Re: Disney+ Geolocation issues

For Disney, isn't it the same "house" ? They're trying to control different pricing for different markets. Similar to how Spotify costs a lot less in Indonesia and the Philippines. This is where a VPN comes in handy. - Ethan

someone, probably someone who scraped your group, sent me a virus as a .doc file

enjoy, boys & girls https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/d0737edbc17741ab9ee251586cf514552da09924920ad56aa3413334b312dacc/detection

Re: ECN

Owen DeLong writes: > Like it or not (and I really don’t), the majority of modern CDNs are > using TCP over Anycast. > > It’s ugly and it’s prone to problems like this. It’s nice to see a > customer with know-how actually publicizing and digging into the > problem. Thanks. I do plan to write

Re: ECN

Baldur Norddahl writes: > I am testing disabling our use of ECMP as it is not strictly necessary > and we are moving to a new platform anyway. Waiting for feedback from > the customer to hear if this fixes the issue. Which I can confirm that it does. Thank you for the speedy resolution! :)

Re: TCP and anycast (was Re: ECN)

> RFC 7094 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7094) describes the pitfalls > & risks of using TCP with an anycast address. and two decades of operational experience are that prudent deployments just work. randy

Intergovernmental Advisory Committee: Disaster Response Coordination

The FCC's IAC has published its report on emergency communication impacts of the various hurricanes and disasters in 2018 and early 2019. These include Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, Maria, Michael and Nate. No surprises. I've seen essentially all of the issues and recommendations in other

Boston Fiber Optic Networks

I am looking to discuss off list the fiber optic landscape for greater Boston. Trying to understand who are the key players. Thanks. Regards, Roderick. Roderick Beck VP of Business Development United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com New York

Re: Disney+ Geolocation issues

The word on the street (that Disney pushed) was that "we are seeing higher than expected demand" WTF, you are in AWS, don't know how to autoscale? On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:06 AM Ethan O'Toole wrote: > > For Disney, isn't it the same "house" ? > > They're trying to control different pricing

Re: Boston Fiber Optic Networks

Definitely good. However, you cant tell shared fiber or sole/joint conduit builds via Infrapedia. You also do not need a referral. That matters in Boston. Boston also has an outstanding shadow conduit system. You do need local help. Talk to Janes and Gavin at Towardex. Let me know if you need an

Re: Boston Fiber Optic Networks

live.infrapedia.com has an extensive list of networks. On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 13:12 Rod Beck wrote: > I am looking to discuss off list the fiber optic landscape for greater > Boston. Trying to understand who are the key players. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > > Roderick. > > Roderick Beck > VP of

Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter

I can’t find a single cls that is a good peering spot Latam has level3 cls in chile which is good location and has lots of networks ixp. That is like only one I am aware, doing business is quite horrible there. Everything is over priced, slow burocraric. On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 19:18 Sean

Landing Stations used as datacenter

Hey there I have been putting my thoughts on Infrapedia blog and sharing with folks like https://www.infrapedia.com/post/top20cities-datacenters I am working on a new article and this time my topic will be looking at cable landing stations(cls). Do you consider cable landing stations as a

Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter

On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Mehmet Akcin wrote: I am not a big fan of CLS deployments. They have limited networks ( like only carriers and no eyeballs) and very expensive connectivity (usually)  Sometimes there isn't a choice, i.e. islands or other constrained geographies. But I am not a fan of

Re: TCP and anycast (was Re: ECN)

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:54 AM Randy Bush wrote: > > > RFC 7094 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7094) describes the pitfalls > > & risks of using TCP with an anycast address. > > and two decades of operational experience are that prudent deployments > just work. I agree with Bill/Randy here...

Re: TCP and anycast (was Re: ECN)

>>> RFC 7094 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7094) describes the pitfalls >>> & risks of using TCP with an anycast address. >> >> and two decades of operational experience are that prudent deployments >> just work. > > I agree with Bill/Randy here... this does just work if you understand > your

Re: TCP and anycast (was Re: ECN)

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:10 AM Bill Woodcock wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Anoop Ghanwani wrote: > > RFC 7094 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7094) describes the pitfalls & risks of using TCP with an anycast address. It recognizes that there are valid use cases for it, though. > >

Re: TCP and anycast (was Re: ECN)

> On Nov 14, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Anoop Ghanwani wrote: > RFC 7094 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7094) describes the pitfalls & risks > of using TCP with an anycast address. It recognizes that there are valid use > cases for it, though. > Specifically, section 3.1 says this: >Most

Re: ECN

On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 22:57, Lukas Tribus wrote: > In fact I believe everything beyond the 5-tuple is just a bad idea to > base your hash on. Here are some examples (not quite as straight > forward than the TOS/ECN case here): ACK. > TTL: >

Re: Disney+ Geolocation issues

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019, at 15:49, Matthew Huff wrote: > It’s not about optimization, it’s about the contract with the content > providers. For Disney, isn't it the same "house" ?

Re: Disney+ Geolocation issues

It is amazing how much variance there is between different IP GEO data sets, we recently switched from MaxMind to Neustar, there was a huge difference between the two…. -John