On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Quite frankly, your question reminds me a bit of the geography
question "where is the center of the US".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographic_center_of_the_contiguous_United_States
While nifty trivia, it acutally has no useful value for well,
anything.
In a message written on Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:39:05PM -0400, Sean Donelan
wrote:
> As I said in the original message, every nation in the world. Or more
> specifically the largest number of IP endpoints reachable in the most
> nations from the locations chosen.
>
> A = the few locations you p
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Randy Bush wrote:
The typical network architecture problem, what are the best (shortest
latency, greatest bandwidth, etc) locations to connect to the every
nation in the world? As you increase the number of locations, how do the
choices change?
If you only had small (2 3 5
In message <1b5c1c150907151452k52093694mc8b93538b4707...@mail.gmail.com>, Mike
Lyon writes:
> Howdy,
>
> I am curious what others in the industry think on this topic. When one
> registers a domain they can put in their real information or they can use a
> proxy, like Go-Daddy's Domains By Proxy.
This 100-line document contains 62% of what you need to know to avoid
annoying 10,000 people in your email to the NANOG list. It also contains
pointers to another 23%. Please take 5 minutes to read it before
you post [again].
General Information
===
About NANOG:http://
I've written up a wiki page:
http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/GeoIP
Please feel free to edit -- if you're too lazy to write but know something
is wrong/missing, please shoot me an e-mail offline with your "back of the
napkin" comments.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Chris Taylor [mailt
Mike Lyon wrote:
Howdy,
I am curious what others in the industry think on this topic. When one
registers a domain they can put in their real information or they can use a
proxy, like Go-Daddy's Domains By Proxy.
Now, personally, I would prefer just to get a PO Box and put that address on
my do
Not everybody charges for the service. Shop around.
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
I still think it's a huge waste of money.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Ray Sanders <
ray.sand...@villagevoicemedia.com> wrote:
And that falls right into some of the scare tactic sales pitc
I still think it's a huge waste of money.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Ray Sanders <
ray.sand...@villagevoicemedia.com> wrote:
> And that falls right into some of the scare tactic sales pitches the
> domain registrars use.
>
> "they can look up your domain and find your home address!"
>
> He
And that falls right into some of the scare tactic sales pitches the
domain registrars use.
"they can look up your domain and find your home address!"
Heck, even a p.o box could leave someone open to a stalker, if said
stalker is determined enough.
so yes, I'll concede that point to a certain
Mike Lyon wrote:
I am curious what others in the industry think on this topic. When one
registers a domain they can put in their real information or they can use a
proxy, like Go-Daddy's Domains By Proxy.
If you're using it for your business, the value is pretty slim. You
probably want your b
My opinion is that it's nothing more than a "value-add" for domain
registrars. The domain registration fees these days have razor thin
margins. So places like Godaddy and others offer these services to make
up for their domains essentially being "loss-leaders".
A lot of these places use scare ta
Howdy,
I am curious what others in the industry think on this topic. When one
registers a domain they can put in their real information or they can use a
proxy, like Go-Daddy's Domains By Proxy.
Now, personally, I would prefer just to get a PO Box and put that address on
my domain info instead of
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
[ clip ]
>
>
> Lastly, I'm going to suggest that this is drifting rather afar OT from
> the charter of the group, and suggest that the MLM may want to put the
> kibosh on this thread.
>
>
>
That's exactly what happened the last time we discus
We recently added another IPv6 interview to our ipv6actnow.org and
youtube pages. This time David Freedman talks about their planning and
deployment, including addressing plans and training, as well as the
MPLS issues that they faced.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQtbz1ahRxE
We plan to h
Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
A few others I would check:
- Akamai (you can contact them via their web page, but there are also people
on this listserv that can check, too)
- Google (if their search pages comes up in American English, you're good to
go, otherwise there's info in their help that
On Jul 15, 2009, at 5:07 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
The typical network architecture problem, what are the best
(shortest latency, greatest bandwidth, etc) locations to connect to
the every nation in the world? As you increase the number of
locations, how do the choices change?
If you only ha
All,
Thanks for the help. I just got word that AT&T approved the two BGP
peering with us. I think telling them others have done it with AT&T
helped.
Much appreciated.
-Jay
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> We are getting an Ethernet DIA circuit from AT&T but they insist t
A few others I would check:
- Akamai (you can contact them via their web page, but there are also people
on this listserv that can check, too)
- Google (if their search pages comes up in American English, you're good to
go, otherwise there's info in their help that will let you fill out a form)
-
ML wrote:
Chris Taylor wrote:
Would someone from hulu.com please contact me offlist?
Alternatively, if anyone has contact details for a vaguely clueful
person there, that would be appreciated.
We had a new range allocated to us by ARIN around 6 months ago for our
US business, and hulu are c
> The typical network architecture problem, what are the best (shortest
> latency, greatest bandwidth, etc) locations to connect to the every
> nation in the world? As you increase the number of locations, how do the
> choices change?
>
> If you only had small (2 3 5 7 11) number of locations,
Sean Donelan wrote:
> The typical network architecture problem, what are the best (shortest
> latency, greatest bandwidth, etc) locations to connect to the every
> nation in the world? As you increase the number of locations, how do
> the choices change?
>
> If you only had small (2 3 5 7 11) numb
The typical network architecture problem, what are the best (shortest
latency, greatest bandwidth, etc) locations to connect to the every
nation in the world? As you increase the number of locations, how do the
choices change?
If you only had small (2 3 5 7 11) number of locations, where woul
On Jul 15, 2009, at 7:29 AM, Charlie Allom wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in a claim made[1] that with the implementation of
EU Directive 2004/48/EC [2] that Swedish traffic dropped 40Gb/s:
http://stats.autonomica.se/mrtg/sums/All.html
Could this really mean that everyone in Sweden just 'turn
Hello,
I am interested in a claim made[1] that with the implementation of
EU Directive 2004/48/EC [2] that Swedish traffic dropped 40Gb/s:
http://stats.autonomica.se/mrtg/sums/All.html
Could this really mean that everyone in Sweden just 'turned off their
bittorrent clients' on the 1st of April?
Chris Taylor wrote:
Would someone from hulu.com please contact me offlist?
Alternatively, if anyone has contact details for a vaguely clueful
person there, that would be appreciated.
We had a new range allocated to us by ARIN around 6 months ago for our
US business, and hulu are claiming it'
Would someone from hulu.com please contact me offlist?
Alternatively, if anyone has contact details for a vaguely clueful
person there, that would be appreciated.
We had a new range allocated to us by ARIN around 6 months ago for our
US business, and hulu are claiming it's non-us. Our guess i
27 matches
Mail list logo
