On Mar 19, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
As for charging for residential static assignments, I don't think it's all
that odd, or 'despicable'. Allocating static assignments consumes engineer
time
0n Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:27:18AM -0700, Jim Logajan wrote:
Loopback loopb...@digi-muse.com wrote:
Need the ability to test Network Management and Provisioning
applications over a variety of WAN link speeds from T1 equivalent up to
1GB speeds. Seems to be quite a few
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
This assumes an HFC network and not a PON or DSL topology
where it is not an issue.
It assumes that the access network topology does not employ any kind
of triangular routing to terminate the subscriber's layer-3 traffic on
a
All,
I just thought this is amusing that in CSI: New York – Season 7, Episode 17,
they do a 'Remote Desktop' hack and they enter in the following details…
http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address = Fail!
But seriously… That a major TV show
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Loopback loopb...@digi-muse.com wrote:
Need the ability to test Network Management and Provisioning applications
over a variety of WAN link speeds from T1 equivalent up to 1GB speeds.
Seems to be quite a few offerings but I am looking for recommendations from
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Loopback loopb...@digi-muse.com wrote:
Need the ability to test Network Management and Provisioning applications
over a variety of WAN link speeds from T1 equivalent up to 1GB speeds.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:44:50 +1100, Skeeve Stevens said:
http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address = Fail!
Intentional Fail, probably, similar to how most phone numbers on a TV show are
in the 555 exchange. You put a number on TV, and drunk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 20, 2011, at 6:29 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:44:50 +1100, Skeeve Stevens said:
http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Especially since 148.18 is Department of Defence - but it doesn't seem to be
routed at the moment.
...Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414
On 3/20/2011 11:44 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
All,
I just thought this is amusing that in CSI: New York – Season 7, Episode 17,
they do a 'Remote Desktop' hack and they enter in the following details…
http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address
- Original Message -
From: Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net
Is 127.0.0.1 / ::1 the Internet version of 555? Or will I hurt
myself, so now I'm going to sue you mean we can't even use that?
I'm a touch surprised that *you're* asking that question, Patrick. I
figured your chapeau
-Original Message-
From: Paul Graydon [mailto:p...@paulgraydon.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 9:02 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CSI New York fake IPv6
But seriously. That a major TV show is actually using IPv6 addressing
(or pretending to) is an awesome thing in my
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Fouant sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net
Makes a good change from a 5 octet IP number I remember them using
in one episode revolving around an adult webcam website.
I remember seeing that show. I think they had Jim Fleming on as a
consultant. ;
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
No, there are several reserved stretches of both IPv4 and DNS space
for just such reasons. example.com is the most common and well known,
but see also RFC 3330 and RFC 5737, not necessarily in that order.
See also this
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Is 127.0.0.1 / ::1 the Internet version of 555? Or will I hurt myself, so now
I'm going to sue you mean we can't even use that?
It'd be nice if TV producers even knew that not all of 555 was to be
used for television shows*, let alone that there's an internet
On 3/20/2011 4:44 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address = Fail!
But seriously… That a major TV show is actually using IPv6 addressing (or
pretending to) is an awesome thing in my opinion.
More curious, for me, is their choice of a hardware vendor: Alacron,
Inc. (
LinkedIn
Rod James Bio requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
Ted,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Rod James
Accept invitation from Rod James Bio
17 matches
Mail list logo
