-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This question is part reality, part surreality.
Let me ask you this: What would you do when you have alerted
(via abuse@ contacts) a notable ISP in the U.S. (not a tier one,
and not just one of them) about KNOWN, VERIFIABLE, and RECURRING
criminal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not intentionally trying to be retarded, but I've received
an enormous number of private responses.
Many thanks.
It is odd, however, why folks felt the need to reply privately,
and although I'm glad you did reply, it is somewhat of a statement,
in
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Paul Ferguson wrote:
The most obvious answer is: Gather evidence, contact law
enforcement.
Other than being provactively phrased, its often the same reason:
e.g. what about anti-virus vendors who turn a blind eye to criminal
activity by poor detection to new/old
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:00:46 GMT
Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not intentionally trying to be retarded, but I've received
an enormous number of private responses.
[...]
This question is part reality, part surreality.
Let me ask you this: What would you do when you have alerted
I am a smug Telcove weenie (customer) who has been watching the
integration of Telcove into the L3 Borg with satisfaction, as network
connectivity has gotten better and even their billing system seems to
be slowly improving over time.
Meanwhile have come to expect that almost any Level3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what case prompted Ferg to post his message to NANOG, but I
I didn't specifically cite a particular case -- and won't -- but
simply wanted to solicit some opinions from folks who may have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Michael Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We did exactly that with a similar incident and the local FBI Cyber
Crimes folks told us that they couldn't help us because they were
entirely dedicated to potential terrorist activities. So, I would
7 matches
Mail list logo