Fellow NANOG-ers.
I am very happy eith the recent revival of traffic on NANOG on relevant
subjects, as I am sure we all are. My email is about traffic we don't
see and unless I am missing something, don't know gets filtered. due to
what I believe is very heavy-handed moderation by the admin
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
I am very happy eith the recent revival of traffic on NANOG on relevant
subjects, as I am sure we all are. My email is about traffic we don't
see and unless I am missing something, don't know gets filtered. due to
what I
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
I am very happy eith the recent revival of traffic on NANOG on relevant
subjects, as I am sure we all are. My email is about traffic we don't
Christopher Morrow wrote:
do you have a link to this thread? (I don't actually see it in my box,
so I fear I missed it for other reasons)
oops, sorry... I did get the original message + ~6 followups. I just
hadn't read them :(
The follow-ups on-list were not extremely operational, the
Joe Provo wrote:
Gadi,
Some valid points are raised. While additional discussion from
interested folks here is encouraged, suffice to say that the topic
will be on the SC call tomorrow, as we are the folks whom receive
escalation appeals of MLC actions.
Thank you Joe. I appreciate your
i apologize if this has been discussed...searching mboned/nanog/ietf/arin/etc
archives doesn't give me the clarification i hoped for.
is there a defined method to request eGLOP space? does anyone really care what
people use internally for mcast? i see mr. eubanks submitted a proposal back
in
Hi all,
Anybody here have experience shipping pre-built cabinets, with ~20U of
routers and servers installed, connected and tested, to remote sites
for deployment?
The idea is to increase the consistency of the deployments by having
them all built in one place by the same set of people,
Joe asked today:
Do I even need to spend time wondering about shock-tolerant cabinets,
or should I instead be concentrating on finding the right company to
wrap the cabinets for shipping, and to do the shipping itself?
Joe, after having done a lot of this I found it was very
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Joe Abley wrote:
We've located a few vendors who sell shock-tolerant cabinets, but they're
expensive and seem to me to be aimed at people who need to ship a set of
equipment frequently (e.g. to support movie shoots, outside broadcasts, etc),
rather than people who want to
On Monday 06 April 2009 14:46:35 Joe Abley wrote:
Anybody here have experience shipping pre-built cabinets, with ~20U of
routers and servers installed, connected and tested, to remote sites
for deployment?
[snip]
Do I even need to spend time wondering about shock-tolerant cabinets,
or should
[Sent to multiple lists; apologies for the duplicates]
On behalf of the North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) and the
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN), I would like to take this
opportunity to draw your attention to the 2009 Postel Network Operator's
Scholarship.
The
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Joe Abley wrote:
Anybody here have experience shipping pre-built cabinets, with ~20U of
routers and servers installed, connected and tested, to remote sites for
deployment?
The idea is to increase the consistency of the deployments by having them all
built in one place
In a message written on Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:46:35PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
Anybody here have experience shipping pre-built cabinets, with ~20U of
routers and servers installed, connected and tested, to remote sites
for deployment?
shipping, no, moving yes.
In past lives I've hired
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Joe Abley wrote:
Anybody here have experience shipping pre-built cabinets, with ~20U
of routers and servers installed, connected and tested, to remote
sites for deployment?
How tall are the doors in the destination datacenter?
How much weight can be rolled over the
I know some VAR's (CDW for example) will do racking/shipping from their
facility. In the option we explored, they offered to allow us to rack gear
ourselves or rack it themselves. They also were amenable to a VPN setup so
we could get in via console and KVM's.
They claimed to ship pre-built
I have some experience with this, and, in general, if you have the
option,
it's best to ship the equipment and racks separately in their original
manufacturer's packaging.
If you don't have that option, use a moving company with a specialty
(or specialty department) that does electronics
Joe Abley wrote:
Hi all,
Anybody here have experience shipping pre-built cabinets, with ~20U of
routers and servers installed, connected and tested, to remote sites for
deployment?
Not pre built cabinets, but I have shipped/received over $1,000,000.00
worth of gear
Hi Ryan,
On 06/04/2009 10:51, Ryan Landry ryan.lan...@telus.com wrote:
i apologize if this has been discussed...searching mboned/nanog/ietf/arin/etc
archives doesn't give me the clarification i hoped for.
is there a defined method to request eGLOP space? does anyone really care
what
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Peter Beckman wrote:
Probably be cheaper to get shock-tolerant packing crates and use normal
cabinets. You'll probably learn a few hard lessons the first time around
-- should have put in styrofoam wedges between servers, or the rackmounts
you
Owen DeLong wrote:
(1)moment is the length (from the center of the rack) to the center
of mass of the object multiplied by the mass of the object.
If you change the datum to the bottom of the rack, the CG calculation is
easier.
Just remember that 6lbs/gallon for 100LL is close enough.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
Hi all,
Anybody here have experience shipping pre-built cabinets, with ~20U of
routers and servers installed, connected and tested, to remote sites for
deployment?
I've done this in the past and most recently evaluated it
mar...@theicelandguy.com (Martin Hannigan) wrote:
1. as-builts designated by the RU
2. physical layer wiring diagram
3. cable run list (optical, fiber, connector type, pots)
4. Bill of materials down to the rack mount kit screws
5. cut view, detailing cabinet details _from the datacenter_.
Hergo (1) did this for me a few times, they are out of ny though, and ship
freight only.
YMMV
1 www.hergo.com
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Elmar K. Bins e...@4ever.de wrote:
mar...@theicelandguy.com (Martin Hannigan) wrote:
1. as-builts designated by the RU
2. physical layer wiring diagram
3. cable run list (optical, fiber, connector type, pots)
4. Bill of materials down to the rack mount
snip
Sending that one full rack has proven successful for us, but that
was specialists with some experience, and it was road only. Every
time I see suitcases being thrown around in airports...well...
Baggage handlers have nothing on FedEX folks. They literally hurl
packages into the truck
25 matches
Mail list logo
