Hello,
I'm hoping to alleviate the "what's going on!?" type messages here this time. :)
Here's an except from the APNIC provided LOA I provided to a couple
networks, to carry a new announcement...
"To whom it may concern,
APNIC and YouTube are cooperating in a project to investigate the
propert
Well, those UDP captures appear to be BitTorrent Peer-to-Peer file
sharing traffic, or something disguised as such.
Note the "64 31 3a 61 64 32 3a 69 64 32 30 3a"
and also the textual reference to info_hash
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Joe wrote:
>
> Not to distract from the IPV4/IPV6 th
Not to distract from the IPV4/IPV6 thread, but just wondering if anyone has
seen this beavior or perhaps can enlighten me to its orgin/virus/meaning?
Internet Protocol, Src: 183.0.215.179 (183.0.215.179), Dst: 192.168.1.52
(192.168.1.52)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 64514 (64514), Dst Port:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:25 PM, TJ wrote:
>> Hmm, apologies - I was not explicit in calling out VZW; meant to, my bad and
>> thanks for pointing it out!
>
> yup, the core point I was trying to make was that LTE is really just a
> vzw n
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:25 PM, TJ wrote:
> Hmm, apologies - I was not explicit in calling out VZW; meant to, my bad and
> thanks for pointing it out!
yup, the core point I was trying to make was that LTE is really just a
vzw network change, and has basically nothing to do with 'verizon'
network
How do these compare to the Avocent/Cyclades serial console products? SNMP
seems poorly implemented in the Cyclades, and if folks have good things to
say about using the OpenGear stuff, it's a direction I'd want to move in.
Private replies preferred to keep s/n down.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:10
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Staal [mailto:dst...@usa.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:37 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Need advise for a linux firewall
>
> --As of March 11, 2010 4:22:38 PM +, gordon b slater is alleged to
> have
> said:
>
> > One caveat for t
In message <2d6a9f6f1003111016t16ddc73frc4a430e220891...@mail.gmail.com>, Bill
Bogstad writes:
> I fall into this category, but I'm trying to get better. This may be
> OT for this forum, but as someone whose network admin hat has mostly
> been at the LAN/MAN level, I'm less concerned about IPv6
--As of March 11, 2010 4:22:38 PM +, gordon b slater is alleged to have
said:
One caveat for the current PFsense: traffic shaping in 1.2.3 release is
somewhat borked (1.2.2 works much better) and it doesn't work with more
than 2 interfaces, so 1 wan - 1 lan is OK.
--As for the rest, it is
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
>>>
>> PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your
Hmm, apologies - I was not explicit in calling out VZW; meant to, my bad and
thanks for pointing it out!
Posting from phone, while distracted . less than ideal.
/TJ
From: TJ [mailto:trej...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 17:52
To: Christopher Morrow
Subject: Re: IPv6 enabled
+1 for the Arista boxes.
We are a pure Cisco shop and looked at them to start replacing some gear
where it made sense. We didn't buy them because they didn't do
Rapid-PVST+ at the time. Yeah I know that's a Cisco-centric thing, but
they were tentative on implementing it but the timeline just didn'
Microtik makes a pretty robust Linux based firewall
appliance-on-a-usb-stick. It does a lot out of the box like BGP, VPN,
MPLS,QoS and all kinds of other crazy things you wouldn't expect to fit on
one gig of flash. It takes my HP about 10 seconds to load a full table.
My vote is for PFSense though
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:51:00 -0800
> From: Dave Temkin
>
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:26:16 +0900
> >> From: Randy Bush
> >>
> >>
> >>> arista 7120t-4s...
> >>>
> >> hot box. but you are giving away the secret sauce!
> >>
> >
> > Hot box for the da
On Mar 11, 2010 2:05pm, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM, TJ trej...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chris Woodfield
rek...@semihuman.com>wrote:
>
>> To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will
change"
>> - is V
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM, TJ wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
>
>> To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will change"
>> - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers? While ARIN is
>> allocating /40s and /48s directly?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:20:41PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> On 11.03.2010 16:29 Dylan Ebner wrote
>
> > Do the Arista switches support netflow? From a management perspective
> > netflow can be vital. This is something we have been unhappy with on
> > our 3560 and 3750 cisco's.
> >
>
> They
On 11.03.2010 16:29 Dylan Ebner wrote
> Do the Arista switches support netflow? From a management perspective
> netflow can be vital. This is something we have been unhappy with on
> our 3560 and 3750 cisco's.
>
They don't (yet). Given you buy enoughboxes, Arista may be willing to
implement this
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> TJ wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chris Woodfield >wrote:
> >
> >> To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will
> change"
> >> - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers? While ARIN is
> >
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:26:16 +0900
From: Randy Bush
arista 7120t-4s...
hot box. but you are giving away the secret sauce!
Hot box for the datacenter, but small buffers make it unsuited for
long distances. In the right place, this box can't be beaten
On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Daniel Senie wrote:
Well, it's like this... there's still no native IPv6 connectivity
in most data centers, residences, >businesses or wireless, most
vendors of networking equipment have not had a lot of mi
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
> >
> >
> >> iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
> >>
> > PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under
On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
>
>
>> iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
>>
> PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your "other" category)
> It uses the OpenBSD-based pf firewa
I will likely never buy or recommend Foundry equipment again. In a previous
gig, a HPC enviorment, they caused us many problems, support was horrible,
and thier 10Gbit kit was the pits when it was first released (no idea how it is
now or what they offer, its been 5 years since. burnt onc
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 2:19 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?
On 3/10/10 11:00 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today?
>
Sprint wasn't on
From: Malte von dem Hagen [mailto:m...@hosteurope.de]
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 11.03.10 16:29 schrieb Dylan Ebner:
> > Do the Arista switches support netflow?
>
> nothing about it in the datasheets, and regarding documentation:
>
> "A registered account and a valid support contract is
> required to acc
TJ wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
>
>> To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will change"
>> - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers? While ARIN is
>> allocating /40s and /48s directly?
>>
>
> I believe so ... will be e
Hi,
Am 11.03.10 15:50 schrieb Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]:
> which "known" brand can it be compared to?
the CLI looks IOSish. Pity.
.m
--
Malte von dem Hagen
Teamleitung Network Engineering & Operation
Abteilung Technik
---
Host Europ
Hi,
Am 11.03.10 16:29 schrieb Dylan Ebner:
> Do the Arista switches support netflow?
nothing about it in the datasheets, and regarding documentation:
"A registered account and a valid support contract is required to access the
Software Download and Documentation section of the website."
Service
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Daniel Senie wrote:
> Well, it's like this... there's still no native IPv6 connectivity in most
> data centers, residences, >businesses or wireless, most vendors of networking
> equipment have not had a lot of mileage on >their IPv6 code if they even have
> it
We have used the 2.4GHz version of the Exalt radio - the EX-2.4i. We were
fairly happy with it. The latency and jitter was great for a TDD radio, better
than any I have seen. It was very reliable from a data-forwarding perspective.
The management interface was nice when it worked, but the HTTP i
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 19:06, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote:>
> On a similar topic, any good solutions for out-of-band serial
> console/Ethernet solutions that use EV-DO/GSM wireless Internet?
Check these out: http://www.opengear.com/product-acm5000.html
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, gordon b slater wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:01 -0800, Marty Anstey wrote:
>
>> +1 for pfsense. I've been running it for over 18 months with no problems
>> whatsoever. It does everything I needed it to do, and quite a bit more.
>
>
> actually, reading back on
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will change"
> - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers? While ARIN is
> allocating /40s and /48s directly?
>
I believe so ... will be even more impactful as
Airaya will do 1600 bytes packets.
http://www.airaya.com/
On 3/11/2010 8:50 AM, Stefano Gridelli wrote:
The motorola PTP 600 seems thus far the most valid solution. We want to
remain on ISM bands, because we don't want to take the burden of renewing
the license with FCC every x years ... we n
On 3/11/10 9:01 AM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will
> change" - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers? While
> ARIN is allocating /40s and /48s directly?
>
As far as I know, yes.
~Seth
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:01 -0800, Marty Anstey wrote:
> +1 for pfsense. I've been running it for over 18 months with no problems
> whatsoever. It does everything I needed it to do, and quite a bit more.
actually, reading back on the nanog list for a few plays (playing
catch-up here) pfsense wou
We love the PTP600 platform and it works very well for our needs - as
good as any path profile has shown us.
Depending on the height of the tower, you can handoff via copper or via
multimode fiber (someone said it doesn't do multimode, we do it all the
time with their "fiber kits" from Motorola).
To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will
change" - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers?
While ARIN is allocating /40s and /48s directly?
-C
On Mar 10, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 3/10/10 11:00 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
Does anyon
>
> PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your "other" category)
> It uses the OpenBSD-based pf firewall, with a web-based GUI for almost
> everything (except maybe console resets). works for me in several
> locations, some `heavy and high`.
>
>
+1 for pfsense. I've been running it for
The motorola PTP 600 seems thus far the most valid solution. We want to
remain on ISM bands, because we don't want to take the burden of renewing
the license with FCC every x years ... we need something that once installed
requires the least maintenance effort possible.
We already have antennas and
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
> iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your "other" category)
It uses the OpenBSD-based pf firewall, with a web-based GUI for almost
everything (except maybe consol
try http://www.zeroshell.net/eng/
2010/3/11 Abdul Nazeer :
> Looking for advise on setting up a linux based dedicated firewall.
> Apparently, there are plenty:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_router_or_firewall_distributions
>
> I'm looking to have the firewall sit in front of a public ne
fwbuilder
Looking for advise on setting up a linux based dedicated firewall.
Apparently, there are plenty:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_router_or_firewall_distributions
I'm looking to have the firewall sit in front of a public network of
windows boxes. Also, would want to be able to load-balance an
Do the Arista switches support netflow? From a management perspective netflow
can be vital. This is something we have been unhappy with on our 3560 and 3750
cisco's.
Dylan
-Original Message-
From: Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] [mailto:r.bha...@ipax.at]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 8:50 AM
T
> "Arista EOS" - what good/bad things do you have to say about their
> management capabilities? which "known" brand can it be compared to?
I couldn't help myself thinking that the name of an operanting system
shouldn't resemble "End of Sales" that much.
Rubens
On 03/11/2010 07:04 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:26:16 +0900
>> From: Randy Bush
>>
>>> arista 7120t-4s...
>>
>> hot box. but you are giving away the secret sauce!
>
> Hot box for the datacenter, but small buffers make it unsuited for
> long distances. In the right place
+1 for the ShrewSoft Client for Windows 7. Works like a champ.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Jon Auer [mailto:j...@tapodi.net]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 2:54 PM
To: Blomberg, Orin P (DOH)
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Best VPN Appliance
If you can use 3rd party VPN clients the S
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 15:17:53PM -0500, Michael Holstein wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a cheap Ethernet to Serial (RS232/422/485)
> converter with functionality like the Lantronix boxes .. except one that
> supports access lists (nothing complicated .. maybe a list of 5 approved
> hosts). I need
On Mar 11, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I'm sorry, but some people are spending too much time denying
>> history. IPv6 has been largely ready for YEARS. Less than five years ago
>> a lot of engineers were declaring IPv6 dead and telling people that
>> double and triple NAT was the way o
What NANOG contributors, if any, are invited by a government, to join
their national delegation to the initial meeting of the ITU's IPv6
Group in Geneva next week?
> I'm sorry, but some people are spending too much time denying
> history. IPv6 has been largely ready for YEARS. Less than five years ago
> a lot of engineers were declaring IPv6 dead and telling people that
> double and triple NAT was the way of the future. It's only been over the
> past two year
Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Chris Grundemann wrote:
>> SixXS maintains a list here:
>> http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=ipv6transit.
>
> I think that list should also include TeliaSonera. TSIC does offer v6
> transit, although their product sheet only mentions IPv4.
"Upda
54 matches
Mail list logo
