On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Bryan Irvine wrote:
would pfsense work for you?
pfSense has ipv6, since it's essentially just a freebsd kernel with a
layer on top. However, ipv6 support in the GUI is fairly minimal to
non-existant, and I wouldn't recommend it if you really want to use
ipv6.
Mind you, I'm
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 17:12 -0700, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distro?
Currently using IPCop but it lacks ipv6 support. I've used SmoothWall
Express but not in some time and not sure how well it works with IPv6. Not
looking
Hi,
We are using 6to4 on our fallback site because the provider there is
not able to provide us native IPv6 yet. We have also installed a
fallback nameserver over there using a 6to4 address.
This works good and no complains what so ever in the past.
However, last week Denic (registry for .de)
At 13:26 +0100 2/11/10, Igor Ybema wrote:
Ok, policy is policy and we should not complain.
No, really, policies should be examined and questioned.
Having been in policy meetings, unless the operations crowd openly
questions and gives feed back, the meetings are just wastes of time.
Can I have question?
What is dark fiber?
Thank you
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, James Jones ja...@freedomnet.co.nz wrote:
I am doing some researchis there a way to find out where there is dark
fiber and who own's it?
On 11/02/2010 12:26, Igor Ybema wrote:
Ok, policy is policy and we should not complain. However, I'm asking
your opinions about this policy. I find this really stupid because
this completely brakes use for 6to4 in Germany and their is no good
reason to block it.
Someone once asked Angela
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_fibre
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.comwrote:
Can I have question?
What is dark fiber?
Thank you
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, James Jones ja...@freedomnet.co.nz
wrote:
I am doing some researchis there a
GOOGLE: Dark fiber is optical fiber infrastructure (cabling and repeaters) that
is currently in place but is not being used. Optical fiber conveys information
in the form of light pulses so the dark means no light pulses are being sent.
For example, some electric utilities have installed
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:21, Jess Cohen j...@corenap.com wrote:
GOOGLE: Dark fiber is optical fiber infrastructure (cabling and repeaters)
that is currently in place but is not being used. Optical fiber conveys
information in the form of light pulses so the dark means no light pulses
are
On Feb 11, 2010, at 8:15 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 11/02/2010 12:26, Igor Ybema wrote:
Ok, policy is policy and we should not complain. However, I'm asking
your opinions about this policy. I find this really stupid because
this completely brakes use for 6to4 in Germany and their is no good
Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
the freebsd-isp list.
-Jack Carrozzo
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:23 AM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 17:12 -0700, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack
not usually my style to whine, but...
So I send an online request for Wholesale IP Transit to ATT
via their web site, and several days later, I get an e-mail
from one of their staff directing me to another link where I
should fill up my information (again). Suffice it to say her
e-mail to me
Mark Tinka wrote:
not usually my style to whine, but...
ATT, what gives?
/not usually my style to whine, but...
You need the proper perspective on these things. Rent and watch this
classic movie from 1967, then you'll understand.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062153/
--
Jay Hennigan -
I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one
connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise
connection (which supposedly will do BGP now).
When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with 256MB was more than
adequate. With routing tables
On 2/11/2010 10:53, James Smallacombe wrote:
I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one
connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise
connection (which supposedly will do BGP now).
When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with
You can squeeze by with 512MB, but 1GB of ram would be better.
A 7204VXR with 1GB of ram will work fine. You can also squeeze by with a 2951
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff | Fax:
On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
That's IODEF, if and when it picks up enough steam to get widely deployed.
That looks over-engineered, but at least someone can create a web service
where the user can fill in fields
On 2/11/2010 1:53 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one
connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise
connection (which supposedly will do BGP now).
When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with
In message a05493651002110426u7d9688c9i273ff64c456ec...@mail.gmail.com, Igor
Ybema writes:
Hi,
We are using 6to4 on our fallback site because the provider there is
not able to provide us native IPv6 yet. We have also installed a
fallback nameserver over there using a 6to4 address.
This
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:05 -0500, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
the freebsd-isp list.
FreeBSD's network stack chokes up in DDoS attacks due to interrupt
flooding. We used to use FreeBSD for firewalling and basic routing, but
when
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:12:03PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:05 -0500, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
the freebsd-isp list.
FreeBSD's network stack chokes up in DDoS attacks due to interrupt
flooding.
William Pitcock wrote:
FreeBSD's network stack chokes up in DDoS attacks due to interrupt
flooding. We used to use FreeBSD for firewalling and basic routing, but
when noticing that we had horizontal scalability (e.g. a Celeron 667mhz
performed nearly as well as a dual dual-core Xeon system
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:20:13 -0500
From: Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:12:03PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:05 -0500, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
the freebsd-isp list.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:46:13PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Polling is excellent for low speed lines, but for Gig and faster, most
newer interfaces support interrupt coalescing. This easily resolves the
issue in hardware as interrupts are only issued when needed but limited
to a reasonable
I'm trying to diagnose an issue with 192.255.103.x
As far as I can tell from IANA, the block 192/8 is allocated to ARIN.
ARIN does not have a record of 192.255.103 being allocated to anybody.
Here is the issue ... the customer insists that is the correct IP and
for a few hours yesterday, it was
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:41 PM, J.D. Falk
jdfalk-li...@cybernothing.org wrote:
Some types of conversations simply don't take well to automation.
However, automatically indexing/archiving such conversations for
future reference can be useful (and can assist participants to the
conversation in
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Hector Herrera hectorherr...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I can tell from IANA, the block 192/8 is allocated to ARIN.
ARIN does not have a record of 192.255.103 being allocated to anybody.
I can infer very strongly that the block has probably not been
allocated,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:12 PM, James Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Hector Herrera hectorherr...@gmail.com
wrote:
As far as I can tell from IANA, the block 192/8 is allocated to ARIN.
ARIN does not have a record of 192.255.103 being allocated to anybody.
I
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:30:11PM -0800, Hector Herrera wrote:
I'm trying to diagnose an issue with 192.255.103.x
As far as I can tell from IANA, the block 192/8 is allocated to ARIN.
ARIN does not have a record of
Also IIRC you can tune the hash cache / tree algorithm - ie if your
traffic is mostly a few addresses then the default prefix search is
fine (with the caching) but for more sparse traffic as you'd see at an
edge, disabling the cache and using the other algo proved a lot
faster. There's a paper on
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Hector Herrera hectorherr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:30:11PM -0800, Hector Herrera wrote:
I'm trying to diagnose an issue with 192.255.103.x
As far as I can tell
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:27:38PM -0800, Hector Herrera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:30:11PM -0800, Hector Herrera wrote:
I'm trying to diagnose an issue with 192.255.103.x
As far as I can tell from IANA, the
32 matches
Mail list logo
