* Naveen Nathan:
Of the several solutions presented the two that seem to be simple to
implement and guarantee traffic were conditional route advertisements
or using more specific routes.
One thing you need to consider is what happens if your AS is split.
In this case, traffic will probably
On Dec 31, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Naveen Nathan wrote:
Also they didn't want to subnet the space for the failover
location, so it's all or nothing style routing.
Have they considered doing GSLB via DNS rather than playing routing
games? Seems as if it might answer better, be less complex,
If an IBGP link is possible then you could automate this with the proper
attributes. Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:08:32 + From: nav...@calpop.com
To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Failover solution using BGP Hi, I would
appreciate insight and experience for the following situation. I have a
* Roland Dobbins:
Have they considered doing GSLB via DNS rather than playing routing
games? Seems as if it might answer better, be less complex, et. al.
I suspect they want to solve the split brain problem, which would
explain the strong, non-negotiable requirement of traffic flow to only
On Dec 31, 2008, at 11:36 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
DNS tweaks won't help with that (and to be honest, BGP doesn't
address it, either).
After all, there ought to be an internal line of communication as well
as the external one, and the availability probes can be set up with
logic such
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Chris Ely c...@internap.com wrote:
Conditional advertisements might be what you're looking for:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094309.shtml
I did something just like this recently. Apologies if this is
Just a reminder that there's a leap second tonight.
Last time I watched for what happened on 01/01/2006, there was a
little bit of chaos: http://markmail.org/message/cpoj3jw5onzhhjkr?q=%22kevin+day%22+leap+second+reminder+nanogpage=1refer=cnkxb3iv7sls5axu
I've been told that some of the
INTERNATIONAL EARTH ROTATION AND REFERENCE SYSTEMS SERVICE (IERS)
SERVICE INTERNATIONAL DE LA ROTATION TERRESTRE ET DES SYSTEMES DE REFERENCE
SERVICE DE LA ROTATION TERRESTRE
OBSERVATOIRE DE PARIS
61, Av. de l'Observatoire 75014 PARIS (France)
Tel.
Since leap seconds apply to UTC, won't the leap second be in about 22
minutes?
-jasper
On 1/01/2009, at 11:41 AM, Kevin Day wrote:
Just a reminder that there's a leap second tonight.
Last time I watched for what happened on 01/01/2006, there was a
little bit of chaos:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 04:41:39PM -0600, Kevin Day wrote:
I've been told that some of the causes of these problems are fixed on
any reasonably recent ntp distribution, but just in case, you might
wanna keep an eye out if you're seeing any weirdness. The worst damage
I'd heard from
From: Kevin Day toa...@dragondata.com
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:41:39 -0600
Just a reminder that there's a leap second tonight.
Last time I watched for what happened on 01/01/2006, there was a
little bit of chaos:
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 00:59:58 CET 2009
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 00:59:59 CET 2009
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 00:59:60 CET 2009
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 CET 2009
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 01:00:01 CET 2009
bash-2.05b#
-P
At which point my Solaris 10 v490's reboot in unison, lovely.
Anyone else see anything interesting?
-wil
On Dec 31, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Peter Lothberg wrote:
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 00:59:58 CET 2009
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 00:59:59 CET 2009
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 00:59:60 CET
My Solaris 10 boxes are all happy (and did not reboot). I monitor NTP
on a number
of devices, including one router. The router was off by one second for
a while, but
is OK after an hour. Everything else was fine immediately.
In 2005, our CDMA clock got the leap second between 15:08 and 15:38
EST
It looks like clepsydra hasn't been updated:
address ref clock st when poll reach delay offsetdisp
-~192.5.41.40 .USNO.1 194 1024 37741.15.1938.2
-~130.207.244.240 .GPS. 168 1024 37723.1 11.09 1.3
~127.127.7.1
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:53:57 -0800
Wil Schultz wschu...@bsdboy.com wrote:
At which point my Solaris 10 v490's reboot in unison, lovely.
Solaris? Or ZuneOS? (See
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/01/technology/personaltech/01zune.html)
--Steve Bellovin,
17 matches
Mail list logo
