On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote:
On 7/2/10 8:29 PM, Simon Lyall wrote:
Unless people serious intended for the organisation to have regular [1]
meetings outside of North America (which I doubt) then it should retain
the current general name and focus.
On 3 Jul 2010, at 04:29, Simon Lyall wrote:
Unless people serious intended for the organisation to have regular [1]
meetings outside of North America (which I doubt)
No, don't. The rest of the world already has $regionNOG. If Nanog becaome
WorldNOG, someone would make, err, NANOG again.
On 7/2/2010 10:47 PM, Jared Geiger wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Adam Rothschild
asr+na...@latency.netasr%2bna...@latency.net
wrote:
How many co-lo centers do they operate and where are they ? - Curiosity
on my part.
Todd
Here in the New York Metro, XO's collocation offering is
I haven't seen much traffic on this list about Mikrotik or RouterOS,
but I thought it was worth a shot as a last ditch effort to get this
going.
Does anyone know of a solution to connect a POS OC-3 to a router
running Mikrotik's RouterOS? I have searched google extensively with
varying phrases
On 7/3/10 10:43 AM, Alan Bryant wrote:
I haven't seen much traffic on this list about Mikrotik or RouterOS,
but I thought it was worth a shot as a last ditch effort to get this
going.
Does anyone know of a solution to connect a POS OC-3 to a router
running Mikrotik's RouterOS? I have
Alan Bryant wrote:
I haven't seen much traffic on this list about Mikrotik or RouterOS,
but I thought it was worth a shot as a last ditch effort to get this
going.
Does anyone know of a solution to connect a POS OC-3 to a router
running Mikrotik's RouterOS? I have searched google extensively
On 7/3/10 12:22 PM, Mike wrote:
Alan Bryant wrote:
I haven't seen much traffic on this list about Mikrotik or RouterOS,
but I thought it was worth a shot as a last ditch effort to get this
going.
Does anyone know of a solution to connect a POS OC-3 to a router
running Mikrotik's RouterOS? I
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Mike mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote:
Mikrotik is great at lower end stuff where you have ethernet interfaces.
Real POS OC-3 however, ain't in it's repertory and would not be what I would
choose to route at those interfaces/speeds. However, if you must
Mike,
Check out http://www.usedcisco.com they have some good prices.
--
Christopher Young
InterMetro Communications
NOC Department
imc...@intermetro.net
866-4IMCNOC, (866) 446-2662
805-433-8000 Main
805-433-0050 Direct
805-433-2589 Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bryant
Alan Bryant wrote:
I'm just trying to see what options there are and make the decision
off of that. If Cisco or Juniper is the only way, then so be it. I
just want to be sure.
The real issue is that these legacy telco interfaces are just expensive,
straight up, and being forced to use
Subject: RE: Inquiries to Acquire IPs Date: Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:40:07PM
-0500 Quoting Aaron Wendel (aa...@wholesaleinternet.net):
I sent an inquiry in to ARIN yesterday for a certain ASN that was available
and was told that management won't allow them to issue requested numbers. :(
RIPE
Vanity ASNs are a horrible idea, IMHO... Unless you want WIPO to come in and
start
applying UDRP to IP addresses and ASNs, I suggest this be avoided.
Owen
On Jul 3, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Mans Nilsson wrote:
Subject: RE: Inquiries to Acquire IPs Date: Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:40:07PM
-0500
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 12:22 -0700, Mike wrote:
Mikrotik is great at lower end stuff where you have ethernet
interfaces.
Real POS OC-3 however, ain't in it's repertory and would not
be what I
would choose to route at those interfaces/speeds.
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 10:42:55PM +0200, Mans Nilsson wrote:
aut-num:AS31337
as-name:ELEET-AS
descr: ELEET Network
descr: Location: Sweden
(Story is, IIRC, that adjacent number was assigned initially, but the
confirmation mail was answered with Can I
I really wouldn't use the word legacy to describe SONET and OC-3's.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 4:11 PM
To: Alan Bryant
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mikrotik OC-3 Connection
Alan Bryant wrote:
I'm
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 07:32:48PM -0400, Scott Berkman wrote:
I really wouldn't use the word legacy to describe SONET and OC-3's.
It's around 25 years old (work started in 1985, first standards
published in 1988) and we now have a ratified 100G Ethernet standard.
Much of it is
On 7/3/2010 17:12, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 07:32:48PM -0400, Scott Berkman wrote:
I really wouldn't use the word legacy to describe SONET and OC-3's.
It's around 25 years old (work started in 1985, first standards
published in 1988) and we now have a ratified 100G
Ok, scenario time.
I've found a 7206VXR\NPE-G1 w/ 256MB RAM.
It has the 3 onboard GigE ports and a PA-POS-1OC3 card in it that
should be fine for our OC-3 connection.
We need a total of 5 Ethernet ports, not necessarily all GigE. I found
this card, PA-2FE-TX that would give us 2 10/100 ports.
Do you plan on getting full BGP routes from your upstream? If so, go
with 1Gb of ram on the NPE G1.
I believe that IOS 12.4.25c is the latest version for the 7200VXR
series. It's stable, been running it for quite some time. Depending on
what you will be doing with this router, will depend
I believe that IOS 12.4.25c is the latest version for the 7200VXR
series. It's stable, been running it for quite some time. Depending
on
what you will be doing with this router, will depend on what feature
set
you'll want. I typically use the Service Provider IOS with IPSEC, 3DES
and
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 05:12:14PM -0700, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 07:32:48PM -0400, Scott Berkman wrote:
I really wouldn't use the word legacy to describe SONET and OC-3's.
It's around 25 years old (work started in 1985, first standards
published in 1988) and we
12.4 Service provider has IPv6 and OSPFv3.
On 7/3/2010 8:09 PM, Ray Burkholder wrote:
I believe that IOS 12.4.25c is the latest version for the 7200VXR
series. It's stable, been running it for quite some time. Depending
on
what you will be doing with this router, will depend on what feature
Butch Evans wrote:
More functionality from a Cisco? You MUST be joking. MT (and
ImageStream for that matter) can do WAY more than Cisco for a
fraction
of the price. Both will offer a much better firewall option,
infinitely
better QOS
The 15.0 series is available for the 7200VXR. However, unless I'm missing
something, note that the Service Provider version doesn't have OSPFv3 for
IPv6.
is-is
On 7/3/2010 18:32, Scott Berkman wrote:
I really wouldn't use the word legacy to describe SONET and OC-3's.
The word legacy is applied to any product that has actually shipped
25 matches
Mail list logo
