Are you contacting your LEO? Or is this so spammy just hit delete?
I feel like even spam chosen poorly comes with consequences.
On 10/19/21 8:29 AM, Travis Garrison wrote:
Yup, same here
Travis
*From:* NANOG *On
Behalf Of *Shawn L via NANOG
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2021 7:25 AM
*To:*
We received 2, and I heard from other operators that they had received it as
well. This is the second or third "threat" in a matter of a couple of weeks.
Seems like someone scraped some information from somewhere.
From: Travis Garrison
Sent: 10/19/21
You can try IPInsight.io.
We've been using it for years and its accuracy is better than MaxMind,
usually.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:28 PM Jeroen Massar via NANOG
wrote:
> On 2021-10-19 13:39, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> > Can anyone recommend a geo-location service with high city accuracy?
> >
Dell S4148 is based on Broadcom Maverick. S4048 is Trident2 (4048-T is
Trident2+) and S5248 is Trident3.
*From:* NANOG *On
Behalf Of *Drew Weaver
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2021 6:09 AM
*To:* 'nanog@nanog.org'
*Subject:* PowerSwitch S4100 (S4148-ON) chipset
Hello all,
I’ve been
Can anyone recommend a geo-location service with high city accuracy?
Maxmind, for most countries (broadband, which does move) is below 50%
accuracy (they claim 68% accuracy for USA cities):
https://www.maxmind.com/en/geoip2-city-accuracy-comparison?country==city=excluding
Thanks,
Hank
With OS10 you should be able to see it with:
system "sudo hshell -c 'show unit 0'"
i.e., from a S4128F-ON:
PLAT-SW-A-1# system "sudo hshell -c 'show unit 0'"
Unit 0 chip BCM56762_B0 (current)
driver BCM56560_B0 (apache)
(should be Trident 2+)
-Stefano
Il giorno mar 19 ott 2021 alle ore
What is the Broadcom Maverick chipset primarily used or designed for?
This seems like a not commonly used chip to me.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:27 AM Steven Shalita via NANOG
wrote:
>
>
>
> Dell S4148 is based on Broadcom Maverick. S4048 is Trident2 (4048-T is
> Trident2+) and S5248 is
Yes, it's from the operator of bytefend and they have been sending numerous
threatening emails for months.
You can check the statement from the victim Frantech from the link below:
https://frantech.ca/
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:34 PM Ray Bellis wrote:
>
>
> On 19/10/2021 13:29, Travis
It's a lower bandwidth Trident2+ with some different I/O options iirc. Same
featureset, but a mix of 10G and 25G serdes, targeted at like 48x10g+4x100G
boxes.
--
Tim
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:42 AM Colton Conor wrote:
> What is the Broadcom Maverick chipset primarily used or designed for?
>
On 2021-10-19 13:39, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Can anyone recommend a geo-location service with high city accuracy?
Maxmind, for most countries (broadband, which does move) is below 50%
accuracy (they claim 68% accuracy for USA cities):
Hello all,
I've been googling around trying to figure out which Broadcom silicon is in the
S4148-ON.
I haven't really been able to make much of a determination.
Does anyone know which chipset this is? Trident 1? Trident 2? Trident 3?
Thanks so much if anyone has already figured this out.
we received it as well
-Original Message-
From: "Matt Hoppes"
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:21am
To: "North American Network Operators' Group"
Subject: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
I've now heard from several operators - our selves included - about
getting an
I got one and I don’t have a datacenter. I’d better check my pockets….
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+milt=net2atlanta@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
Travis Garrison
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:29 AM
To: Matt Hoppes
Cc: Nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting the 'spam'
Honestly, for how 'spammy' that e-mail looked it's hard to believe
anyone took it seriously - but also, you never know.
On 10/19/21 12:51 PM, Jon Sands wrote:
The kid sending these (if it is Bytefend, who has a history/tweets of
bragging about attacking Frantech within the past month if I
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:20, Kain, Becki (.) wrote:
> The thing is, who is in office to care? Oh wait, guess equipment *is*
> important
>
>
For how long did you keep up with the evacuation of the equipment? :-)
I've now heard from several operators - our selves included - about
getting an e-mail bomb threat to our datacenters asking for $5,000 USD
or the "bomb will be detonated".
Is this being seen on a wide spread e-mail blast to the RIR contacts, or
am I just unlucky to know like 6 other data
Yup, same here
Travis
From: NANOG On Behalf Of
Shawn L via NANOG
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 7:25 AM
To: Matt Hoppes
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
we received it as well
-Original Message-
From: "Matt
https://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/Bufs/S4148.html
Seems to be BCM Maverick which is pretty close to a Trident2+ iirc..
--
Tim
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:14 AM Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I’ve been googling around trying to figure out which Broadcom silicon is
> in the S4148-ON.
>
>
>
On 19/10/2021 13:29, Travis Garrison wrote:
> Yup, same here
and here.
For now we're just ignoring it, but if anyone wants to quote us (ISC, a
DNS root server operator) in the event of law enforcement action please
let me know.
Ray
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, at 08:40, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> Are you contacting your LEO? Or is this so spammy just hit delete?
>
> I feel like even spam chosen poorly comes with consequences.
I hit delete after I saw Frantech had already reported it the FBI as per their
website.
Whoever this is seems
scammers and attackers aren't well known for their eloquent prose...
As soon as you decide to not take one thing seriously, how do you draw the
line? three spelling mistakes and the wrong tense of a verb means its fake?
I'd rather not play chicken with peoples' lives.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021,
I think that Dell is one of the few vendors using it AFAIK?
My understanding same class as T2+, with lower cost, but there are some
limitations.
https://www.broadcom.com/products/ethernet-connectivity/switching/strataxgs/bcm56760
I thought this was a good explanation:
The kid sending these (if it is Bytefend, who has a history/tweets of
bragging about attacking Frantech within the past month if I understand
correctly) is going to be looking at serious jail time given the amount of
evacuations he's caused already. A brief list:
>
> Vs. an ISP that is causing the problem or trying to run a protection
> racket against content providers, I think it wouldn’t be hard for the
> content
> provider to supply appropriate messaging inserted at the front end of
> playback to explain the situation to their mutual customers. Instead
Matt Hoppes wrote:
I've now heard from several operators - our selves included - about
getting an e-mail bomb threat to our datacenters asking for $5,000 USD
or the "bomb will be detonated".
Is this being seen on a wide spread e-mail blast to the RIR contacts,
or am I just unlucky to know
Hi all,
Do you use Internet monitoring and measurements (e.g., RIPEstat, RIPE
RIS/Atlas, RouteViews, bgp.he.net, etc.) for your operations? What are your
use cases?
We (researchers) are trying to identify limitations and biases of the
Internet monitoring infrastructure, and come up with ideas to
The thing is, who is in office to care? Oh wait, guess equipment *is* important
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Sadiq Saif
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:11 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
WARNING: This message originated
We have a distinct abuse address (not just abuse@) and that is where
the messages were sent.
We didn't receive the bomb threat ones. We only received the (somewhat
more amusing) messages entitled "Your network has been PWNED" and
"Fuck you".
The situation loses its humor entirely with the
28 matches
Mail list logo
