When the server sends TCP traffic for that same connection back to
host A,
it needs to pick one of the N routers, in other words, it needs to
pick an
outbound interface from its N interfaces.
...
The problem is that some routers are better than other routers in
the
sense that they are
Hi all.
I have several of these units deployed, they are all running fine, but I
am looking for information about them, specifically SNMP related.
Our Alcatel contacts have given us a collection of MIBs, from which I cant
really get anything useful out of the radios. Other than that they dont
Tom Storey wrote:
Hi all.
I have several of these units deployed, they are all running fine, but I
am looking for information about them, specifically SNMP related.
Our Alcatel contacts have given us a collection of MIBs, from which I cant
really get anything useful out of the radios.
Hi,
We are seeing traffic getting dropped between our Cogent and Sprint
connect DC's. One of them is getting shutdown, so we just have a Cogent
link there :| Anyone seeing anything similar?
From: 91.102.40.18
traceroute to ops1.scc.rnmd.net (208.91.188.136), 30 hops max, 38 byte
packets
1
No apparent problems from Cogent in Northern Virginia :
tme$ traceroute ops1.scc.rnmd.net
traceroute to ops1.scc.rnmd.net (208.91.188.136), 64 hops max, 40 byte
packets
1 dmz-mct2 (63.105.122.1) 0.754 ms 0.278 ms 0.485 ms
2 gi0-7.na21.b002176-1.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (38.99.206.153)
I'm seeing issues with traceroutes dying at Sprint in London, too.
From our site here in the UK (transit from NTL Telewest Business) I
can't reach cisco.com (but I know cisco.com is up - I can reach it
from elsewhere). Apparently customers of XS4ALL in the Netherlands
are seeing similar
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 06:02:37AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
No apparent problems from Cogent in Northern Virginia :
Fine from Cogent in DC. Not so fine from Cogent in the Netherlands.
traceroute to ops1.scc.rnmd.net (208.91.188.136), 64 hops max, 40 byte
packets
1 38.105.91.2
BGP Update Report
Interval: 18-Aug-08 -to- 18-Sep-08 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9583 301731 3.8% 226.5 -- SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited
2 - AS1803 126042 1.6%
FWIW, the Sprint routing issues we were seeing seem to have been
resolved now, AFAICS.
-roy
Can you post a couple of IP's ? We're out of Level(3) Detroit node and
don't see anything towards Disney.com etc
Paul
-Original Message-
From: James Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 8:01 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Level(3) Issues
Is anyone
No issues Tampa to San Fran.
Robert D. Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Network Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone
CNS - Network Services 352-392-2061 CNS Receptionist
University of Florida 352-392-9440 FAX
Florida Lambda Rail 352-294-3571 FLR NOC
Hi All,
Some of you might have heard about or suffered a listing on
virbl.bit.nl. Virbl is a dns-list with IP's of which we (BIT) or one of
the contributors [1] have received a email with a virus.
We will list an IP after it has sent two virus-emails to one of our
sources. We will remember that
Does anyone have more info as to what Level3 changed last night during
their maintenace window?
Also I am going through either WashDC or Atlanta it seems, on most
traceroutes.
Here is a weird traceroute from this morning (note the first 4 traces):
traceroute cwlabs.com (used as an example)
Since postmaster@ is bouncing...
(If you are not a RIM employee, you can stop reading now)
Due to yahoo's DNS servers deciding to say, this morning, that my MX records
point to email.vicimarketing.com.115, in that popular new .115 gTLD... I
moved the zone service inhouse. In the process, the
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Tom Storey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have several of these units deployed, they are all running fine, but I
am looking for information about them, specifically SNMP related.
Our Alcatel contacts have given us a collection of MIBs, from which I cant
really get
Stephen Sprunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Azinger, Marla wrote:
I use RWHOIS for proof of who we assign and allocate address space to.
How is _you_ showing information in an RWHOIS server that _you_
control in any way proving that the holder of a address block is
authorizing _you_ to
17 matches
Mail list logo
