As I gather, there is a mix of answers, ranging from building the resources
according to requirements and HOPE for the best to use of arguably
sophisticated tools and perhaps sharing the results with the legal
department.
I would be particularly interested in hearing the service providers'
Hi Guys,
If anyone can tell me how to resolve this issue there's a strong possibility
of a fedex'd beer.
Using Putty or any other ssh/telnet terminal I find that Ctrl+Shift+6 then X
(on a cisco) works only sometimes after beating your keyboard multiple times
with a hammer, has anyone else
Re Bruce,
br...@yoafrica.com (Bruce Grobler) wrote:
Using Putty or any other ssh/telnet terminal I find that Ctrl+Shift+6 then X
(on a cisco) works only sometimes after beating your keyboard multiple times
with a hammer, has anyone else come across or had a solution to this problem
?
I
Bruce,
I have that problem using any terminal program (I use SecureCRT).. I have to
bang the command like 10-20 times for the device to recognize it. Kind of wished
CTRL-C or something worked better and actually worked well.
Shon Elliott
Senior Network Engineer
unWired Broadband, Inc.
Bruce
Ye, exact same things happens for me, then after it decides to execute it
you have a nice long line of 6x6x66x6x666x6, tried the Ctrl+6 no such
luck...
-Original Message-
From: Shon Elliott [mailto:s...@unwiredbb.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:48 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Hi,
Yep does that all the time the worst is on a traceroute where it seems you need
to wait for the end of line to send the ctrl+shift+6.
Workaround on cisco:
Line con 0
Escape-character 3
Line vty 0 4
Escape-character 3
Whith this you can just CTRL+C
Cheers,
Michel Moriniaux
-Message
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Shon Elliott s...@unwiredbb.com wrote:
I have that problem using any terminal program (I use SecureCRT).. I have to
bang the command like 10-20 times for the device to recognize it. Kind of
wished
CTRL-C or something worked better and actually worked well.
I
Just configure a different escape character with terminal escape x. For
example, term esc 3 will make Ctrl/C the escape character (and Ctrl/C+X
the escape sequence). Ctrl/^ is somewhat hard to get on some terminal
emulators :)
Ivan
If anyone can tell me how to resolve this issue there's a
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Danny McPherson wrote:
On Feb 22, 2009, at 10:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Paul Wall pauldotw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
What was that story with an African routes some
Oh wow, that worked like a charm Thanks a bunch!!! :D
-Original Message-
From: Moriniaux Michel [mailto:mmorini...@prosodie.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:18 AM
To: Bruce Grobler; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X
Hi,
Yep does that all the time the worst is
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:28:17 +0200
Bruce Grobler br...@yoafrica.com wrote:
Oh wow, that worked like a charm Thanks a bunch!!! :D
What, nobody's using vt220s anymore?
(Almost bought one (or rather a vt420) off ebay for fun to plug in to
one of our 2500 terminal servers for the machine
Hi
Can you share your experience what is fastest Gig switch?
I see there is CEF feature in cisco.
ls it big different when i enable it in switch vs other switch?
ls there any problem?
Thank you
Can you elaborate a bit on your question? The fastest Gig switches
can do 1GB full speed on the port. There are many that can do that.
Do you have a particular density you need to do full speed with? Any
particular features? Are you looking at any particular models now, in
others words
In a Former Life we used Comcast for transport for a school corporation.
In the 3 years we used them we have 10 minutes of unscheduled downtime.
Justin
http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=1pageid=28pagename=Sci-Tech
--
mailto:n...@layer3arts.com //
GoogleTalk: nrauhau...@gmail.com
IM: nealrauhauser
Very nice. But note that our group's name is North American Network
Operators' Group (not Operations).
--
Tony Rall
Whoops - will have to go dig and see if that's my error or the editors.
They've wound it up a bit over my reporting ... the audience there is
educated but non-technical.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Tony Rall tr...@almaden.ibm.com wrote:
Very nice. But note that our group's name is
In a level2 only ISIS network (not using multiple areas due to MPLS
limitations), is there a better method for handling aggregate routes
than creating an aggregate and redistributing it into ISIS for each
router? Primarily Cisco/Juniper based. Cisco I believe has an aggregate
option in ISIS
FWIW Ive rarely had a problem breaking out of ping/traceroute/etc on a Cisco.
I have found that Shift-Ctrl, then a very very small delay and 6 (while
still holding down Shift-Ctrl) works like a charm every time.
Maybe the terminals I use are just more friendly towards that sort of key
sequence
On 23/02/2009 23:02, Tom Storey wrote:
Though the only thing it doesnt seem to help with is when you have no DNS
servers configured and mistype configt, or some other command that
doesnt exist and it tries to resolve it through broadcast several times.
Ive found its futile to try and get out of
'No ip domain lookup' will solve your problem instance below. Eg dns resolution
attempt on typos.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Storey t...@snnap.net
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:32:28
To: Bruce Groblerbr...@yoafrica.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X
FWIW Ive
Erm, what does that have to do with DNS lookups? :-)
line con 0
transport preferred none
line vty 0 15
transport preferred none
Nick
'No ip domain lookup' will solve your problem instance below. Eg dns
True, but only really useful until you configure the device and it can
reach a DNS server, at which point you lose the ability to resolve any
hostname, but would be very handy in a lab where DNS is never likely to
exist I must
On 23/02/2009 23:51, Tom Storey wrote:
Erm, what does that have to do with DNS lookups? :-)
Nothing at all, except that it stops this behaviour:
... when you have no DNS
servers configured and mistype configt, or some other command that
doesnt exist and it tries to resolve it through
Is anyone else seeing a high rejection rate from charter.net email clients?
Yup, I knew that, sorry.
Ryan Rawdon wrote:
You may want to try the mailop mailing list, which was created to try
and shift mail operations traffic volume from NANOG: http://www.mailop.org/
Good luck with your issue,
Ryan
John Martinez wrote:
Is anyone else seeing a high rejection rate
Anybody actually on that list? Most of the serious mailops work is on
some other, entirely different lists.
And why do people have to think nanog is solely for packet pushing
related ops? Email is operational, and its often the first ops
failure that your users notice, right after the ones that
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Anybody actually on that list? Most of the serious mailops work is on
some other, entirely different lists.
I followed up to John's message there. We're currently seeing
intermittent timeouts when connecting TCP/25 on ib1.charter.net as well
as timeouts after the
28 matches
Mail list logo
