RE: Fwd: cnn.com - Homeland Security seeks cyber counterattacksystem(Einstein 3.0)

2008-10-08 Thread Tomas L. Byrnes
People, and manage them appropriately. -Original Message- From: Sean Donelan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Fwd: cnn.com - Homeland Security seeks cyber counterattacksystem(Einstein 3.0) On Tue,

Re: Some odd harvesting going on?

2008-10-08 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:16:22PM -0400, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: To prove that your message was sent by a human and not a computer, please visit the URL below and type in the alphanumeric text you will see in the image. You will be asked to do this only once for this recipient. This

Re: Nanog 44 Hockey Event -- Last Call

2008-10-08 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
Just no self-styled hockey moms, please...

Re: NANOG 44 (Los Angeles): ISP Security BOF

2008-10-08 Thread Warren Kumari
Hi all, Well, Esthost has decided that they no longer wish to present their side of the story, and so their talk has been removed from the agenda :-) This also means that that the more, erm, operational talks have been lengthened and so won't feel quite as rushed... The revised agenda

Re: Some odd harvesting going on?

2008-10-08 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:21:22 -0400 Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This doesn't look to me like phishing (although I can see the similarities); it looks like yet another severely clueless site engaged in challenge-response spamming. (C-R has long since been not only completely

Re: Nanog 44 Hockey Event -- Last Call

2008-10-08 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 09:06, Steven M. Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just no self-styled hockey moms, please... You Maverick you. ;-) -Jim P.

UltraDNS mail admin around?

2008-10-08 Thread Andrey Gordon
I'm getting bombarded by these Received: from 80.224.33.155.static.user.ono.com ([80.224.33.155])by mxb2eqsj.ultradns.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)id 1J7YZc-0007qU-4ifor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:53:36 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Handbags [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: UltraDNS mail admin around?

2008-10-08 Thread Randy Bush
Andrey Gordon wrote: I'm getting bombarded by these Received: from 80.224.33.155.static.user.ono.com ([80.224.33.155])by mxb2eqsj.ultradns.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)id 1J7YZc-0007qU-4ifor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:53:36 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From:

Re: UltraDNS mail admin around?

2008-10-08 Thread Randy Bush
Randy Bush wrote: Andrey Gordon wrote: I'm getting bombarded by these Received: from 80.224.33.155.static.user.ono.com ([80.224.33.155])by mxb2eqsj.ultradns.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)id 1J7YZc-0007qU-4ifor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:53:36 + Message-ID: [EMAIL

Re: UltraDNS mail admin around?

2008-10-08 Thread Chris Lewis
Randy Bush wrote: Randy Bush wrote: Andrey Gordon wrote: I'm getting bombarded by these Received: from 80.224.33.155.static.user.ono.com ([80.224.33.155])by mxb2eqsj.ultradns.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)id 1J7YZc-0007qU-4ifor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:53:36 +

Re: UltraDNS mail admin around?

2008-10-08 Thread Andrey Gordon
we are actually not using ultraDNS for email. DNS only. It does awfully close to some local host spamming. tx for the help to y'all - Andrey Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rodney Joffe wrote: I suspect that Andrey/his

Re: Nanog 44 Hockey Event -- Last Call

2008-10-08 Thread kris foster
On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:20 PM, Ralph E. Whitmore, III wrote: For those that are attending NANOG 44 and interested in catching the: Hi Everyone A new list has been created for NANOG 44 attendees called nanog- attendee. You are automatically joined to this list if you registered for the

Re: OK, who's the idiot using tcwireless.us?

2008-10-08 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:05:20 PDT, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE said: I agree with Howard here, I don't think this is a mis-configuration, but a harvest attempt. The mailserver is in different messages, and I can't see how that could get misconfigured in a honest validation server. Turns