On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:48:52 -0600
Tom Ammon tom.am...@utah.edu wrote:
RFC1918 is a good place to start ;)
Most of the issues in
Deprecating Site Local Addresses
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3879.txt
identified in IPv6 Site-Local addressing also apply to
duplicated/overlapping IPv4
It sounds like this range was just recently assigned -- is there any
document (RFC?) or source I could look through to learn more about
this, and/or provide evidence to my client
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/
Thanks,
Jaren
--
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:10:04PM -0700, Mike wrote:
With all due respect and acknowledgment of the tremendous contributions of
ISC and you yourself Mr. Hankins, I have to comment that failover in
isc-dhcp is broken by design because it requires the amount of handholding
and operator
Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
On 03/20/2010 09:12 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
2. Show you are responsive and responsible in handling issues in your
own back yard.
On 19 March 2010 14:19, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
You *do* realize that
there's an estimated 140,000,000 bots on the net, right
As many as that? Thats 1 in 12 according to
http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm. Lets be honest, I don't
follow the world wide bot crisis because as your
Hello everyone,
This might be slightly off topic, but I am shutting down a large
network, and selling off the assets.
Information is @ www.ronan-online/forsale.html
I will be adding items to the list as they come offline, as well as
the location of each asset.
Email me with any questions or
www.ronan-online.com/forsale.html
On Mar 21, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
Hello everyone,
This might be slightly off topic, but I am shutting down a large
network, and selling off the assets.
Information is @ www.ronan-online/forsale.html
I will be adding items to the list as they
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:37:09PM +, James Bensley wrote:
On 19 March 2010 14:19, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
You *do* realize that
there's an estimated 140,000,000 bots on the net, right
As many as that? Thats 1 in 12 according to
http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
I
From: Rich Kulawiec [...@gsp.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 8:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: NSP-SEC
There is, by the way, no relief from this due to events like the
recent bust of the Mariposa botnet (13M systems);
The public numbers
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:37:09 -, James Bensley said:
On 19 March 2010 14:19, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
You *do* realize that
there's an estimated 140,000,000 bots on the net, right
As many as that? Thats 1 in 12 according to
That was Vint Cerf's number as of 2007 or so. He dropped
On Mar 21, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Alex Lanstein wrote:
There is, by the way, no relief from this due to events like the
recent bust of the Mariposa botnet (13M systems);
The public numbers advertised were 13M _IPs_ connecting to a sinkhole over
more than a month's time. When I've had
11 matches
Mail list logo
