On 14/Feb/19 23:25, Brandon Martin wrote:
>
>
> The CES is...wonky. My Foundry/Brocade/Extreme SEs have steered me
> away from them on more than one occasion.
>
> The CER is fine but of course more expensive. It'll take a full
> Internet table, though, which is handy.
>
> For AE resi
On 14/Feb/19 17:10, Aaron Gould wrote:
> Not sure if this is what y'all are talking about, but I use lots of Juniper
> ACX5048 (previously Cisco ME3600 or ASR9000) for mpls-capable router edging
> in native ip/ethernet from ftth gpon network into mpls l2circuits and LOTS of
> vrf vrf for
On 14/Feb/19 17:02, Aaron Gould wrote:
> To not get off-topic too much, since you mentioned MX204, please tell me, do
> you know if it is a nice MPLS P/PE box ? If so, is it quite capable in its
> ability to do L3 VPN's, L2 VPN's (l2circuit mainly, but also curious of vpls,
> evpn).
We've
Hey,
Have you guys seen any ODM vendor that makes platforms based on Tomahawk 3
or later OSPF optics ?
Thank you
Sam
Need assistance with exporting flow data for inside interface of cgnat ams0
aggregated multiservice interface
I have MX960 with MS-MPC-128G doing cgnat using AMS0 (aggregated
multiservice of underlying mams interfaces) using next-hop-style vrf-aware
cgnat.
I need the cgnat inside domain
Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) (2018-09-18):> I also found your analysis very
interesting and useful. Thanks for that.
>
>> What do you think about adding graphs that show the amount of actually
>> unreachable prefixes and IP space? (prefix where no alternative
>> valid/unknown announcement exists)
On 2/14/19 12:08 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
As a pure FTTH Active-E AN, I still think the Brocade (Extreme) CER/CES
is a good box.
The CES is...wonky. My Foundry/Brocade/Extreme SEs have steered me away
from them on more than one occasion.
The CER is fine but of course more expensive. It'll
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019, Aaron Gould wrote:
Not sure if this is what y'all are talking about, but I use lots of Juniper
ACX5048 (previously Cisco ME3600 or ASR9000) for mpls-capable router edging in
native ip/ethernet from ftth gpon network into mpls l2circuits and LOTS of
vrf vrf for public
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Colton Conor wrote:
Just wondering, but what IP-capable MPLS switches are people using to
deploy AE to residential internet connections? Most 48 port AE switches
from repetuable vendors are crazy expensive, and I can't see how the ROI
would ever work compared to GPON.
> Did this tool die on the vine?
> https://cyclops.cs.ucla.edu/
Not sure I would express it that way
https://www.cs.ucla.edu/thousandeyes-a-look-inside-two-ucla-alumnis-273-million-startup/
--
Simon.
thanks for all feedback, I have tried to summarize my thoughts in a video,
hoping this is useful set of notes https://youtu.be/4gihKxb6uys
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 9:46 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 15/Dec/18 19:37, nanog-...@mail.com wrote:
>
> >
> > I certainly subscribe to the notion that
> Congrats Jay, this is awesome news!
Thanks, Alex!
> I’m interested to hear what is preventing you from creating ROAs for all of
> your announcements.
>
> > We will publish more ROAs over time. Thusfar we have been utilizing
> > ARIN's hosted model, but down the road ARIN's delegated
A much more common configuration is a combination of a low cost 48-port L2
aggregation switch, something whitebox or similar to a Taiwanese OEM/ODM
such as edgecore, with a single 10GbE uplink to a small MPLS-capable
router. One 10Gbps link can fit a great many 1GbE active-E residential
customers
Aaron,
Indeed the ACX5048 is a great box but expensive. I was talking about using
the Gig-e ports of a 48 port switch to face subscribers, and asking what
low cost IP-Capable MPLS capable 48 port switch fits that role. Basically
an access switch for AE.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 9:10 AM Aaron
It frightens me when I realize how long it's been since I was active in
NANOG (2006?, but a lot before then). Happily, I'm surfacing from a lot
of health and personal issues, and starting to do some consulting.
*waves to lots of old friends, thinking of the time, in frustration,
that I called
Not sure if this is what y'all are talking about, but I use lots of Juniper
ACX5048 (previously Cisco ME3600 or ASR9000) for mpls-capable router edging in
native ip/ethernet from ftth gpon network into mpls l2circuits and LOTS of
vrf vrf for public ip, vrf for cgnat for private ip, vrf for
To not get off-topic too much, since you mentioned MX204, please tell me, do
you know if it is a nice MPLS P/PE box ? If so, is it quite capable in its
ability to do L3 VPN's, L2 VPN's (l2circuit mainly, but also curious of vpls,
evpn).
Actually I'm considering it as a router for my ENNI
On 14/Feb/19 14:04, Alain Hebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unlucky as always, we had issues with the chassis of a MX104 about
> every years since we installed.
Are you using the MX104 as a route reflector? If so, make one of the
VM's your alternative for this function :-).
If you're not doing
Hi,
Unlucky as always, we had issues with the chassis of a MX104 about
every years since we installed.
I thinking the vibration from the train track above our location
might be having an effect on connectors in those chassis, but we never
got a "autopsy" report back from JNP
19 matches
Mail list logo
