Re: BGP and convergence time

2010-05-19 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On 05/12/2010 02:41 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > --- da...@tcb.net wrote: From: Danny McPherson On May > 12, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Jay Nakamura wrote: > >> I just tested this and, yes, with Cisco to Cisco, changing the >> setting won't reset the connection but you have to reset the >> connection

Re: GSM modem test point with data and SMS support

2010-05-19 Thread joel jaeggli
On 2010-05-19 14:18, Aaron D. Osgood wrote: Probably because MO/MT (mobile originated/mobile terminated) SMS takes place on the cellular "control" channel (somewhat like the "D" channel on a PRI span) and is not seen as "data" by the carrier. A GPRS station class A device can do this... they

Re: AT&T Wireless DNS contact

2010-05-19 Thread Franck Martin
iPhones (at the time of 2G) used to have a major issue, they would not fallback to the secondary DNS if the first failed. - Original Message - From: "Adam J. Henson (ARC-IO)[PEROT SYSTEMS]" To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, 19 May, 2010 11:28:32 PM Subject: AT&T Wireless DNS contact

AT&T Wireless DNS contact

2010-05-19 Thread Henson, Adam J. (ARC-IO)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
Hi all, Apologies for the spam, but can someone at AT&T Wireless with DNS clue contact me off-list? Our iPhones are receiving intermittent SERVFAILs when querying your DNS servers over 3G. We're trying to go through the support chain but it's getting us nowhere fast. Thanks, Adam Henson Net

Re: GSM modem test point with data and SMS support

2010-05-19 Thread Aaron D. Osgood
Probably because MO/MT (mobile originated/mobile terminated) SMS takes place on the cellular "control" channel (somewhat like the "D" channel on a PRI span) and is not seen as "data" by the carrier. Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with Nextel Direct Connect -Original Message- From:

HUMOUR: http://xkcd.com/742/

2010-05-19 Thread Jeroen van Aart
http://xkcd.com/742/ is a bit funny, especially if you read the "alt" text of the image. Especially in the light of ongoing discussions about IPv6 :-) -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/

RE: GSM modem test point with data and SMS support

2010-05-19 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
Thanks for your response and three I received off-list. Multi-tech confirmed that none of their models can do SMS and EDGE at the same time. They have to be out of PPP mode to send and receive SMS. Frank -Original Message- From: Adam Kennedy [mailto:adamkenn...@omnicity.net] Sent: Wedn

Re: useful bgp example

2010-05-19 Thread Jim Burwell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/19/2010 11:58, Dan White wrote: > You should be using 192.168.2.0 for documented examples,or at least > private > space. Configs like this tend to get cut and pasted into routers and > get > changed only when they don't work. Should that be 192.0

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 06:11:34PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > There's this old joke - spread across multiple countries around the > world - about there being three ways to do something .. > > 1. The right way > 2. The wrong way > 3. The army way I know it as "3. The railway", and boy

RE: useful bgp example

2010-05-19 Thread Vincent C Jones
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 13:37 -0500, Jeff Harper wrote: > > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:29 PM > > To: Jeff Harper > > Cc: Deric Kwok; nanog@nanog.org > > Subject: Re: useful bgp example > > > > Nice, but you don't show it as-path filtering y

Re: useful bgp example

2010-05-19 Thread Dan White
On 19/05/10 13:37 -0500, Jeff Harper wrote: -Original Message- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:29 PM To: Jeff Harper Cc: Deric Kwok; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: useful bgp example Nice, but you don't show it as-path filtering your transit

RE: useful bgp example

2010-05-19 Thread Jeff Harper
> -Original Message- > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:29 PM > To: Jeff Harper > Cc: Deric Kwok; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: useful bgp example > > Nice, but you don't show it as-path filtering your transits out. I > frequently see pe

Re: useful bgp example

2010-05-19 Thread Jared Mauch
On May 19, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Jeff Harper wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Deric Kwok [mailto:deric.kwok2...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:15 PM >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: useful bgp example >> >> Hi >> >> My company will get 2 upstream provider. We will plan 2

Re: [OT]Bounce Back

2010-05-19 Thread Benjamin BILLON
High and bad, the message says it all! http://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx This is bad luck for you as you don't choose which IP address googlemail will use to contact Hotmail UK's servers. Le 19/05/2010 17:15, James Bensley a écrit : Got the below message back from Hotmail when em

[OT]Bounce Back

2010-05-19 Thread James Bensley
Got the below message back from Hotmail when emailing a friend I email every week. I have never experienced this particular error before, is this just an indication of high traffic between Google Mail and Hotmail? -- Forwarded message -- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem Date: 18 May

RE: GSM modem test point with data and SMS support

2010-05-19 Thread Adam Kennedy
Some additional information on the SAMBA modems can be found at the manufacturer site: http://www.falcomusa.com/ -- Adam Kennedy Network Engineer Omnicity, Inc. -Original Message- From: Adam Kennedy [mailto:adamkenn...@omnicity.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 10:18 AM To: frnk...@ina

RE: GSM modem test point with data and SMS support

2010-05-19 Thread Adam Kennedy
The SAMBA modems are USB powered and can respond to normal AT commands for things like signal strength and so forth. Using the sms-tools kit, you can also send/receive SMS messages. The SAMBA modem I have supports EDGE. -- Adam Kennedy Network Engineer Omnicity, Inc. -Original Message-

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Nils Kolstein
There is not. The various branches we worked with wouldn't touch it unless the ticket originated internally. Once that happened, we found them to be very cooperative and helpful. Another note - each branch is separate for the most part. If you're having problems reaching the Army, Navy, Nati

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Jeroen Massar
On 2010-05-19 14:36, Malte von dem Hagen wrote: [..] I am aware of this way, sure. I just hoped, there would be a more... efficient way. State publically that you know the location of a known terrorist somewhere in the top X of the wanted list. Tell them that they can reach you at email addre

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Marc Powell
> I am aware of this way, sure. I just hoped, there would be a more... > efficient way. There is not. The various branches we worked with wouldn't touch it unless the ticket originated internally. Once that happened, we found them to be very cooperative and helpful. Another note - each branch

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
There's this old joke - spread across multiple countries around the world - about there being three ways to do something .. 1. The right way 2. The wrong way 3. The army way viel glück On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Malte von dem Hagen wrote: > Am 19.05.10 14:28, schrieb Suresh Ramasubramania

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Malte von dem Hagen
Am 19.05.10 14:24, schrieb William Hamilton: >> Any further hints? > > Raise the issue from outside your network? That's difficult, without any contact information. Am 19.05.10 14:28, schrieb Suresh Ramasubramanian: > Your customer contacts his contact (friend / relative / customer etc) > in the

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Malte von dem Hagen wrote: > We cannot reach www.army.mil, we cannot reach their nameservers, we > cannot reach their MXes. Any further hints? In plainer english - Your customer contacts his contact (friend / relative / customer etc) in the US army The army guy c

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread William Hamilton
On 19/05/2010 13:18, Malte von dem Hagen wrote: > On May 19, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Robert D. Scott wrote: > >> Normally you need to contact the entity you cannot reach, and they will open >> a ticket backwards through MilNet. This is the only process I have been able >> to get to work. >> > Wel

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Malte von dem Hagen
On May 19, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Robert D. Scott wrote: > Normally you need to contact the entity you cannot reach, and they will open > a ticket backwards through MilNet. This is the only process I have been able > to get to work. Well, some of our customers try to send mails to them without success,

Re: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Marc Powell
On May 19, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Robert D. Scott wrote: > Normally you need to contact the entity you cannot reach, and they will open > a ticket backwards through MilNet. This is the only process I have been able > to get to work. This has been my experience as well when we discovered many .mil ins

RE: eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Robert D. Scott
Normally you need to contact the entity you cannot reach, and they will open a ticket backwards through MilNet. This is the only process I have been able to get to work. Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu Senior Network Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone CNS - Network Services

eur.army.mil net ops contact?

2010-05-19 Thread Malte von dem Hagen
Hi there, I need to get in contact with someone from (eur.)army.mil network operations staff, since they seem to block our whole AS. Any hints how to reach them? TIA && rgds, Malte -- Malte von dem Hagen Teamleitung Network Engineering & Operation Abteilung Technik