Re: SBL99576 195.191.102.0/24 SR04

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, John Peach wrote: On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:17:30 -0700 (PDT) goe...@anime.net wrote: On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: as a european provider, we have no liability whatsoever for what customers do or do not do about the best reason i can think of for listing thi

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

A probable case of outsourcing core business functionality without a fully tested plan B...

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

Greetings, Just to be clear I am only looking for a scope of the issue I am seeing, its not a direct assumption of fault or mis-configuration, more so a sanity check if you will. Thanks much for all of the feed back, as I see it its not just me. Thanks again -Joe Blanchard On Tue, Mar 22, 201

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

> Guess that move to Amazon EC2 wasn't such a good idea. First reddit, > now netflix. > http://techblog.netflix.com/2010/12/four-reasons-we-choose-amazons-cloud-as.html FWIW, at $DAYJOB we haven't been able to run out a pool of a couple of dozen EC2 instances for more than two weeks (since last Ju

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Ryan Malayter wrote: > > > On Mar 22, 7:47 pm, Jeff Kell wrote: >> Now getting "We re sorry, the Netflix website and the ability to >> instantly watch movies are both temporarily unavailable." out of Charter. >> >> Campus getting same routed via 1239 209 2906. >>

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

On Mar 22, 7:47 pm, Jeff Kell wrote: > Now getting "We re sorry, the Netflix website and the ability to > instantly watch movies are both temporarily unavailable." out of Charter. > > Campus getting same routed via 1239 209 2906. > > Jeff Guess that move to Amazon EC2 wasn't such a good idea. F

Re: SBL99576 195.191.102.0/24 SR04

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:17:30 -0700 (PDT) goe...@anime.net wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: > > as a european provider, we have no liability whatsoever for what customers > > do or do not do > > about the best reason i can think of for listing this block until the heat > de

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

Now getting "We’re sorry, the Netflix website and the ability to instantly watch movies are both temporarily unavailable." out of Charter. Campus getting same routed via 1239 209 2906. Jeff

RE: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

What Paul missed was to credit this info. http://www.netflix.com/ Rather simple to go look. Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu Senior Network Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone CNS - Network Services352-392-2061 CNS Phone Tree University of Florida 352-273-0743 FAX Florida Lambda Rail

RE: Question/Netflix issues?

Greetings, I know this is way off topic, but is anyone else getting calls/tickets about Netflix access problems? -Joe Blanchard Quite to the contrary Joe. It is actually a pleasure to read an operationally relevant thread on NANOG. If your customers are calling about accessibility

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

Where do you pick up their feeds from ? A lot of their content seems to come from CDNs like Akamai in my neighbourhood (in this case, Torix). That being said, I just tried to watch a movie and all I get is "Checking for device activation" My browser seems to be blabbing back and forth with 20

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

Netflix is currently down Sent from my iPhone On 2011-03-22, at 6:47 PM, "Raul Rodriguez" wrote: > What does the AS path look like from them to you? > > -RR > > On 3/22/11, Joe Blanchard wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I know this is way off topic, but is anyone else getting calls/ >> tickets >>

Re: SBL99576 195.191.102.0/24 SR04

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: as a european provider, we have no liability whatsoever for what customers do or do not do about the best reason i can think of for listing this block until the heat death of the universe. -Dan

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

http://twitter.com/Netflixhelps/status/50326616840220672 On Mar 22, 2011 4:15 PM, "Joe Blanchard" wrote: > Greetings, > > I know this is way off topic, but is anyone else getting calls/tickets > about Netflix access problems? > > I tried (sucessfully) to duplicate the issues, seems like extremely

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

Thanks Paul, I keep getting busy signals trying to reach them after the Sales office and directly. Just needed to know it wasn't something on our side. Thanks all for the feed back. -Joe Blanchard On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Paul M. Impellizzeri wrote: > > > >We¹re sorry, the Netf

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

We¹re sorry, the Netflix website and the ability to instantly watch movies are both temporarily unavailable.However, our shipping centers are continuing to send and receive DVDs so your order is in process as usual. Our engineers are working hard to bring the site an

Re: OT: Question/Netflix issues?

What does the AS path look like from them to you? -RR On 3/22/11, Joe Blanchard wrote: > Greetings, > > I know this is way off topic, but is anyone else getting calls/tickets > about Netflix access problems? > > I tried (sucessfully) to duplicate the issues, seems like extremely slow > respons

Re: SORBS contact?

For future reference: you're much more likely to elicit a useful response by using the "mailop" list, since you'll be addressing a mixed audience of mail system operators, DNSBL operators, software authors, etc., all of whom are focused on mail and not network operations. ---rsk

Re: SORBS contact?

On Mar 22, 2011, at 7:08 PM, Mike wrote: > On 03/22/2011 03:58 PM, Paul Graydon wrote: >> On 03/22/2011 12:24 PM, Franck Martin wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> They know the challenges, aware of the issues and I have seen some >>> progress. >> >> I'm glad to hear that, one less extortion racket on the 'n

OT: Question/Netflix issues?

Greetings, I know this is way off topic, but is anyone else getting calls/tickets about Netflix access problems? I tried (sucessfully) to duplicate the issues, seems like extremely slow responses from the servers I have tested, as well seems the web servers are also either overloaded or just dr

Re: SORBS contact?

On 03/22/2011 03:58 PM, Paul Graydon wrote: On 03/22/2011 12:24 PM, Franck Martin wrote: +1 They know the challenges, aware of the issues and I have seen some progress. I'm glad to hear that, one less extortion racket on the 'net is no bad thing. They might do better by rebranding though. SOR

Re: SBL99576 195.191.102.0/24 SR04

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:05:11 -, Sven Olaf Kamphuis said: > > IDEAR4BUSINESS (trademark fraud replicas spammers) > > Trademark fraud replicas & knock-offs advertised in spam. (was SBL99180, > > also SBL99576) > > - trademarks are not valid in china > - chinese law applies to the customer's ser

Re: SORBS contact?

On 03/22/2011 12:24 PM, Franck Martin wrote: +1 They know the challenges, aware of the issues and I have seen some progress. I'm glad to hear that, one less extortion racket on the 'net is no bad thing. They might do better by rebranding though. SORBS has one heck of an amount of negative

Re: SORBS contact?

+1 They know the challenges, aware of the issues and I have seen some progress. - Original Message - From: "Steve Atkins" To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, 23 March, 2011 9:56:20 AM Subject: Re: SORBS contact? On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Mike wrote: > On 03/22/2011 12:14 PM, Paul

SBL99576 195.191.102.0/24 SR04

BL99576 195.191.102.0/24 SR04 SBL100272 195.191.102.0/23 SR02 > IDEAR4BUSINESS (trademark fraud replicas spammers) > Trademark fraud replicas & knock-offs advertised in spam. (was SBL99180, > also SBL99576) - trademarks are not valid in china - chinese law applies to the customer's services - no

Re: SORBS contact?

On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Mike wrote: > On 03/22/2011 12:14 PM, Paul Graydon wrote: >> On 03/22/2011 09:07 AM, Chris Conn wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Thank you to all that answered, all helpful info. Surprisingly minutes >>> after my Nanog post, a couple of my tickets saw action and the /24 wa

Re: SORBS contact?

On 03/22/2011 12:14 PM, Paul Graydon wrote: On 03/22/2011 09:07 AM, Chris Conn wrote: Hello, Thank you to all that answered, all helpful info. Surprisingly minutes after my Nanog post, a couple of my tickets saw action and the /24 was finally removed a short while later. Thanks again, Chris

Re: SORBS contact?

On 03/22/2011 09:07 AM, Chris Conn wrote: Hello, Thank you to all that answered, all helpful info. Surprisingly minutes after my Nanog post, a couple of my tickets saw action and the /24 was finally removed a short while later. Thanks again, Chris Woah... *collapses on the floor in shock*

Re: SORBS contact?

Hello, Thank you to all that answered, all helpful info. Surprisingly minutes after my Nanog post, a couple of my tickets saw action and the /24 was finally removed a short while later. Thanks again, Chris

ATT Maro

Does anyone have information regarding the AT&T MARO product for redundancy? What technology are they using? Is it simply being done via BGP? Any information would be greatly appreciated Don DuQuette

Re: CSI New York fake IPv6

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Skeeve Stevens wrote: I just thought this is amusing that in CSI: New York – Season 7, Episode 17, they do a 'Remote Desktop' hack and they enter in the following details… http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg Promoting IPv6 = Win! Dodgy Address = Fail

Re: DWDM Metro Access Design

What's the constraint that rules out using SONET or something similar, which is designed to give you a robust ring topology? I think it's probably quite important to know whether that's really, absolutely out of the question, or whether it's a possibility to relax that in favour of a less painfu