Yeah, check with the DoD NIC 100% of the time. Probably a pretty safe bet
that unless they are a US government agency, they're not authorized.
For anyone who did not attend NANOG last week, representatives from NCIS
and the FBI reminded the audience in no uncertain terms that "industry
standard
Thanks Andrew
Clearwater does some interesting things. Compared to other projects, they
seem to have given a lot of thought to scalability.
But I am a bit surprised of their focus on I- S-CSCF & BGCF.
I guess they are assuming either MNO customers already equipped with SBC
able to do the
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:13 AM Boyle, Patrick via NANOG
wrote:
> We are advertising the same prefix to ISP A & ISP B. When looking at
> various route servers across the world, I always see the path through ISP A
> in the BGP table, but most don’t show a path at all through ISP B (some do,
> like
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Except for the email on ARIN's details, does anyone else have a contact for
> the DoD?
>
> We are experiencing a situation with a 3rd party (direct peer), wanting to
> advertise DoD address space to us, and we need to
Thanks Dovid.
Sipgate needs seems very similar to our own and I’ve got quite a few good
pointers from that talk.
By the way, a lot of these comcon sessions looks quite interesting, I think
I will play a few others.
Le mer. 30 oct. 2019 à 23:49, Dovid Bender a écrit :
> This was discussed in
> On Oct 31, 2019, at 3:12 PM, Boyle, Patrick via NANOG wrote:
>
> We are advertising the same prefix to ISP A & ISP B. When looking at various
> route servers across the world, I always see the path through ISP A in the
> BGP table, but most don’t show a path at all through ISP B (some do,
Hi Everyone,
Thank you very much for all the information, suggestions, and feedback.
We have been contacted by the NCIS now, and will be discussing the matter
further with them.
I don't think I'm comfortable, or feel it is justified, to discuss this
matter further publicly. I now find myself
22/8 is actively used by DoD, just not publicly. It would be in your best
interest to not accept routes for it.
if you need something more official, contact the DoD NIC directly at the
email address specified in WHOIS.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:32 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04,
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:13 PM Jason Biel wrote:
> 22/8 is actively used by DoD, just not publicly. It would be in your best
> interest to not accept routes for it.
>
> if you need something more official, contact the DoD NIC directly at the
> email address specified in WHOIS.
>
>
Precisely what
We are advertising the same prefix to ISP A & ISP B. When looking at various
route servers across the world, I always see the path through ISP A in the BGP
table, but most don't show a path at all through ISP B (some do, like Oregon
IX). I would expect any router with the full table to show
On 2019-11-04 13:33, Chris Knipe wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:13 PM Jason Biel wrote:
22/8 is actively used by DoD, just not publicly. It would be in your
best interest to not accept routes for it.
if you need something more official, contact the DoD NIC directly at
the email address
hey there,
we've put together a blog post about Virginia beach developments and how it can
reshape some of the ways we
have been designing our networks.
https://www.infrapedia.com/post/virginia-beach-a-new-hub-is-born
Mehmet
Ex-757'er (757 = Virginia Beach.)
Dead area tech wise. Bad job
hey there,
we've put together a blog post about Virginia beach developments and how it
can reshape some of the ways we have been designing our networks.
https://www.infrapedia.com/post/virginia-beach-a-new-hub-is-born
I would love to hear some feedback about this, feel free to contact me
I heard that we would be testing to Dallas or something like that from my ISP
in San Antonio.
I think I heard that customer CPE routers will soon have that testing
functionality built into them.
-Aaron
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Livingood, Jason
Sent:
I do not. But in the FCC’s Measuring Broadband America program (MBA) they have
SamKnows measurement servers located in a few places so perhaps that is what
they mean? See
https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/reports/measuring-broadband-america/measuring-fixed-broadband-eighth-report
which says
Hello,
Does anyone know how to get in touch with a real world contact at
Chrter/Spectrum Abuse? One of their users is causing significant issues for
one of my dedicated hosting customers - from attempting to extort and
blackmail them to uploading borderline to possible Child Pornography on on
My routing experience has to treat these as bogons unless you really
need to be routing DoD space which is not so common. A lot of entities
have used this space to carry their b.s..
As another frequent poster rights YMMV.
>From experience, Richard Golodner
On 11/4/19 9:56 PM, Grant Taylor via
On 11/4/19 1:55 AM, Chris Knipe wrote:
We are experiencing a situation with a 3rd party (direct peer), wanting
to advertise DoD address space to us, and we need to confirm whether
they are allowed to do so or not.
That sounds like someone is squatting on DoD IP space, likely for
something
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 11:20 AM Alarig Le Lay wrote:
>
> There is no route inside this /8:
> bird> show route primary where net ~ [ 22.0.0.0/8+ ]
> bird>
>
> Regards,
> --
> Alarig
>
I know that much - but just because it's not advertised, doesn't mean
you're allowed to use it?
Hi Guys,
Except for the email on ARIN's details, does anyone else have a contact for
the DoD?
We are experiencing a situation with a 3rd party (direct peer), wanting to
advertise DoD address space to us, and we need to confirm whether they are
allowed to do so or not.
Range in question is the
maybe a typo, start from 23/8 not 22/8
From: NANOG on behalf of Chris Knipe
Sent: Monday, November 4, 2019 4:55:47 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: DoD IP Space
Hi Guys,
Except for the email on ARIN's details, does anyone else have a contact for the
DoD?
We are
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0200,
Chris Knipe wrote
a message of 35 lines which said:
> We are experiencing a situation with a 3rd party (direct peer),
> wanting to advertise DoD address space to us, and we need to confirm
> whether they are allowed to do so or not.
The US military
Hi,
On lun. 4 nov. 10:55:47 2019, Chris Knipe wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Except for the email on ARIN's details, does anyone else have a contact for
> the DoD?
>
> We are experiencing a situation with a 3rd party (direct peer), wanting to
> advertise DoD address space to us, and we need to confirm
On 04/11/2019 10:23, Chris Knipe wrote:
> I know that much - but just because it's not advertised, doesn't mean
> you're allowed to use it?
It means that you’re not supposed to advertise it to your peers, at least.
The usage of public-but-not-used space inside networks isn’t really my
problem
24 matches
Mail list logo
