On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 02:54:13AM -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
gin-nto-icore1 is a Tata router at Equinix in NY. Whether or not that
port belongs to Comcast is anyone's guess.
From Tata's looking glass:
3 Vlan550.icore1.NTO-NewYork.as6453.net (209.58.26.78) 4 msec
* Richard A Steenbergen
FWIW these graphs pretty much reflect the massive congestion that I've
been observing between Tata and Comcast. I've also seen some third party
Smokeping graphs which visually show the rate of loss, and the pattern
looks very very similar, but I'll let someone who
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Sam Stickland wrote:
But there's no need for AQM, just smaller buffers would make a huge
difference.
Well, yes, buffering packets more than let's say 30-50ms on a 1 meg link
doesn't make much sense. But doing some basic AQM would make things even
better (some packets
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Backdoor Santa
backdoorsan...@hotmail.com wrote:
Ever wonder what Comcast's connections to the Internet look like? In the
tradition of WikiLeaks, someone stumbled upon these graphs of their TATA
links. For reference, TATA is the only other IP transit provider
Thanks for this, I think, as a residential customer of Comcast, the FCC
and FTC will both be receiving a letter from me. Clearly Comcast is not
making an effort to deliver their advertised service, and instead are
actually degrading my service.
Cordially
Patrick
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Rettke, Brian brian.ret...@cableone.bizwrote:
I don't see anything listed that indicates operation that is at all
different from any other service provider network.
Yeah, the 30 day looks like a classic uptick in traffic toward the holidays.
Some bellhead
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Sam Stickland wrote:
But there's no need for AQM, just smaller buffers would make a huge
difference.
Well, yes, buffering packets more than let's say 30-50ms on a 1 meg
link
doesn't make much sense. But doing some basic AQM would make things
even
better (some
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, George Bonser wrote:
that sort of delay. Some form of AQM is probably a good thing as would
be the wider use of ECN. Finding out that a buffer filled and a packet
(or many packets) was dropped five seconds after the fact, isn't going
ECN pretty much needs WRED, and then
Hi All,
Apologies if off topic, but hoping that one of you gurus out there might have
some tips on this.
I have a rather unusual application for DNS which I need to figure out a way
to make it work, but running into authority issues.
Basically, I have a fake server running on a private
Google’s Huge Change and How it affects you.
•Anyone can now post bad reviews and kill your rank.
•We post good reviews and improve your rank.
•We post good reviews to keep others from killing your rank.
Google: Judge, Jury and Online Shopping Executioner
Google rank is based on
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:22:00PM +0100, Leland Vandervort wrote:
Hi All,
Apologies if off topic, but hoping that one of you gurus out there might have
some tips on this.
I have a rather unusual application for DNS which I need to figure
out a way to make it work, but running into
Backdoor Santa wrote:
Ever wonder what Comcast's connections to the Internet look like? In the
tradition of WikiLeaks, someone stumbled upon these graphs of their TATA links.
For reference, TATA is the only other IP transit provider to Comcast after
Level (3). Comcast is a customer of TATA
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:24:45 -0500, Craig L Uebringer
cluebrin...@gmail.com wrote:
Same crap I've seen on loads of provider networks.
No ISP I've ever worked for or with has ever willingly ran their transit
(or peering) links at capacity.
(Granted, I've been responsible for saturating
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:24:45AM -0500, Craig L Uebringer wrote:
Yeah, the 30 day looks like a classic uptick in traffic toward the
holidays. Some bellhead beancounter maybe took out capacity in the
summer lull and ignored the engineers. Or they just have stupidly-slow
install
To what end? And who's calling the shots there these days? Comcast has
been nothing but shady for the last couple years. Spoofing resets, The L3
issue, etc. What's the speculation on the end game?
From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:r...@e-gerbil.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Hello All:
This Friday morning, December 17, at 5:00 a.m. EST, Merit staff will relocate
the server that operates the NANOG mailing lists and website. This will result
in a list outage that should last not more than two hours. If you have any
questions, please send them to adm...@nanog.org.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:39:07PM -0600, Aaron Wendel wrote:
To what end? And who's calling the shots there these days? Comcast
has been nothing but shady for the last couple years. Spoofing
resets, The L3 issue, etc. What's the speculation on the end game?
I believe Comcast has made
Can you share any references on this? Everything I've seen has been
typical lawyer double speak, i.e. the opposite of clear.
On 12/14/2010 5:38 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
I believe Comcast has made clear their position that they feel content
providers should be paying them for access to
On 12/14/10 2:38 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:39:07PM -0600, Aaron Wendel wrote:
To what end? And who's calling the shots there these days? Comcast
has been nothing but shady for the last couple years. Spoofing
resets, The L3 issue, etc. What's the
On 12/14/2010 15:23, Douglas Otis wrote:
On 12/14/10 2:38 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:39:07PM -0600, Aaron Wendel wrote:
To what end? And who's calling the shots there these days? Comcast
has been nothing but shady for the last couple years. Spoofing
I'm surprised that no one seems to think that bandwidth is really just a
series of interconnects. If indeed their links are saturated, they are probably
either near an upgrade point (if their forecasting was correct) or trying to
negotiate one (if their forecasting is bad or there is a sudden
On 12/8/10 6:30 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Yes, but this obviously completes the 'DDoS attack' and sends the signal that
the bully will win.
it's part of a valid mitigation strategy. shifting the target out from
underneath the blackholed address is also part of the activity. that's
easier in some
As I'm attempting to lay out in my posts, there are are a plethora of
problems, end-to-end in the network. Would that there was only one problem.
Excessive, unmanaged buffers afflict the user's OS's (Windows, Mac and
Linux alike), particularly on recent hardware. Home routers and the
I just see this as a natural progression of what happens of a single
player with a captive audience due to mergers and attrition. They know
their customers aren't going anywhere. The only way to fix it would be
to go back to the days when there were a bunch of competing local
providers.
Wait
On Dec 14, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I just see this as a natural progression of what happens of a single
player with a captive audience due to mergers and attrition. They know
their customers aren't going anywhere. The only way to fix it would be
to go back to the days when
From: Jared Mauch
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style
This requires one or more of the following:
o regulatory action
o last mile regulation or competitive access
o subsidies for new players
o massive capital outlays
- Original Message -
From: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com
If monopolies are needed in order to get service to an area, make them
last mile wire monopolies that provide no content of their own and
allow the content providers (Comcast, Verizon, ATT, etc.) provide
service over the
- Original Message -
From: Alex Rubenstein a...@corp.nac.net
-- Alex, remembering the days of 8000 ISP's with substantially better
customer service than is available today
In 1995, when I was the chief engineer for a teeny little ISP called
Centurion Technologies, in Largo FL (we had
I come across this interesting link.
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4828tag=nl.e036
Is ICANN really that susceptible to govt. pressure?
I only see chaos ahead specially with ipv6 coming into the scene.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:20:17PM -0600, Beavis said:
I come across this interesting link.
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4828tag=nl.e036
Is ICANN really that susceptible to govt. pressure?
Funny, tho - being succeptible to govt pressure CREATES an alt root DNS
On Dec 14, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Beavis wrote:
I come across this interesting link.
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4828tag=nl.e036
http://domainincite.com/icann-had-no-role-in-seizing-torrent-domains/
Is ICANN really that susceptible to govt. pressure?
Ignoring the fact that
we'll if ICANN't .. maybe HECANN (*trying out humor*).
this idea of second internet doesn't make sense.
icann alone is already a handful.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Ken k...@sizone.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:20:17PM -0600, Beavis said:
I come across this interesting link.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557
This appears to be some serious FUD, but if true could have some serious
implications for IPSEC stacks in all kinds of equipment.
-wil
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Beavis pfu...@gmail.com wrote:
I come across this interesting link.
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4828tag=nl.e036
Is ICANN really that susceptible to govt. pressure?
I only see chaos ahead specially with ipv6 coming into the scene.
ICANN is
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Wil Schultz wschu...@bsdboy.com wrote:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557
This appears to be some serious FUD, but if true could have some serious
implications for IPSEC stacks in all kinds of equipment.
-wil
Does anyone remember the last
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:39:02PM -0800, Chaim Rieger said:
Does anyone remember the last time a law enforcement agency had
someone sign a 10 year NDA on a backdoor?
Oh, times up, I can post it on Facebook now. Cool.
22:42 @smartboy curious what the guy's motives really are. pretty
Earlier this evening ISOC-NY hosted a talk Nations and Networks by
Milton Mueller
http://www.livestream.com/isocny/video?clipId=pla_3df8a3b8-e2ee-489d-82d2-d5fb7fc432ef
At one point, he said that he'd had conversations with government
insiders about their cracking of the whip on ICANN on matters
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Brandon Kim brandon@brandontek.com
wrote:
I want to know if there's software out there that will encrypt files on
win2k3, winxp, win7, so that if someone decides to steal the computer
and plug the harddrive into a USB external case, they won't be able
to
On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:56 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:39:02PM -0800, Chaim Rieger said:
Does anyone remember the last time a law enforcement agency had
someone sign a 10 year NDA on a backdoor?
Oh, times up, I can post it on Facebook now. Cool.
22:42 @smartboy curious
39 matches
Mail list logo
