On Jun 2, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
2. I agree completely that the new entity should be completely transparent
to the members. This is a good idea. However, I have seen major problems
with this in the past, where the original entity was unwilling to meet the
new
-Original Message-
From: Pete Templin [mailto:peteli...@templin.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:31 PM
To: joel jaeggli
Cc: nanog-futures@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Transition update
joel jaeggli wrote:
Um insofar as I'm aware Andy Rosenzweig is still the Marit
On 2010-06-03, at 13:00, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
Personally, I think this is preferable to multiple back and forth
discussions on the -futures list, given that there is a lot of overlap
of questions and concerns that can all be addressed in one shot when we
all meet face to face.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@hopcount.ca]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:41 AM
To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Cc: Pete Templin; joel jaeggli; nanog-futures@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Transition update
On 2010-06-03, at 13:00, Michael K. Smith -
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
For those who will not be able to attend and hear the update in person
(e.g. we have a root zone to sign), it'd be nice to know that there will be
Bah! Its as if there would be some kind of negative security connotation for
Hi
Any one working with Alcatel Lucent equipment 7750 SR-12/7/1.
Any issues with it?
Specifically in ATM.
Thanks
Uri
Work with the product. No issues so far, very solid.
On Jun 3, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Uri Joskovitch
uri.joskovi...@telrad.com wrote:
Hi
Any one working with Alcatel Lucent equipment 7750 SR-12/7/1.
Any issues with it?
Specifically in ATM.
Thanks
Uri
Hi.
Could someone from NTT Communications Japan contact me off-ist regarding
NTT's IPv6 Transition Consultancy ?
--
Best regards,
Egor Zimin
We are putting it through the paces preparing for our migration from ATM to
MPLS. We're using the 7750 SRc12 (former 7710) and 7705 SAR8 and building
A-Pipes to interconnect with existing 7470s. Works well, stable, no issues
thus far.
Drop me a line off list if you would like to discuss further.
Please don't reply to someone else's message to start a new thread, it
causes your thread to appear under the thread you're replying to.
If you're going to start a new topic it's better to actually create a
new message.
Thanks,
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history
Hi All,
If anyone out there has any pro/con experience with the Force10 E1200i or
S50 in a large environment I'd really appreciate your thoughts. I'm
comparing them against the Juniper EX8200 and EX4200 respectively and
curious about hardware/software stability on both brands. Off-list
I am looking for a management tool which can support BGP Communities/MPLS Tags.
And also support conflicting address space uniqued by MPLS RD/RT tags. (For
layer3 VPNs).
Any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: D C [mailto:cassel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 June 2010 1:08 a.m.
To:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Adam LaFountain wrote:
If anyone out there has any pro/con experience with the Force10 E1200i or
S50 in a large environment I'd really appreciate your thoughts.
Those are totally different animals, they don't even run the same code :)
E1200 is a large chassis switch,
Hi,
As part of some ongoing collaborative research work in looking at the dark
traffic in IPv6, APNIC has requested AARNet to originate a supernet
advertisement of the IPv6 prefix 2400::/12 for the next two weeks. The
originating AS is AS7575. We would appreciate it if you could adjust your
Thanks for the info. Much appreciated.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Gabriel Somlo gso...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're interested in looking at it from a campus/enterprise point
of view, we recently reworked our DNS/Anycast setup, and here are the
deployment notes:
15 matches
Mail list logo
