I've been seeing some odd behavior today with some of the servers that
respond to smtp.comcast.net on port 587. Some, but not all, of the
servers are presenting self-signed certs, causing my own server to balk
at making a connection. (The Organization is RTFM, Inc. -- it'd be funny
if mail wasn
I hesitate to put my customers in "the Lagrange point between clueless and
lazy" because they're SMBs doing what 99% of the other SMBs out there do. I
have some customers who are in the hub in a multi-site VPN network and
renumbering would be very painful.
While Renumbering has all the positiv
We've detected a large drop in the IPv4 multicast prefix count over the
past few days. Anybody know what's going on?
Antonio Querubin
whois: AQ7-ARIN
Respected AllI would like to discuss some of the questions related to BGP
Security which might be quite helpful in my research.1.What are you using now
for BGP Security problems like Prefix hijacking,Path Spoofing,etc?2.What you
would be looking for in any BGP Security Solution?3.Are solutions l
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Murphy, Jay, DOH
wrote:
> In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more efficient, packet
> or cell? ...
> Trying to make a decision on the transport mode for cost, delay, jitter, ROI,
> etcetera.
It really depends on what your applications are.
I'
Hello John -
Radiator includes both RADIUS and TACACS+ clients (written in Perl).
www.open.com.au/radiator
regards
Hugh
On 16 Jan 2009, at 02:15, John Souvestre wrote:
Hi all.
Does anyone have any recommendations for Radius and Tacacs+ clients
(not
servers) to run on Linux and
--On torsdag, torsdag 15 jan 2009 15.11.48 -0500 William Herrin
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Måns Nilsson
> wrote:
>> from operational standpoint renumbering is not that bad.
>
> Måns,
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-01.t
> xt provides 24 p
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> For the first time we have our own ARIN-assigned netblocks that we can now
> split out and divide to our customers.
>
> What's the best approach to handing out /30's, /29's, etc. that is efficient
> as possible but allows for customers to expan
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:56:11 MST, "Murphy, Jay, DOH" said:
> In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more efficient, packet
> or cell?
In my humble opinion, if you care about actual in-the-field efficiency as
opposed to theoretical or in-the-lab results, I think you'll find that there
Does anyone have any recommendations for Radius and Tacacs+ clients (not
servers) to run on Linux and Windows?
Steven Fischer gave you a good pointer to freeradius
for tacacs, look at http://shrubbery.net/tac_plus/
randy
take a look at this for your Linux requirements:
http://freeradius.org/pam_radius_auth/
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:15 AM, John Souvestre wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Does anyone have any recommendations for Radius and Tacacs+ clients (not
> servers) to run on Linux and Windows?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
Hi all.
Does anyone have any recommendations for Radius and Tacacs+ clients (not
servers) to run on Linux and Windows?
Thanks,
John
John Souvestre - Integrated Data Systems - (504) 355-0609
Here's a question that's been bugging me the whole thread, and it's a
bit of a newbie one. How is this different than someone faking SMTP
headers to make it seem like an email came from my domain when it
didn't? I'm talking in terms of morals, obviously; I understand the
technique is different.
On
On Jan 15, 2009, at 3:54 AM, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 14 Jan 2009, at 16:06, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Simon Lockhart wrote:
(Yes, I'm in the minority that thinks that Randy hasn't done
anything bad)
Nah, I agree with Randy's experiment too. People should protect
their networks better and this is
On 2009-01-14, at 15:56, Murphy, Jay, DOH wrote:
In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more efficient,
packet or cell?
When you say "transmission method" are you just interested in packet/
cell forwarding, or are you also including the effort involved in
segmentation and re
On Jan 14, 2009, at 6:22 PM, kris foster wrote:
On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Michienne Dixon wrote:
Well, if you really want to pick knits you are welcome to. If I
meant
prepending, I would have said that. The example that I listed was
setting up a router, advertising the ASNs listed and
--On onsdag, onsdag 14 jan 2009 10.30.18 -0600 Frank Bulk
wrote:
> But perhaps the BCP is to make the customer renumber, in which case I'm
> making things more complicated than they need to be.
Most customers with PA space (which is what you are giving them) are quite
used to renumbering. If not
On 14 Jan 2009, at 16:06, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Simon Lockhart wrote:
(Yes, I'm in the minority that thinks that Randy hasn't done
anything bad)
Nah, I agree with Randy's experiment too. People should protect
their networks better and this is clearly showing that there are a
lot of vulnera
18 matches
Mail list logo
