> >> --
> >> Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair
> >> http://www.airwire.ie
> >> Phone: 091-395 000
> >> Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in
> >> Ireland No. 508961
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair
> http://www.airwire.ie
> Phone: 091-395 000
> Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in
> Ireland No. 508961
>


Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge

2018-12-03 Thread Martin List-Petersen

On 03/12/2018 14:01, Tom Beecher wrote:

"Cancelled all GTT connections and replaced them
with a carrier, that doesn't try to screw their customer base."

Who is this magical unicorn? :)


Replaced that circuit with NTT. So far, very pleased with that.

Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
Airwire Ltd.




On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:51 AM Martin List-Petersen 
wrote:


On 02/12/2018 22:06, Brandon Wade via NANOG wrote:

We've been a GTT customer for several years and on our latest bill we
now have a "Regulatory Recovery Surcharge" of almost 10% tacked on. We
only purchase IP Transit services from them, nothing else, and have
never had any fees tacked on top of our contracted agreed upon amount.
Has anyone else ran into this? If this is a legit "surcharge" any idea
of why we were never charged for that before? I figured I'd reach out to
the community on this prior to jumping to further conclusions.

-Brandon


Hi,

I'm not sure, if thats a stateside thing, but GTT started increasing the
prices on customers that were out of contract to try and get them back
into a long term contract.

For us that was the last straw, where we simply told them to take their
IP transit and keep it. Cancelled all GTT connections and replaced them
with a carrier, that doesn't try to screw their customer base.

Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
--
Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair
http://www.airwire.ie
Phone: 091-395 000
Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in
Ireland No. 508961






--
Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair
http://www.airwire.ie
Phone: 091-395 000
Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in 
Ireland No. 508961


Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge

2018-12-03 Thread Mike Hammett
"Should not". I hear of ISPs fighting it all of the time. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message -

From: "Matt Harris"  
To: na...@ics-il.net 
Cc: brandonw...@yahoo.com, "North American Network Operators' Group" 
 
Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2018 4:48:45 PM 
Subject: Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge 




On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:41 PM Mike Hammett < na...@ics-il.net > wrote: 



Maybe this? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Service_Fund 
https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service-fund 
https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service 


Kinda crappy they don't spell it out. Well, no, I guess USF would be closer to 
+-18%. 







USF should not apply to IP transit connectivity wherein the connection between 
the transit provider and the customer does not cross state lines. 




Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge

2018-12-03 Thread Tom Beecher
"Cancelled all GTT connections and replaced them
with a carrier, that doesn't try to screw their customer base."

Who is this magical unicorn? :)

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:51 AM Martin List-Petersen 
wrote:

> On 02/12/2018 22:06, Brandon Wade via NANOG wrote:
> > We've been a GTT customer for several years and on our latest bill we
> > now have a "Regulatory Recovery Surcharge" of almost 10% tacked on. We
> > only purchase IP Transit services from them, nothing else, and have
> > never had any fees tacked on top of our contracted agreed upon amount.
> > Has anyone else ran into this? If this is a legit "surcharge" any idea
> > of why we were never charged for that before? I figured I'd reach out to
> > the community on this prior to jumping to further conclusions.
> >
> > -Brandon
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure, if thats a stateside thing, but GTT started increasing the
> prices on customers that were out of contract to try and get them back
> into a long term contract.
>
> For us that was the last straw, where we simply told them to take their
> IP transit and keep it. Cancelled all GTT connections and replaced them
> with a carrier, that doesn't try to screw their customer base.
>
> Kind regards,
> Martin List-Petersen
> --
> Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair
> http://www.airwire.ie
> Phone: 091-395 000
> Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in
> Ireland No. 508961
>


Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge

2018-12-03 Thread Martin List-Petersen

On 02/12/2018 22:06, Brandon Wade via NANOG wrote:
We've been a GTT customer for several years and on our latest bill we 
now have a "Regulatory Recovery Surcharge" of almost 10% tacked on. We 
only purchase IP Transit services from them, nothing else, and have 
never had any fees tacked on top of our contracted agreed upon amount. 
Has anyone else ran into this? If this is a legit "surcharge" any idea 
of why we were never charged for that before? I figured I'd reach out to 
the community on this prior to jumping to further conclusions.


-Brandon


Hi,

I'm not sure, if thats a stateside thing, but GTT started increasing the 
prices on customers that were out of contract to try and get them back 
into a long term contract.


For us that was the last straw, where we simply told them to take their 
IP transit and keep it. Cancelled all GTT connections and replaced them 
with a carrier, that doesn't try to screw their customer base.


Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
--
Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair
http://www.airwire.ie
Phone: 091-395 000
Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in 
Ireland No. 508961


Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge

2018-12-03 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Down on the farm

-- 
 J. Hellenthal

The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a 
lot about anticipated traffic volume.

> On Dec 2, 2018, at 20:17, bob evans  wrote:
> 
> I think it's because they need to...not for any legal reason, but to
> increase cash flow by every penny possible. As they just spend 2.3 billion
> dollars on an acquisition. Every penny they can add to a bill is an
> attempt to slow the bleeding that resulting from over borrowing.
> 
> 3600 employees, huge major acquisitions half a billion here - 2 billion
> there, where is this money coming from? Buying sales organizations with no
> network?
> 
> One has to ask is this a secretly government funded/owned business? If so,
> which government? Ours?
> 
> Bob Evans
> CTO/Founder
> 
>>> On Dec 2, 2018, at 6:04 PM, Clayton Zekelman  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I can't imagine how the corporate sociopaths could justify charging an
>>> American recovery fee on a service delivered in Canada.
>> 
>> I would speculate that the reason is ever popular ‘because they can”.
>> 
>> James R. Cutler
>> james.cut...@consultant.com
>> PGP keys at http://pgp.mit.edu
> 
>