Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network

oops. missed a spot. -Ben Cannon CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC b...@6by7.net > On Mar 2, 2020, at 2:36 PM, David Burns wrote: > > Did you compare CERNET with commodity networks? (My anecdotal observations > from a couple years ago suggest that Internet2 to

Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network

On 15/Mar/20 22:51, Frank Habicht wrote: > > thanks for the "quotes", Mark. I agree. > > https://www.caida.org/publications/presentations/2018/investigating_causes_congestion_african_afrinic/investigating_causes_congestion_african_afrinic.pdf > > page 23: > Results Overview > • No evidence of

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

On 15/Mar/20 00:12, Eric M. Carroll wrote: > > There is good news here. The infrastructure has never been better > positioned to support this kind of mass event. We can shop from home, > work from home, get groceries from home, order drugs, get > entertainment, all via IP. The ISP community

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

I suggest the NANOG community needs to actively recognize this risks becoming the largest north american wide test of mass work from home that has happened since I got involved in the public internet back in 1986. It may also drive some permanent changes in traffic patterns as high volume remote

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

I think there's a bit of a misunderstanding of what I'm trying to say here. We have dual private lines from two Tier I providers. These interconnect all major hospitals and our data centers. We also have a third metro connection that connects things regionally. We have DIA on top of that. I think

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

On 2020-03-16, at 15:40, Mike Bolitho wrote: > > I think people are vastly underestimating just how much $aaS there is within > the medical field. I recently had to reschedule an X-ray because the license manager for the X-ray machine was acting up. I don’t think people have a grasp for how

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

On 16/Mar/20 16:13, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > > Most misinformation is being carried nowadays by peer-to-peer > messaging (like WhatsApp) and social networks (like Facebook and > Instagram), so even if a miracle device appeared and was put in front > of all mail systems,  it would have very little

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

Le 16/03/2020 à 14:58, Mark Tinka a écrit : On 15/Mar/20 00:12, Eric M. Carroll wrote: There is good news here. The infrastructure has never been better positioned to support this kind of mass event. We can shop from home, work from home, get groceries from home, order drugs, get

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

On 16/Mar/20 16:04, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > > > There is no other way to do that information filterning now. Nobody > has any authority of knowing better than others. > > MUAs filters yes. (mail user agent) > > Look at all data you receive, identify patterns, then act. That's all > one can

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

> Folks saw congestion from a massive free content drop this past week. > But as folks had called out, that was the CDN angle of distributing that > content rather than the actual game play. There is a rather long discussion > about that in the "akamai yesterday - what in the world was that"

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

> > > > > > As readier as the Internet is today, part of the mega spread of the > > fallout from the Coronavirus is because information is not only > > traveling way faster, a lot of it is also not (necessarily) verified or > > moderated before being shared with is consumers. > > > There is no

access to sealandqualityfoods.com from Calgary

Hi Anyone in the Calgary area able to do a quick test? I'm troubleshooting access to sealandqualityfoods.com (resolving as 34.95.13.225 for me). Site is fine from where I am in Ontario, but reported down in Calgary. I do not know what, if any errror messages are being seen from a browser in

Re: backtracking forged packets?

    In my opinion you can, just that the participants are not willing to do so due, in part, to the lack of acceptance of BCP38. - Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel:

Re: backtracking forged packets?

On 2020-03-14 23:50, Damian Menscher wrote: > I don't recommend filtering the SYN-ACK packets. That's what Octolus did, > and the result was leaving half-open SYN_RECV connections on all the nodes > used for reflection. That has two downsides: > > - the reflectors will retry the SYN-ACK

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

> On Mar 16, 2020, at 07:04 , Alexandre Petrescu > wrote: > > > Le 16/03/2020 à 14:58, Mark Tinka a écrit : >> >> On 15/Mar/20 00:12, Eric M. Carroll wrote: >> >> >>> There is good news here. The infrastructure has never been better >>> positioned to support this kind of mass event. We

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

Mike- The TSP program provides for priority treatment for only 2 things : provisioning of new capacity, and restoration of capacity. It provides no accommodations for intermittent degradation events upstream. Source : DHC Office of Emergency Communications, TSP Program Office, TSP Vendor

Re: sflow -> aggregated aspath visualization?

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 06:54:15PM +, Adam Thompson wrote: > If anyone knows of tools capable of generating easy-to-understand reports, > dashboards, including historical “what changed this week”-type data, please > let me know. > If you have access to a modern ELK stack, you could try out

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

On this subject, this is worth a read: https://transition.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/emergency-information/Pandemic_Comms_Impact_Study_%28December%202007%29.pdf Department of Homeland Security Pandemic Influenza Impact on Communications Networks Study Dec 2007 JL From: NANOG on behalf of Tom Beecher

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

As an ex-broadcaster, I have never seen one of these letters. Even during our 1989 earthquake. In fact, I knew of one station that ordered a genset as power was down after the earthquake for several days and it was commandeered by LE as they were being driven to the transmitter site, three

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

[SNIP] >> Has worked very well for me in Santa Clara County so far. > > How is Santa Clara County informing their citizens? Some website or some SMS > (short text message on cellular)? > > > > My city sent me two paper letters Saturday, but no numbers about cases. I > had to go to

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

Le 16/03/2020 à 15:22, Mark Tinka a écrit : On 16/Mar/20 16:04, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: There is no other way to do that information filterning now. Nobody has any authority of knowing better than others. MUAs filters yes. (mail user agent) Look at all data you receive, identify

Re: backtracking forged packets?

On 2020-03-13 23:23, William Herrin wrote: > Can anyone suggest tools, techniques and helpful contacts for > backtracking spoofed packets? At the moment someone is forging TCP > syns from my address block. I'm getting the syn/ack and icmp > unreachable backscatter. Enough that my service provider

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

Le 16/03/2020 à 20:08, Owen DeLong a écrit : On Mar 16, 2020, at 07:04 , Alexandre Petrescu mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com>> wrote: Le 16/03/2020 à 14:58, Mark Tinka a écrit : On 15/Mar/20 00:12, Eric M. Carroll wrote: There is good news here. The infrastructure has never been

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

> On Mar 16, 2020, at 4:24 PM, james jones wrote: > > Fuel priority? They expecting shortage and/or power outages? > I suspect it’s more to solve issues with truck drivers going to work and their job is to deliver fuel. Some areas have been instituting curfews and this would satisfy the

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

https://hgis.uw.edu/virus Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 16, 2020, at 4:17 PM, Alexandre Petrescu > wrote: > >  > > > Le 16/03/2020 à 20:08, Owen DeLong a écrit : >> >> On Mar 16, 2020, at 07:04 , Alexandre Petrescu wrote: Le 16/03/2020 à 14:58, Mark Tinka a

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

In response to a snarky question offlist. Yes, the DHS letters are just copies. Yes, the DHS letters are easy to counterfeit. Not a lawyer, but counterfeiting an official federal document during a national state of emergency likely violates many federal and state laws. DON'T DO IT. On

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:51 AM Livingood, Jason < jason_living...@comcast.com> wrote: > > Folks saw congestion from a massive free content drop this past week. > > But as folks had called out, that was the CDN angle of distributing that > content rather than the actual game play. There is a

DHS letters for fuel and facility access

On some other mailing lists, FCC licensed operators are reporting they have received letters from the Department of Homeland Security authorizing "access" and "fuel" priority. Occasionally, DHS issues these letters after natural disasters such as hurricanes for hospitals and critical

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

Fuel priority? They expecting shortage and/or power outages? -James On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:21 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > > On some other mailing lists, FCC licensed operators are reporting they > have received letters from the Department of Homeland Security authorizing > "access" and "fuel"

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

Its a form letter. Same letter is printed no matter what disaster its for. I don't think they are expecting power outages (unless there is a co-disaster at the same time). Its just the standard form. On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, james jones wrote: Fuel priority? They expecting shortage and/or

Fwd: Your message to NANOG awaits moderator approval

fyi my figure of the map was cut by mailman software at nanog Message transféré Sujet : Your message to NANOG awaits moderator approval Date : Mon, 16 Mar 2020 20:37:58 + De :nanog-ow...@nanog.org Pour : alexandre.petre...@gmail.com Your mail to 'NANOG'

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

Le 16/03/2020 à 21:42, sro...@ronan-online.com a écrit : https://hgis.uw.edu/virus It does not say by City.  I cant find my city, department not even region. I know all these URLs with maps, I can paste them if y ou wish. I watch them every day. Alex Sent

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

It goes down to county level. On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 4:48 PM Alexandre Petrescu < alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 16/03/2020 à 21:42, sro...@ronan-online.com a écrit : > > https://hgis.uw.edu/virus > > > It does not say by City. I cant find my city, department not even region. > > I

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

It’s true, we’re all here, and we’re standing by. Also if anyone on NANOG needs something we can do, please reach out to me via email and I will make it happen. You’re not alone during times of crisis. -Ben. -Ben Cannon CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC b...@6by7.net

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

Got it! Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 16, 2020, at 4:26 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > >  > >> On Mar 16, 2020, at 4:24 PM, james jones wrote: >> >> Fuel priority? They expecting shortage and/or power outages? >> > > I suspect it’s more to solve issues with truck drivers going to work and >

Re: sflow -> aggregated aspath visualization?

You could use Prometheus / Grafana to build the dashboards. The following example is a starting point (top ASNs / Countries by traffic volume): https://grafana.com/grafana/dashboards/11146 The example could be modified to make the make router / interface selectable, or cloned to create separate

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

Le 16/03/2020 à 23:18, Chris Boyd a écrit : On Mar 16, 2020, at 3:15 PM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: Please tell me about your city: do you know the numbers in your city? How did you get the info? Austin’s health department has a web page with the current confirmed infection count, as

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

We (Verizon not me) lost a central office during 9/11 because it ran out of fuel - the tankers were staged but we’re not allowed to enter Manhattan. This clears that pathway for us now, and it’s fairly standard protocol since. -Ben > On Mar 16, 2020, at 1:20 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: > >  >

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

> On Mar 16, 2020, at 3:15 PM, Alexandre Petrescu > wrote: > > Please tell me about your city: do you know the numbers in your city? How > did you get the info? Austin’s health department has a web page with the current confirmed infection count, as well as a bunch of recommendations for

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

The SF Bay Area shelter in place rules specifically exempt news media, telecommunications and internet including infrastructure services thereof (presumably large internet companies, network and security vendors, etc), fuel deliveries. I could use infrastructure vendors excuse but

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

--- alexandre.petre...@gmail.com wrote: From: Alexandre Petrescu   That map does not show Texas, as far as I know America (USA) geography. --- Being raised in Texas in a family that've been there for a buncha generations, I know that at least some

Re: DHS letters for fuel and facility access

I get that thanks, wasn’t trying to be snarky just genuinely curious. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 16, 2020, at 4:46 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: > >  > In response to a snarky question offlist. Yes, the DHS letters are just > copies. Yes, the DHS letters are easy to counterfeit. > > Not a

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

> On Mar 16, 2020, at 13:15 , Alexandre Petrescu > wrote: > > > > Le 16/03/2020 à 20:08, Owen DeLong a écrit : >> >> >>> On Mar 16, 2020, at 07:04 , Alexandre Petrescu >>> mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le 16/03/2020 à 14:58, Mark Tinka a écrit : On

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

> On Mar 16, 2020, at 13:37 , Alexandre Petrescu > wrote: > > a tv news report a few hours ago about status in America (USA) says the map > is this. > > That’s like a 2-3 week old map of state in US. > on another hand, a close person to me, speaking from Texas, he says 9 cases > in his

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

Le 16/03/2020 à 21:58, Owen DeLong a écrit : On Mar 16, 2020, at 13:15 , Alexandre Petrescu mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com>> wrote: Le 16/03/2020 à 20:08, Owen DeLong a écrit : On Mar 16, 2020, at 07:04 , Alexandre Petrescu > wrote: Le

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

a tv news report a few hours ago about status in America (USA) says the map is this. on another hand, a close person to me, speaking from Texas, he says 9 cases in his city in Texas.  That map does not show Texas, as far as I know America (USA) geography. Now, it might be that some regions

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

Le 16/03/2020 à 22:19, Owen DeLong a écrit : [SNIP] Has worked very well for me  in Santa Clara County so far. How is Santa Clara County informing their citizens?  Some website or some SMS (short text message on cellular)? My city sent me two paper letters Saturday, but no numbers