On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 14:50 -0400, Daniel Senie wrote:
As you note, debugging this type of thing is often not intuitive, as
everything appears to work from almost everywhere
I got curious yesterday and set off a couple (very slow {option -T0},
very polite, very restrictive) nmap single port
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 06:08 +, gordon b slater wrote:
It looks like chaos-squared out there. I don't envy anyone fathoming
that stuff out for real.
clarification: `chaos` due to our ISP running internal boxes on the
range in question, rather than external chaos.
The implication being: if
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Guillaume FORTAINE gforta...@live.com wrote:
Misses, Misters,
You forgot the ballers, shot callers, brawlers, those who dippin' in
the benz with the spoilers. [0]
I would want to inform you that the security of the Internet, that is
discussed in the NSP-SEC
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:43:18 +0100
Guillaume FORTAINE gforta...@live.com wrote:
First question : Why was I able to find this mail on the Internet if
it should be kept secret ?
nsp-security was originally formed out of the dissatisfaction with
other so-called private collaborative channels back
I'd like to nominate this for the Best of Nanog 2010.
In a message written on Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:50:37AM -0700, Paul WALL wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Guillaume FORTAINE gforta...@live.com
wrote:
Misses, Misters,
You forgot the ballers, shot callers, brawlers, those who
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks.
Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing? This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they
have to be
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:42:44 PDT, Leo Bicknell said:
I'd like to nominate this for the Best of Nanog 2010.
Amen to that. As the Jargon File says, C|NK. Unfortunately, I was
eating breakfast, and it was corn flakes not coffee. Ouch.
pgpxfLFPGhvAM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Total transparency in security matters works about as well as it would for law
enforcement: fine for tactical concerns, but not so great for long-term
strategic concerns.
-David Barak
On Fri Mar 19th, 2010 9:44 AM EDT William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:44:29AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks.
Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing? This
All:
Does anyone know anything about a Cogent outage yesterday?
Thanks,
Lorell Hathcock
There are some out there..Infragard?(shrugs shoulders)..
-Original Message-
From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
[mailto:bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:57 AM
To: William Pitcock
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity
On
On 3/19/2010 08:44, William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks.
Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing? This seems to be the plight
On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:56 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:44:29AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks.
Have you ever
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:43:18 BST, Guillaume FORTAINE said:
First question : Why was I able to find this mail on the Internet if it
should be kept secret ?
Congratulations. You found an example of a mailing list where applying a
standard disclaimer by default *does* make sense, which then got
I love war stories. I once got chewed out by a colleague ? from
another organization because we were using their address space.
We were using 10.0.0.0/8. Explanation of NAT and RFC1918 was met with
a deer in the headlights look.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Matt Shadbolt
IMHO, I think you have it backwards. I see strategic discussions (like
new crypto algorithms, technologies, initiatives, etc) should be open to
public debate, review, and scrutiny. But operational/tactical discussions
(like new malware, software exploits, virus infected hosts, botnets, etc)
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:08:55 CDT, Adam Stasiniewicz said:
IMHO, I think you have it backwards. I see strategic discussions (like
new crypto algorithms, technologies, initiatives, etc) should be open to
public debate, review, and scrutiny. But operational/tactical discussions
(like new
--- On Fri, 3/19/10, Adam Stasiniewicz a...@adamstas.com wrote:
IMHO, I think you have it
backwards. I see strategic discussions (like
new crypto algorithms, technologies, initiatives, etc)
should be open to
public debate, review, and scrutiny. But
operational/tactical discussions
(like
On 3/19/10 6:42 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I'd like to nominate this for the Best of Nanog 2010.
I'd like to second/third/whatever that nomination as well. :)
Epic win. Not only did it make me fall off the chair laughing, but I
highly doubt Fortaine will understand why its so funny.
Chuck - Very true...
What about the time our old manager (MARTIN) gave your old organization that
Entire Class B
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Charles Mills w3y...@gmail.com wrote:
I love war stories. I once got chewed out by a colleague ? from
another organization because we were
When the Sun shines upon Earth, 2 - major Time points are created on
opposite sides of Earth - known as Midday and Midnight. Where the 2
major Time forces join, synergy creates 2 new minor Time points we
recognize as Sunup and Sundown. The 4-equidistant Time points can be
considered as Time
Thanks for the responses to my query.
Here's what happened to my network.
On 3/17/2010 in the morning Central Time in Houston we started having issues
connecting to parts of the rest of the world on an intermittent basis. We
were troubleshooting our own equipment for quite some time and
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks.
Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing? This seems to be the plight
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith
Is there a manager in the ATT MIS Testing center by chance on the list, or
anyone have a contact that can put me in direct touch with one? I've got one
circuit out of a bonded set that the testing center has had in a loopback
now for almost 24 hours and after level 3 escalation, it's still not
BGP Update Report
Interval: 11-Mar-10 -to- 18-Mar-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS665 99574 8.9%1059.3 -- DNIC-ASBLK-00616-00665 - DoD
Network Information Center
2
This report has been generated at Fri Mar 19 21:11:43 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
I'd like to nominate this for the Best of Nanog 2010.
+1. Does the nomination include a sample ?
J
Paul Ferguson expunged (fergdawgs...@gmail.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or
how much power it would consume? Or how much heat it would generate?
Admittedly, my information on these topics comes from NPR
Thats funny, not sure if Cisco sells one or not but back in the day, I
worked @ Avici, and we did in fact have a special jack used to move
the chassis around :)
-jim
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Steve Meuse sme...@mara.org wrote:
Paul Ferguson expunged (fergdawgs...@gmail.com):
30 matches
Mail list logo
