i am more of a pessimist. i suspect that there will be enough
v4-only destinations out there that multi-homed enterprises fronting
onto dual-stack backbones will announce teenie bits of v4 so they can
nat64.
that teenie bit better be part of a larger aggregate that can reach at
least one of
On 3/9/11 12:35 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
i am more of a pessimist. i suspect that there will be enough
v4-only destinations out there that multi-homed enterprises fronting
onto dual-stack backbones will announce teenie bits of v4 so they can
nat64.
that teenie bit better be part of a larger
Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org writes:
Now that I have mitigated the bufferbloat disaster in my home cable
service via bandwidth shaping, Skype works sooo much better for
me. This is what devices such as Ooma are doing. Unfortunately, it
means you have to defeat features such as Comcast's
one of these curves is steeper than the other.
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/plota?file=%2fvar%2fdata%2fbgp%2fv6%2fas2.0%2fbgp-active%2etxtdescr=Active%20BGP%20entries%20%28FIB%29ylabel=Active%20BGP%20entries%20%28FIB%29with=step
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
one of these curves is steeper than the other.
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/plota?file=%2fvar%2fdata%2fbgp%2fv6%2fas2.0%2fbgp-active%2etxtdescr=Active%20BGP%20entries%20%28FIB%29ylabel=Active%20BGP%20entries%20%28FIB%29with=step
Sure you all know this already:
http://google.com/ncr
Temp fix for getting the .com version.
G
-Original Message-
From: Mark Keymer [mailto:m...@viviotech.net]
Sent: 04 March 2011 06:14
To: Raymond Macharia
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Interesting google redirects.
On this same
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 07:37 -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
...well, kind of. What you don't mention is that it was thought to be
ugly and rejected solely on the aesthetic grounds. Which is somewhat
different from being rejected because it cannot work.
No. It was rejected because
On 9 Mar 2011, at 07:18, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
one of these curves is steeper than the other.
That's what we wanted for the first one.
On 3/8/11 2:32 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:37:27 EST, Steven Bellovin said:
No. It was rejected because routers tended to melt down into quivering
puddles of silicon from seeing many packets with IP options set -- a fast
trip to the slow path. It also
Chris,
With address exhaustion and deaggregation, the table is only going to
get bigger so choosing anything now that can only handle anything
south of 1M routes is not a wise investment.
Several posters have recommended ASR1002 and MX80. I use both of these
platforms in my environment and have
On Mar 9, 2011, at 12:43 AM, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:44:05PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
i am more of a pessimist. i suspect that there will be enough v4-only
destinations out there that multi-homed enterprises fronting onto
dual-stack backbones will announce teenie
Hi
I read ipv6forum.pdf about ipv6
It said
MTU must be at least 1280 bytes (1500+)
Does it mean to set the mtu over 1500
I set my linux box eth0 as 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 but I can't ping it
inet6 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 scope global tentative
ls it this problem? Thank you
# ping6
On 3/9/2011 8:41 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi
I read ipv6forum.pdf about ipv6
It said
MTU must be at least 1280 bytes (1500+)
Does it mean to set the mtu over 1500
No, it simply means that the minimum MTU for IPv6 is 1280.
I set my linux box eth0 as 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 but I can't
On Mar 9, 2011, at 00:35 MST, Igor Gashinsky wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Randy Bush wrote:
:: a real use for the diffserv bits! why not flowlabel in 6? it's been
:: looking for a use for a decade.
Honestly, we figured flowlabel might actually find a use before all the
values of diffserv
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:19 AM, George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
The ipv4-ipv6-2 CAM profile in 5.1 gives 768K v4 routes and 64k v6
routes which should be good for quite a while. That is provided you
How many IPv6 BGP routes are folks typically planning for in the DFZ
before a hardware
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:34:18 PST, Vadim Antonov said:
Steven Bellovin wrote:
And then some other dim bulb will connect one of those 5 layers to the
outside world...
Broken attribution alert - I wrote that, not Steve..
A dim bulb has infinite (and often much subtler) ways of screwing
On 3/9/11 1:55 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
one of these curves is steeper than the other.
the last serious satainc phylters died in 2001. salesmarketing
pressure. when eyecandy.com is behind a /27, or your sm folk
sell to weenie.foo who wants you to announce their /26, it will be
the end of the /24 barrier.
Sure, you can sell to someone who wants to announce a /26 and you can
On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:06 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
On 9 Mar 2011, at 07:18, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
one of these curves is steeper than the other.
That's what we wanted for the first one.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:06 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
On 9 Mar 2011, at 07:18, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
one of these curves is steeper than the other.
That's what we wanted for the first one.
Thank you everyone for the suggestions both on and off list. We will be
looking at a few additional devices along with what we have researched.
Thanks,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Bill Blackford [mailto:bblackf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:53 AM
To: Chris
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=enas_sdt=0,5cluster=6058676534328717115
@article{cittadini2010evolution,
title={{Evolution of Internet Address Space Deaggregation: Myths and
Reality}},
author={Cittadini, L. and Muhlbauer, W. and Uhlig, S. and Bush, R. and
Fran{\c{c}}ois, P.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Shane Amante wrote:
::
:: On Mar 9, 2011, at 00:35 MST, Igor Gashinsky wrote:
:: On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Randy Bush wrote:
::
:: :: a real use for the diffserv bits! why not flowlabel in 6? it's been
:: :: looking for a use for a decade.
::
:: Honestly, we figured
If anyone is listening, would you be so kind as to update geolocation
info for the following-- they are in Mexico, not Argentina.
inetnum: 186.64.16.176/29
status: reallocated
owner: Infor Global Solutions Mexico SA de CV
ownerid: MX-IGSM-LACNIC
responsible: Hector Garcia
There is no (publicly) known process for those three major sites -- if
anyone does learn, please update the wiki.
Probably the best place to start with each of those is the generic support
e-mail/web form.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Schiller, Heather A
I'd be willing to bet that's maxmind's geoip database.
for some if not all three it corroborates the argentina response...
correct...@maxmind.com
On 3/9/11 11:32 AM, Schiller, Heather A wrote:
If anyone is listening, would you be so kind as to update geolocation
info for the following--
Hi :)
I don't manage IP space day to day anymore.. But can get you in touch
w/ the folks who do. No promises, as I don't know what the issue is -
but I can try to help clear up any problem as well. ..and there really
isn't a panic over here, we've known it was coming for years.
--Heather
The implication of this statement would seem to be that the reason the
routing tables are growing is due primarily to allocations and not
deaggregation (e.g., for traffic engineering). Does anyone have any
actual data to corroborate or refute this?
Luca Cittadini, Wolfgang Mühlbauer, Steve
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:01 -0600, imNet Administrator wrote:
Where are you pinging it from? also, the 2001:db8::/32 prefix is used
for documentation purposes and might be handled differently by the
TCP/IP stack.
Works fine in Linux - I've been using it (in an isolated training room
setup) for
In message 1299711449.2109.98.camel@karl, Karl Auer writes:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:01 -0600, imNet Administrator wrote:
Where are you pinging it from? also, the 2001:db8::/32 prefix is used
for documentation purposes and might be handled differently by the
TCP/IP stack.
Works fine in
I think this is the point where I get a shovel, a bullwhip and head over to the
horse graveyard that is CAM optimization...
-C
On Mar 8, 2011, at 5:18 20PM, Chris Enger wrote:
Our Brocade reps pointed us to the CER 2000 series, and they can do up to
512k v4 or up to 128k v6. With other
I was doing some packet scanning on one of my IPv6 enabled servers and I
found traffic such as the following frequently (IPs slightly edited):
02:23:02.410360 IP6 fe80::ff78.546 ff02::2.547: dhcp6 solicit
Not having done too much ipv6 packet scanning yet I am curious to know
if this is a
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:20:12 PST, Jeroen van Aart said:
I was doing some packet scanning on one of my IPv6 enabled servers and I
found traffic such as the following frequently (IPs slightly edited):
02:23:02.410360 IP6 fe80::ff78.546 ff02::2.547: dhcp6 solicit
The addresses are not mine,
-Original Message-
From: Chris Woodfield [mailto:rek...@semihuman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 6:11 PM
To: Chris Enger
Cc: 'jgood...@studio442.com.au'; 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table
sizeconsiderations
I think this is
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:00:57PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Woodfield [mailto:rek...@semihuman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 6:11 PM
To: Chris Enger
Cc: 'jgood...@studio442.com.au'; 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 11:43 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 1299711449.2109.98.camel@karl, Karl Auer writes:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:01 -0600, imNet Administrator wrote:
Where are you pinging it from? also, the 2001:db8::/32 prefix is used
for documentation purposes and might be
No SNMP stats for virtual vlan interfaces and when asking Brocade
about it, you get told it is too hard to program. You gotta be
kiddin me
Yeah, that is something that has been bugging me. No stats on ve
interfaces.
Or how they do vlan configurations.
I have complained about that,
Good Evening all. I got an odd and somewhat crazy request from our
development group for a long haul OC48 connection for testing (they
specifically said from their office in Utah to the east coast and back)
with minimal jitter. They need to be able to run their own framing Sonet
and WDM - don't
38 matches
Mail list logo
