I have a cisco cmts that forwards dhcp requests to an ISC dhcp server.
I have a working configuration for this. I am trying to set up ISC
DHCPD so that it can handle multiple shared-networks. I cannot seem to
get this working correctly. If there is an expert in the house who
can offer me a few
Just pay attention to MTU with GRE tunnel and packet fragmentation.
--
Luca Simonetti
Engine Networks
http://www.enginenetworks.net
Datacenter GENEVA 1: Rue de la Confédération, 6 1204 Geneve - CH
Datacenter ZURICH 1: Josefstrasse, 225 - 8005 Zürich - CH
Datacenter MILAN 1: Caldera,
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:46:24 EDT, J. Oquendo said:
RFP anyone.. Botnet Mitigation for Networks surely collectively it would
and CAN work.
A nice idea, but consider if a more automated tool/system was created to
behead a botnet (50,000 null0
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:57:15 PDT, Henry Linneweh said:
Your definitions seem to be rather ATM-specific, which may be a bit of a
problem in a world dominated by Ethernet...
Can we get a consensus definition on these definition's and what hardware
vender's make edge routers and what hardware
Sean Donelan wrote:
Damned if they do, Damned if they don't.
It seems like every 4-6 weeks people alternate between ISPs are bad
because they don't try to prevent X, Y or Z; and then 4-6 weeks later
ISPs are bad because they tried to prevent A, B or C. It doesn't matter
what A, B, C or X,
I got a router, it's got 5-6 10GE interfaces talking to other routers on
my network backbone, and a bunch of 10GE links to end-user-facing aggregation
switches. Since it's only forwarding inside my network, it's a core router
by your definition.
I now turn up an identical hardware 10GE link
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 02:24:06 pm Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
(and I'm all for FreeBSD boxes, don't get me wrong, the whole point
of this discussion is that either you're doing hardware forwarding
and you're pretty safe [unfortunately often with a lot of caveats,
but still], or you're
Root Zone DNSSEC Deployment
Technical Status Update 2010-07-16
This is the twelfth of a series of technical status updates intended
to inform a technical audience on progress in signing the root zone
of the DNS.
RESOURCES
Details of the project, including documentation published to date,
can
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 02:40:50 pm Michael Holstein wrote:
Why is it that network operators can't work together
on instances like this and have a botnet killswitch
Trust (or lack thereof).
That's certainly one of the biggest non-technical reasons. Others go by the
acronyms NIH and
In a message written on Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:35:39PM +, Joe Abley wrote:
The transition from Deliberately-Unvalidatable Root Zone (DURZ) to
production signed root zone took place on 2010-07-15 at 2050 UTC. The
first full production signed root zone had SOA serial 2010071501. There
have
Wonderful news!
Leo Bicknell wrote:
Perhaps you could explain why the keys are being made available in
formats that, as far as I can tell, no nameserver software on the
planet uses? Pretty much 100% of the users will need a conversion
from one of the 6 formats you provided, when you could have provided
6
Once upon a time, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org said:
Perhaps you could explain why the keys are being made available in
formats that, as far as I can tell, no nameserver software on the
planet uses? Pretty much 100% of the users will need a conversion
from one of the 6 formats you provided,
At 7:53 -0700 7/16/10, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Perhaps you could explain why the keys are being made available in
formats that, as far as I can tell, no nameserver software on the
planet uses?
(My guess:)
There's no standard input format for name servers, especially
regarding configuration
On Jul 16, 2010, at 6:02 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
1/4 plastic tubing -
http://www.waterfiltermart.com/images/products/preview/plastic_tubing_and_nut.jpg
garden hose -
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Garden_hose.jpg/800px-Garden_hose.jpg
fire hose -
On 7/16/10 6:02 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:57:15 PDT, Henry Linneweh said:
Can we get a consensus definition on these definition's and what hardware
vender's make edge routers and what hardware vender's make core routers.
I got a router, it's got 5-6 10GE
Cisco has VSS (on 6500 class) and H3C has IRF; allowing you to virtualize 2
or more physical switches/routers in an active/active configuration where you
can use all links and terminate LACP aggregates between the two devices. Is
anyone using this or similar technology from another vendor?
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Chris Adams wrote:
A simple XSLT will transform it into any needed format.
XSLT can't turn root-anchors.xml into the DNSKEY RR that BIND requires.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/
TYNE DOGGER FISHER: SOUTHERLY VEERING WESTERLY 5 TO 7, DECREASING
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG and
the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical
On 7/16/10 11:07 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Chris Adams wrote:
A simple XSLT will transform it into any needed format.
XSLT can't turn root-anchors.xml into the DNSKEY RR that BIND requires.
Tony.
anchors2keys will.
Once upon a time, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at said:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Chris Adams wrote:
A simple XSLT will transform it into any needed format.
XSLT can't turn root-anchors.xml into the DNSKEY RR that BIND requires.
That sounds like a problem with BIND then. :-)
--
Chris Adams
Thanks for all the people that replied off list, asking me to send them
responses i will get.
I got nothing other than :
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog24/abstracts.php?pt=OTM1Jm5hbm9nMjQ=nm=nanog24
and
Network Management- Accounting and Performance Strategies - Just the first
three
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 02:10 -0500, Butch Evans wrote:
I have a cisco cmts that forwards dhcp requests to an ISC dhcp server.
I have a working configuration for this. I am trying to set up ISC
DHCPD so that it can handle multiple shared-networks. I cannot seem to
get this working correctly.
I believe, myself included, are hesitant to answer because it really
depends upon a lot of variables. Type of business your NOC is running,
the operating budget, number of racks, etc.
The details matter when narrowing things down.
But yes, I have seen this ITIL
http://www.frontrange.com/
click
BGP Update Report
Interval: 08-Jul-10 -to- 15-Jul-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS30890 249855 14.3% 577.0 -- EVOLVA Evolva Telecom s.r.l.
2 - AS24400 45751
This report has been generated at Fri Jul 16 21:11:34 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 7/16/10 11:07 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Chris Adams wrote:
A simple XSLT will transform it into any needed format.
XSLT can't turn root-anchors.xml into the DNSKEY RR that BIND requires.
anchors2keys
Yeah oops.
Just noticed that
Joel's iPad
On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 7/16/10 11:07 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Chris Adams wrote:
A simple XSLT will transform
On Jul 16, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
I'm sure the collective wisdom here is capable of pulling the task off at
least in theory;
The thorniest issues aren't technology-related, per se; they're legal exposure
(both real and imagined), regulatory concerns (both real and imagined),
29 matches
Mail list logo
