To emphasise more this subject, the technical support HP Procurve is
providing (for free) is more consumer level and in my opinion is one of the
key differentiators from teams like Cisco TAC. Here is a short laundry list
of my experience:
For an example a typical phone call to their help desk
I would add the following to FLAIM
- ranonymize from Argus
http://www.qosient.com/argus/anonymization.htm
- Anontools
http://www.ics.forth.gr/dcs/Activities/Projects/anontool.html
- CPAN IP::Anonymous
http://search.cpan.org/~jtk/IP-Anonymous-0.04/lib/IP/Anonymous.pm
But I'm not sure if all of
depending on your vendor equipment you'll need an ACL or a route map to define
the traffic you wish to Nat and apply it to the 'nat engine'.
if you are doing this on cisco ASA or similar it might look something like this:
-define the interesting traffic with an ACL:
access-list 110 permit
Registered but unrouted would include space that is in use in large
private networks that aren't visible from your standard sources for
route views, such as U.S. DoD (6, 11, 22, 26, 28, 29, 30 /8) or U.K.
MoD (25/8).
Have you verified each of these address ranges or are you just a mindless
Ok cool. That is similar to what I have. Thank you.
--
Sent using BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Greg Whynott greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca
To: Mike Ruiz mr...@lstfinancial.com; nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sat Jun 19 11:02:48 2010
Subject: RE: NAT
I just checked all those /8's none of them are in the table.
-jim
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dillon wavetos...@googlemail.com
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:39:07
To: Lee Howardl...@asgard.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org; Todd
In article
aanlktimtdz5uo8v8obc7cxgmnodahqzjahqbetmuw...@mail.gmail.com, Matthew
Petach mpet...@netflight.com writes
After all with a world population of 7 billion, you certainly can't
have Internet [...] for everyone with only 4 billion IP addresses,
unless you put a *lot* of NAT in place.
-Original Message-
From: Roland Perry [mailto:li...@internetpolicyagency.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:11 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Kill Switch.
In article
aanlktimtdz5uo8v8obc7cxgmnodahqzjahqbetmuw...@mail.gmail.com,
Matthew
Petach
odd.. two of them are in my table... which table are you using
Jim?
--bill
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 05:09:57PM +, deles...@gmail.com wrote:
I just checked all those /8's none of them are in the table.
-jim
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
On 6/19/2010 17:46, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
[Tomas L. Byrnes] The issue is more that everyone who DOES have access
has more than one device, and that many of those devices move around. I
won't get into the NAT breaks the Internet war, but it certainly does
limit the type of applications you
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:46:37 -0700
Tomas L. Byrnes t...@byrneit.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Roland Perry [mailto:li...@internetpolicyagency.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:11 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Kill Switch.
In article
11 matches
Mail list logo
