I'd had a similar thought/question, though keeping the geo diversity,
you manage the crawlers, and are making contact individually with these
sites from what you have stated (and so don't need a one size fit's all
list for public posting), so why not have a restricted subset of the
crawlers
On 7/28/21 17:09, Bill Woodcock wrote:
I was about to say something about us having equal success over 105 or so
countries, when I came to the realization that inviting quantitative
comparisons of manhood with Mark is the very definition of folly. :-)
Well, we are nowhere close to the
https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-cuts-self-off-from-global-internet-tests-defenses-rbc-2021-7
says "Russia disconnected itself from the rest of the internet, a test
of its new defense from cyber warfare, report says"
did this show up in bgp? e.g. rv/ris?
randy
*Tools + Resources for Industry Pros: IPv6 Website Validator*NANOG loves
sharing valuable tools and resources for our community of students and new
+ seasoned professionals.
*IPv6-test.com is a free service that checks your IPv6 and IPv4
connectivity and speed.* Diagnose connection problems,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:29 PM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-cuts-self-off-from-global-internet-tests-defenses-rbc-2021-7
> says "Russia disconnected itself from the rest of the internet, a test
> of its new defense from cyber warfare, report says"
>
Would that
>
> > On Jul 27, 2021, at 17:20, Vimal wrote:
> > Yes, this makes sense as the destination can be anywhere around the
> world, and that routing is asymmetric as others mentioned. However, if the
> destination service is "close" (in the routing metric sense) to the
> initiating host, anycast
Here is what I think would happen if you were to try this setup. Let's
assume you deployed in eu-west-2 (London) and eu-central-1 (Frankfurt). You
would find that you could successfully connect to a number of networks but
also that some of them would work from the "wrong" site. Eg. you would have
On 7/28/21 01:16, Daniel Corbe wrote:
This is interesting... I wonder whether Anycast will still have some failure
modes and break TCP connections if routing (configuration) were to change? I
checked the PDF linked by Bill Woodcock... while the methodology is the same
from 20y ago, would
we, verio, did anycast tcp streaming (hour long) of the tony awards in
about '96. solid.
randy
---
ra...@psg.com
`gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd ra...@psg.com`
signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 6:15 PM, Vimal wrote:
>
> AWS Global Accelerator gives anycast IPs that's good for ingress, but my
> original question was about having predictable egress IPs.
>
> It looks like having a few EIPs/a contiguous network block is the way to go.
Yes. Predictable and
Hello NANOG!
This is the CfP for our next DNSSEC & Security workshop @ ICANN72.
Jacques
Call for Participation -- ICANN DNSSEC and Security Workshop for ICANN72
Virtual Annual General Meeting
In cooperation with the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC),
we are planning a
Hi all, great replies. :) Let me clarify my initial question, and then
respond one by one:
My intention is to run a web-crawling service on a public cloud. This
service is geographically distributed, and therefore will run in multiple
regions around the world inside AWS... this means there will
AWS Global Accelerator gives anycast IPs that's good for ingress, but my
original question was about having predictable egress IPs.
It looks like having a few EIPs/a contiguous network block is the way to go.
Thanks!
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 4:30 PM Andras Toth wrote:
> Since you mentioned
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 3:21 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 7/28/21 01:16, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
>>> This is interesting... I wonder whether Anycast will still have some
>>> failure modes and break TCP connections if routing (configuration) were to
>>> change? I checked the PDF linked by Bill
On AWS once we purchase EIPs, they are allocated to our account and so we
can assign them to VPC NAT gateways. That's our current plan.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 4:16 PM Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
> > On Jul 27, 2021, at 17:20, Vimal wrote:
> >
> > Hi all, great replies. :) Let me clarify my initial
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 6:04 AM Vimal wrote:
> My intention is to run a web-crawling service on a public cloud. This service
> is geographically distributed, and therefore will run in multiple regions
> around the world inside AWS... this means there will be multiple AWS VPCs,
> each with their
16 matches
Mail list logo
