Hello,
I've got a bunch of sites connected to the Verizon Private IP MPLS service,
and recently brought online a location in Anchorage connected to the
brand-new PE node in the same city.
I'm seeing that packets marked as DSCP EF are given fantastic treatment (low
jitter, no packet loss), but
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:08:39AM -0800, JC Dill wrote:
On 22/02/11 10:38 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
The other CERT: Community Emergency Response Team.
https://www.citizencorps.gov/cert/about.shtm
+1 for CERT. I also think that taking a CERT class is a great way to
re-evaluate your own
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, lists lists wrote:
I'm seeing that packets marked as DSCP EF are given fantastic treatment (low
jitter, no packet loss), but other packets, including AF41, AF31, and BE are
given what appears to be the junk bucket treatment.
Hah, just a few days ago I spoke with an
You have products like a cell on wheels. A container containing a phone switch
and a mobile cell, easily installable. You place it at the center of the
disaster zone and all mobile phones start to work...
if you are worried about congestion, then only the right sims are
registered/enabled.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Brandon Ross br...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, lists lists wrote:
I'm seeing that packets marked as DSCP EF are given fantastic treatment
(low
jitter, no packet loss), but other packets, including AF41, AF31, and BE
are
given what appears to be
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Brandon Ross br...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, lists lists wrote:
I'm seeing that packets marked as DSCP EF are given fantastic treatment
(low
jitter, no packet loss), but other packets, including AF41, AF31, and BE
are
given what appears to be
Pacnet have a nice cable running under the actual SF Bay you could borrow a
bit of. Don't think people would mind.
;)
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Chris Woodfield rek...@semihuman.comwrote:
Hi,
Was wondering where one in the SF Bay area might be able to borrow (or
otherwise procure
How do you define infrastructure addresses in your network?
Ok, probably router loopbacks are some of them. Router LANs also.
But what about addresses used on WAN (or LAN p2p) links that are used
for interconnections with customers?
What about addresses used for public servers (dns, mail, web,
- Original Message -
From: mikea mi...@mikea.ath.cx
I diffidently suggest that amateur radio licensing, together with some
battery-operated gear (think 2-meter or 70-cm handy-talkies at a minimum
for short-haul comms, HF gear for longer-haul) may be Very Good Indeed
in a disaster
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
ach...@forthnet.gr wrote:
How do you define infrastructure addresses in your network?
Ok, probably router loopbacks are some of them. Router LANs also.
But what about addresses used on WAN (or LAN p2p) links that are used for
I consider anything not facing the customer to be infrastructure. In
terms of CPE, routers, etc. If it's a point to point connection
(t1,wireless,etc) the address on the router on my end facing the customer
router is considered a customer address.
Justin
--
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
Aol
The problem with this is that both ARES and RACES hams have gotten there
first (orange lights and strobes flashing) and are now engaged in
small-arms fire over who gets to set their repeater up. You're now
hiding under your vehicle. What is your next move?
Andrew
On 2/24/2011 10:03 AM, Franck
The problem with this is that both ARES and RACES hams have gotten there
first (orange lights and strobes flashing) and are now engaged in small-arms
fire over who gets to set their repeater up. You're now hiding under your
vehicle. What is your next move?
Larger-arms fire?
On 02/24/2011 11:33 AM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
The problem with this is that both ARES and RACES hams have gotten there
first (orange lights and strobes flashing) and are now engaged in
small-arms fire over who gets to set their repeater up. You're now
hiding under your vehicle. What is your
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:26:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
Subject: Re: Christchurch New Zealand
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
snip
The *real* problem is getting petty politics out of
local ARES/RACES orgs.
Cheers,
-- jra
Here's my $0.02 on the subject of hams for
like today. I included a snapshot of yesterday below
as well.
I've included a more detailed report of the prefixes observed involved here:
http://puck.nether.net/~jared/tata-leak-20110224.txt
This seems to be a somewhat common event for 6453, loking through the history
of data available
On 2/24/2011 13:01, Jima wrote:
Wait for a winner to prevail. Whoever comes out on top is clearly more
prepared to deal with emergencies.
http://www.hamsexy.com
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net
The old pin--through-the-center-of-the coax trick while you go on setting up
your repeater? :)
73's,
Mike
KE6MRE
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Andrew Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote:
The problem with this is that both ARES and RACES hams have gotten there
first (orange lights and strobes
FWIW, in my experience, when ARES and RACES both arrive on a scene
together, they rarely get into small arms fire over any thing, rather,
preferring
to work together to help each other set up both repeaters and to coordinate
which parts of the workload will be handled by which operation in order
Does anyone know if there is a route-server for AS 20001 available? All I can
find is TW (4323).
Thomas Magill
Network Engineer
Office: (858) 909-3777
Cell: (858) 869-9685
mailto:tmag...@providecommerce.com
provide-commerce
4840 Eastgate Mall
San Diego, CA 92121
I'm glad someone said something nice about Radio Hams on this thread
(which started as being about Christchurch!) or i'd have risked polluting
Christchurch's good rep with all this noise about whackers!
FWIW AREC (NZ's ARES equivalent) are active in Christchurch, mainly on
VHF, though there's
Hello,
I am looking for industry standard parameters to base the SLA of one
network regarding to voice, video and data application.
Which are the the accepted values for jiiter, delay, latency and
packet loss for voice, video and data in a IP/MPLS ?
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
of the data show (for today so far) a few thousand of leaks
more than is normal for a day like today. I included a snapshot of yesterday
below as well.
I've included a more detailed report of the prefixes observed involved here:
http://puck.nether.net/~jared/tata-leak-20110224.txt
On Feb 24, 2011, at 18:43, Thomas Magill tmag...@providecommerce.com wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a route-server for AS 20001 available? All I
can find is TW (4323).
I believe as20001 is a stub AS behind as7843.
Of course, I do not think as7843 has a looking glass.
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Feb 24, 2011, at 7:50 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Can't say if it was a leak or de aggregation, but TATA announcements to
us jumped from about 70,000 to almost 190,000 for a while today, then
dropped back down.
It very much appears to be a leak based on the route-views MRT format updates.
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
FWIW, in my experience, when ARES and RACES both arrive on a scene
together, they rarely get into small arms fire over any thing, rather,
preferring to work together to help each other set up both repeaters and to
coordinate
I'd be looking at packet ordering perhaps for voice and esp video,
having the packets arrive in order makes a huge difference for video
On Friday, 25 February 2011, Diogo Montagner diogo.montag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for industry standard parameters to base the SLA of one
27 matches
Mail list logo
