On 12/Jul/20 14:00, Paul Nash wrote:
> Not quite VSAT, but in the bad old SA days (pre-demicracy), I did some work
> for a company that used a UK-based satellite provider for data to the client
> (data was sent in the VBI), and dial-up for the traffic from the client.
>
> Still relied on a
On 11/Jul/20 02:16, Brandon Martin wrote:
>
> All of the part numbers I was able to find a description of (after
> sifting through the numerous pages copying the vulnerability
> disclosure) appeared to be low-cost, low- to mid-density pizza-box
> EPON OLTs. I didn't see any ONUs, but then I
On 13/Jul/20 15:41, Colin Stanners (lists) wrote:
>
> Looking at the Wikipedia article, it claims that Atlantis-2 “can
> already be upgraded with current technology to 160Gbit/s”. Would be
> interesting why that wasn’t already done on this 20-year-old cable –
> assuming that the underground
On 13/Jul/20 17:16, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
> Brazil-Angola cable is SACS, which for an European route would be
> paired with WACS to go from Angola to Portugal.
> Brazil-Cameroon cable is SAIL, which to get to Europe would be paired
> with ACE to go from Cameroon to Portugal or France.
WACS is
On 11/Jul/20 00:22, Alexander Neilson wrote:
>
> For these to be internet exposed presumably they must be including a
> router function and not simply doing some bridging of customer traffic.
Well, if the attacker were able to find a way into your bastion host...
Mark.
On 13/Jul/20 17:25, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> Obviously he means countries like Sweden, Ireland and Switzerland.
>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World#/media/File:Cold_War_alliances_mid-1975.svg
>>
>
> It's not clear why there's any relationship between third world status
> and the
On 12/Jul/20 17:19, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
> Alternative routes before EllaLink comes into operation would be one
> of the Brazil-Africa cables (one to Cameroon, the other to Angola) and
> then to Europe.
Are you talking about SAex?
There is SACS as well.
Mark.
On 12/Jul/20 23:43, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote:
> Almost no surprise they are all third world, still scary in a sense.
> Might just have to rethink a blacklist strategy for traffic
> originating behind those locations.
Still don't know what "third world" means (of course I do...), but
On 10/Jul/20 18:58, Owen DeLong wrote:
> https://www.zdnet.com/article/backdoor-accounts-discovered-in-29-ftth-devices-from-chinese-vendor-c-data/?ftag=TRE-03-10aaa6b=29077120342825113007211255328545=12920625=2211510872
>
>
> Wow… Just wow.
And unlike routers, switches (and OLT's) don't seem
On 12/Jul/20 17:05, Max Tulyev wrote:
>
>
> I see there is only one undersea cable going directly from Brazil to
> Europe. Why?
Have you ever read a C contract for a submarine cable build :-)?
Mark.
On 13/Jul/20 17:33, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Fiscal and logistic reasons, would be my guess.
Nick was being facetious :-).
Mark.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:01 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 12/Jul/20 17:19, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
>
> Alternative routes before EllaLink comes into operation would be one of
> the Brazil-Africa cables (one to Cameroon, the other to Angola) and then to
> Europe.
>
>
> Are you talking about
Mark Tinka wrote on 13/07/2020 16:03:
Still don't know what "third world" means (of course I do...), but
Obviously he means countries like Sweden, Ireland and Switzerland.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World#/media/File:Cold_War_alliances_mid-1975.svg
It's not clear why there's any
Looking at the Wikipedia article, it claims that Atlantis-2 “can already be
upgraded with current technology to 160Gbit/s”. Would be interesting why that
wasn’t already done on this 20-year-old cable – assuming that the underground
infrastructure (repeaters) are compatible with the newer
Colin Stanners (lists) wrote on 13/07/2020 14:41:
Looking at the Wikipedia article, it claims that Atlantis-2 “can
already be upgraded with current technology to 160Gbit/s”. Would be
interesting why that wasn’t already done on this 20-year-old cable –
assuming that the underground
On 13/Jul/20 16:23, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> 160gbit/sec split over a standard 80ch itu dwdm grid sounds like
> 2gbit/sec per channel (although there are more efficient options than
> the standard itu grid). This sounds like it's seriously not worth it
> for today's bandwidth requirements,
Fiscal and logistic reasons, would be my guess.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Hilliard"
To: "Mark Tinka"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020
> On 13 Jul 2020, at 17:17, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:01 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/Jul/20 17:19, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alternative routes before EllaLink comes into operation would be one of the
>>> Brazil-Africa cables (one to
18 matches
Mail list logo
