On 02/02/2010 21:14, Scott Berkman wrote:
I was about to suggest IPPlan, but it is lacking the V6 support. Here is
one I found doing some searching, but I haven't used it myself:
We use IPPlan for ipv4 and a fairly flexible, but less fully featured
management program called vim for ipv6.
I'm actually writing some IP management code. Web based, it knows about the
difference between IPv4 and IPv6 in maybe 3 or 4 places.
Intention is to release it publicly when it's good to go.
On 3/02/2010, at 10:14 AM, Scott Berkman wrote:
I was about to suggest IPPlan, but it is lacking the V6
Andy Davidson (andy) writes:
It looks like the lack of ipv6 support in ipplan is partly due to
the maintainer not wanting to support it, so we might be tempted to
(if the license permits)
It's GPL... So for away :)
Also, you might want to look at TIPP:
Phil Regnauld (regnauld) writes:
Future of TIPP
- import/export from/to CSV;
- IP availability checks (pinging);
- editing ranges of IP addresses at once;
- plugin architecture for better integration with the existing systems;
- IPv6 support;
Update: IPv6 is planned during
Reminds me of the saying, nothing is foolproof given a sufficiently talented
fool. I do agree that checklist, peer reviews, parallel turnups, and lab
testing when used and not jury rigged have helped me prepare for issue.
Usually when I skipped those things are the time I kick myself for not
On 03/02/2010 12:51, Andy Davidson wrote:
It looks like the lack of ipv6 support in ipplan is partly due to the
maintainer not wanting to support it, so we might be tempted to (if the
license permits) fork the project and hack in support.
There is a FAQ entry for ipv6 support in ipplan:
One
It's not related to Canada directly but but it is related to your question.
The following links are to the NANOG archive from Sep 11th 2001 where there
was some very good communication, specifically from Sean Donnelan regarding
connectivity during crisis. It shows the unknowns that people faced
Nick Hilliard (nick) writes:
There is a FAQ entry for ipv6 support in ipplan:
One feature request that comes up from time to time is IPv6. Adding IPv6
support will require major effort but has such a limited audience.
Ironically the only people that ever requested IPv6 support are
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
On Feb 2, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Cerniglia, Brandon wrote:
Cervalis has facilities in wappingers ny
1.5 hours from NYC
Hmm -- where to the fibers run from a facility like that? Are the all homed
to NYC, or are there
Hello,
After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some
measurements to find out how polluted this block really is.
See some surprising results on RIPE Labs:
http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18
Please also note the call for feedback at the bottom of the article.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:49:00PM +0100,
Mirjam Kuehne m...@ripe.net wrote
a message of 15 lines which said:
After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some
measurements to find out how polluted this block really is.
See some surprising results on RIPE Labs:
Phil Regnauld wrote:
Nick Hilliard (nick) writes:
There is a FAQ entry for ipv6 support in ipplan:
One feature request that comes up from time to time is IPv6. Adding IPv6
support will require major effort but has such a limited audience.
Ironically the only people that ever requested IPv6
It should be of no surprise to anyone that a number of the remaining
prefixes are something of a mess(somebody ask t-mobile how they're using
14/8 internally for example). One's new ipv4 assignments are going to
be of significantly lower quality than the one received a decade ago,
The property is
In a message written on Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:49:00PM +0100, Mirjam Kuehne
wrote:
After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some
measurements to find out how polluted this block really is.
Having this data is useful, but I can't help to think it would be
more useful if it
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:46:07PM -0500, Stefan Fouant wrote:
Vijay Gill had some real interesting insights into this in a
presentation he gave back at NANOG 44:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog44/presentations/Monday/Gill_programatic_N44.pdf
His Blog article on Infrastructure is
Mike,
Is your interest events like the recent semi-non-event with H1N1,
where for contagation management, workforce labor and school age
children were not compulsorily aggregated, or morbidity and mortality
effects on network operator labor for an event such as the dispersal
of a weaponized
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:46:07PM -0500, Stefan Fouant wrote:
Vijay Gill had some real interesting insights into this in a
presentation he gave back at NANOG 44:
I haven't worked with them personally but am aware of FiberTech and have
spoken with them.
http://www.fibertech.com/enterprise/colocation-service/
If you need a contact him me off list.
--
Jeffrey Meltzer
Director of Network Operations
Long Island Fiber Exchange / Exobit Networks (A LIFE
Hi,
I juste added some preliminary support for FlowSpec (RFC5575) to my BGP route
injector http://bgp.exa.org.uk/
As I am not aware of any other project allowing to inject flow route into a
network, I am taking the liberty to plug it here.
You can access the SVN repository at:
Hello NANOG!
Does anyone know of some strong datacenters in northwestern NJ, or
north of Westchester NY without getting too far away from NYC?
I'm looking for a DR colo solution for a site that is in NYC; this
needs to be at least 50m away from NYC, but I'm trying to keep it not
too much
Hi All -
Does anyone have peering contacts for China Unicom and China Telecom?
Finding that the ones for Any2 in peeringdb.com are no good. Will
take replies offlist, thanks!
-justin
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:40:38AM -0800, Justin Ream wrote:
Hi All -
Does anyone have peering contacts for China Unicom and China Telecom?
Finding that the ones for Any2 in peeringdb.com are no good. Will
take replies offlist, thanks!
Last I checked the China Telecom e-mails listed worked
Having this data is useful, but I can't help to think it would be
more useful if it were compared with 27/8, or other networks. Is
this slightly worse, or significantly worse than other networks?
I have only anecdotal information regarding 45/8.
45/8 is assigned to Interop, and as such it
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Joel M Snyder wrote:
This information is very different from the RIPE Labs experiment which I
think showed that certain obvious addresses (1.1.1.1 seemed to be the
kicker in my short reading of their report) were being mis-used heavily.
But I suspect that 27/8 would have
Hello, longtime lurker here, an acquaintance is looking for lat/long
data and I thought this group might not object to this request. (if
you do, it's my fault, not that of Anselm).
-Randy Fischer
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anselm Hook
Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:14 PM
Get your data with these:
http://www.maxmind.com/app/api
From this database (OSS/Free):
http://www.maxmind.com/app/geolitecity
Map it with this
http://code.google.com/apis/kml/documentation/
Enjoy!
--chip
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Randy Fischer fisc...@sacred.net wrote:
Hello,
On 2/3/2010 2:19 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
I could see holding those prefixes aside for research purposes (spam
traps, honey pots, etc...).
I think it is too bad that we didn't have the forethought to route all
of those networks to 100-watt resistors some years ago.
When I last was
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 2/3/2010 2:19 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
I could see holding those prefixes aside for research purposes (spam
traps, honey pots, etc...).
I think it is too bad that we didn't have the forethought to route all of
those networks to 100-watt
If some unfortunate soul does get 1.1.1.1, 1.2.3.4, 1.3.3.7, etc, they
would also likely experience significant global reachability problems
in
addition to all of the unintended noise that gets sent their way.
There are many sites that specifically filter those addresses, in
addition to
I want to point out that OpenNetAdmin (ONA) is a great IP/DNS/Host
tracking tool, although not supporting IPv6 yet. It's the first GPL I
know of that uses the concept of an abstract host which can have
multiple DNS names or IPs. I used IPPLAN in the past but have recently
converted to ONA for
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:41 PM, chip chip.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Get your data with these:
http://www.maxmind.com/app/api
From this database (OSS/Free):
http://www.maxmind.com/app/geolitecity
In my experience Maxmind does at best a fairly ordinary job when it
comes to routers, especially if
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:15:30 +0100
Phil Regnauld regna...@nsrc.org wrote:
Nick Hilliard (nick) writes:
There is a FAQ entry for ipv6 support in ipplan:
One feature request that comes up from time to time is IPv6. Adding IPv6
support will require major effort but has such a limited
On Feb 3, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Joel M Snyder wrote:
Having this data is useful, but I can't help to think it would be
more useful if it were compared with 27/8, or other networks. Is
this slightly worse, or significantly worse than other networks?
I have only anecdotal information
On 4/02/2010, at 9:19 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
I would hope that the APNIC would opt not to assign networks that would
contain 1.1.1.1 or 1.2.3.4 to customers for exactly that reason. The
signal-to-noise ratio for those addresses is likely pretty high. The noise
is likely contained
3) Automation interfaces are largely unsupported:
CLI is an automation interface. Combine that with a management server
from which telnet sessions to the router can be managed, and you have
probably the lowest risk automation interface possible. This may force
you into building your own tools,
/20100203-vincente.pdf
Feedback welcome.
Regards,
Carlos Vicente
University of Oregon
Hi,
Pavel Dimow wrote:
does anybody knows what happend with ipat?
http://nethead.de/index.php/ipat
http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Tools_and_Resources
i did take the sources offline a couple of weeks ago cause there didnt
seemed to be a lot interest in the software.
If you want i can
Please do send the dn/load link .. thanks
- Arnd Vehling a...@nethead.de wrote:
Hi,
Pavel Dimow wrote:
does anybody knows what happend with ipat?
http://nethead.de/index.php/ipat
http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Tools_and_Resources
i did take the sources offline a couple
we have recently started getting alot of spam, out of dubai, from
ecampaigners@gmail.com
all of the spam comes from/through google and google groups.
is this accepted/supported activity on google?
if not, where might i find a contact who can cluefully respond?
--
Jim Mercer
You can completely implement Vijay's most impressive stuff and simply
move the problem to a different level of abstraction.
No matter what you do, it still comes down to some geek banging on
some plastic thingy. I'm as likely to screw up an Extensible
Entity-Attribute-Relationship as I am an
ab...@gmail.com maybe? Looks like some random spammer based in Dubai
judging by the airport code.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote:
we have recently started getting alot of spam, out of dubai, from
ecampaigners@gmail.com
all of the spam comes
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:35:06PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
ab...@gmail.com maybe? Looks like some random spammer based in Dubai
judging by the airport code.
yeah, tried that several times. seems to go to a black hole.
i've engaged the spammer, and they are telling me that they
Google groups cautions you about pre-emptively adding people if you
choose this method of subscribing them.
On 02/04/10 02:12, Jim Mercer wrote:
[...]
and google is ok with that?
geez, do no harm
really?
--jim
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 02:49:42AM -0500, David Ford wrote:
Google groups cautions you about pre-emptively adding people if you
choose this method of subscribing them.
here, have some free guns. oh, by the way, its probably bad if you go around
shooting people, so don't do that.
it is
44 matches
Mail list logo
