On 30 Jul 2008, at 03:26, James Pleger wrote:
Something you might want to look into is traffic aggregation with a
switch or hub. You can buy an Allied Telesyn switch and basically turn
it into a hub by disabling switchport learning. Just an idea.
Never try to aggregate multiple TAPs with a
On Jul 29, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Darryl Dunkin wrote:
Hubs sure are fun...
This might be a stupid question, but where can one get small hubs
these days? All of the common commodity (eg: 4 port Netgear) hubs
these days are actually switches.
What I am looking for is:
Small enough to live
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Darryl Dunkin wrote:
Hubs sure are fun...
This might be a stupid question, but where can one get small hubs these
days? All of the common commodity (eg: 4 port Netgear) hubs these
days
Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Darryl Dunkin wrote:
Hubs sure are fun...
This might be a stupid question, but where can one get small hubs these
days? All of the common commodity (eg: 4 port Netgear) hubs these
days are actually switches.
True enough. For those
hat org=NANOG program committee role=chair
An updated agenda for NANOG44 has been posted at:
http://nanog.org/mtg-0810/agenda.html
you might notice that this NANOG features:
* Keynote by Vint Cerf of Google
* More tutorials than you can shake a stick at
* A
The Cisco 8 port 10/100/1000 switch (WS-C2960G-8TC-L) supports RSPAN which
would allow you to tap all the ports even though it's a switch. It's about
$750, so it's not a cheap option, but it's not outrageous either. It's the
right size also.
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix. Although
I doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a victory, but rather a loss.
Note: HD has not been compromised.
Gadi.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:46:49 -0700
From: Dragos Ruiu
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, John A. Kilpatrick wrote:
We've deployed a bunch taps in our network and now we need a platform on
which to capture the data. Our bandwidth is currently pretty low but I've
got 8 links to tap, which means I need 16 ports. Has anyone done any
research on doing accurate
Jon Kibler wrote:
Hubs are still available that are REAL hubs. I got 4 netgears about a
year ago and they are still available.
However, there is a problem with your specification: No hub (that I am
aware of) can do 1Gbps. All hubs are 10/100 AFAIK.
Grand Junction made a gigabit Ethernet
Hello,
we are looking into providing power for 'legacy' equipment in a data
center that is exclusively giving us -48V DC power. The most recent
thread on this list was about -48V DC modems but in our case I am rather
looking into inverting on the order of 4 kW per rack from the supplied DC
into
On Jul 31, 2008, at 5:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out Endace cards, that will let you do line rate gig e or
better and has native libpcap interface.
I believe Endace also have a productized box containing their capture
cards (NinjaProbe); it can be used to capture packets, and
Unipower out of florida.. They can provide scalable inverters for 120
and 208/240. Modular N+1 setups and very flexible..
We have a large 200amp 120vac setup from them. I'd recommend letting
your electrician build a parallel setup instead of relying on their
modules, however...
On 7/30/08,
If you do invert, don't forget the cooling budget. Inverters run HOT!
-Original Message-
From: Tim Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 5:36 PM
To: Andreas Ott; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: big DC -48V to AC inverters
Unipower out of florida.. They
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix. Although I
doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a victory, but rather a loss.
Note: HD has not been compromised.
Well so if any of you uses an iphone to
Not so quick. Privacy policy?
-M
On 7/30/08, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix. Although
I
doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a
Between a potential problem with privacy, and an actual problem with
having my sessions redirected to the RBN, I'll take the privacy risk.
YMMV.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:13 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian;
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
Between a potential problem with privacy, and an actual problem with
having my sessions redirected to the RBN, I'll take the privacy risk.
YMMV.
Depends on your priorities--and that of whoever owns the phone. You, or
your employer.
Gadi.
If you don't mind OpenDNS proxying all your Google searches, sure.
http://blog.metasploit.com/2008/07/on-dns-attacks-in-wild-and-journalistic.html
Personally, I would never use OpenDNS. Tactics like that are not particularly
acceptable in my book, well-meaning or not. Not, however, trying
I can point it to a colo'd resolver I have elsewhere - but opendns is
rather more redundant. Yes I know what else it does re advertising
and such, but I dont do any sensitive work related stuff through those
resolvers anyway.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Skywing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If
Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Darryl Dunkin wrote:
Hubs sure are fun...
This might be a stupid question, but where can one get small hubs
these days? All of the common commodity (eg: 4 port Netgear) hubs
these days are actually switches.
What I am looking for is:
20 matches
Mail list logo
