Combined responses to save bandwidth and hassle (and number of times you
have to press 'd'):
--
Just because it's behind NAT, does not mean it's unreahcable from the
internet:
Okay, so exactly how many times do you think we have to say in this thread
that by NAT/PAT, we mean NAT/PAT as
On 5/06/2007, at 9:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posit that a screen door does not provide any security.
Any is too strong a word. For people living in an area with
malaria-carrying mosquitoes, that screen door may be more important
for
security than a solid
On 6/4/07, David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posit that a screen door does not provide any security. A lock and
deadbolt provide some security. NAT/PAT is a screen door.
This is a fine piece of rhetoric, but it's manifestly false and seriously
misleading.
Hi, David
I think the
On 6/5/07, David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Combined responses to save bandwidth and hassle (and number of times you
have to press 'd'):
--
Just because it's behind NAT, does not mean it's unreahcable from the
internet:
Okay, so exactly how many times do you think we have to say in
fellow NANOGers,
are there live webcasts of NANOG presentations and talks?
if so, where can I point my media player to?
Abraços,
Marlon Borba, CISSP, APC DataCenter Associate
Técnico Judiciário - Segurança da Informação
TRF 3 Região
(11) 3012-1683
--
Dont just sit there and think it does not
On 5-Jun-2007, at 12:30, MARLON BORBA wrote:
are there live webcasts of NANOG presentations and talks?
if so, where can I point my media player to?
For the benefit of anybody else who was wondering (assuming someone
already gave you an answer in private mail), look here:
On 6/5/07, Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5-Jun-2007, at 12:30, MARLON BORBA wrote:
Are there live webcasts of NANOG presentations and talks?
if so, where can I point my media player to?
For the benefit of anybody else who was wondering (assuming someone
already gave you an answer in
On Monday 04 June 2007 18:06, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:41 PM, David Schwartz wrote:
On Jun 4, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Jim Shankland wrote:
Owen DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's no security gain from not having real IPs on machines.
Any belief that there is results from
8 matches
Mail list logo
