Erik Fichtner wrote:
And yet, all upgrades can be postponed with the right... motivation.
Hmmm, you do know that motivation may have strictly been, Your
maintenance corresponds with a major event, can you put it off for a day?
The maintenance in question has obviously been marked
What's interesting is that the !NANOG part of the universe presumes
the maintenance was to be performed by Twitter, not by their carrier
(i.e. server, not network, upgrades). Given the fact that the
WhaleFail has become a commonly-recognizable sight, I can see this
make people a bit, um,
On Jun 16, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
Erik Fichtner wrote:
And yet, all upgrades can be postponed with the right... motivation.
Hmmm, you do know that motivation may have strictly been, Your
maintenance corresponds with a major event, can you put it off for a
day?
The
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Tehran is currently UTC/GMT +4:30 hours. The current downtime is for 2:00 PM
Pacific, or 1:30 AM in
Tehran. That seems to be unfortunately still prime time for the nightly
demonstrations, one of which is
going on now.
If the idea is to avoid such
Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against Spamhaus's
droplist? That seems like an extraordinary claim, so I'm not satisfied
with the evidence provided. Is this not the best droplist?
-Original Message-
From: Dean Anderson [mailto:d...@av8.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15,
Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against Spamhaus's
droplist? That seems like an extraordinary claim, so I'm not satisfied
with the evidence provided. Is this not the best droplist?
Obviously the Spamhaus DROP list should be evaluated - you should not
use such lists
Also I don't like those lists at all
http://www.heise.de/ix/nixspam/dnsbl_en/
Heise do print the very important magazines IX, CT and others in germany.
They depend on their emails coming through.
Kind regards
Peter
Quinn Mahoney wrote:
Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared
On Jun 16, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Quinn Mahoney wrote:
Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against Spamhaus's
droplist? That seems like an extraordinary claim, so I'm not
satisfied
with the evidence provided. Is this not the best droplist?
Extraordinary claims require
http://wnagele.com/2007/06/19/spamhouseorg-vs-nicat/
Another problem with spamhaus, they want to earn money.
The Pirates Party in germany is a nonprofit.
Nevertheless our mailers use a fixed addresses and when
you query spamhaus long enough from a fixed address
you are put on a blacklist and fed
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Peter Dambier wrote:
http://wnagele.com/2007/06/19/spamhouseorg-vs-nicat/
Another problem with spamhaus, they want to earn money.
The Pirates Party in germany is a nonprofit.
Nevertheless our mailers use a fixed addresses and when
you query spamhaus long enough
Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against
Spamhaus's droplist?
Not that I've ever seen. Nobody else has the breadth of data that
Spamhaus does.
I've been using it for ages and based on zero complaints, it's never
blocked anything that any of my users wanted.
R's,
John
today, at our lunchtime meeting, the nanog program committee selected a new
chair, david meyer of cisco and university of oregon, and a new vice-chair,
tom daly of dynamic network services. please join me in cogratulating them
in person if you're here at nanog.
for the past two years, ren provo
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Stephen Kratzer wrote:
And, they have no plans to support IPv6.
Ouch!
I hope this is a non-starter for a lot of folks.
read the rest of the thread...
joel
Steve
Justin Shore wrote:
Paul Timmins wrote:
GlobalCrossing told me today I can order native IPv6 anywhere on their
network. Don't know if they count as Tier 1 on your list, though. VZB
has given me tunnels for a while, hopefully they'll get their pMTU
issue fixed so we can do more interesting
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:48:07 -0500
Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net wrote:
Erik Fichtner wrote:
And yet, all upgrades can be postponed with the right... motivation.
Hmmm, you do know that motivation may have strictly been, Your
maintenance corresponds with a major event, can you put
John Levine wrote:
Not that I've ever seen. Nobody else has the breadth of data that
Spamhaus does.
I've been using it for ages and based on zero complaints, it's never
blocked anything that any of my users wanted.
R's,
John
I have to agree with this...I'm somewhat surprised to see some
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Steve Pirkor...@pirk.com wrote:
There are some, ehrm, boxen out on the 'net to allow them to get around
the active blocking going on, but most of the citizen reporters are unable
to even get a conection to allow proxying out. Some serious censoring of
'net
An update here. Reuters is reporting that the US State Department is
behind this maintenance being pushed back.
http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSWBT01137420090616?feedType=RSSfeedName=internetNewsrpc=22sp=true
I find it very interesting that the US government is seeing the use
On 6/11/09 7:37 AM, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Stephen Kratzer wrote:
And, they have no plans to support IPv6.
Ouch!
I hope this is a non-starter for a lot of folks.
Steve
To quote Randy, I encourage all my competitors to do this.
Mike
19 matches
Mail list logo
